Excerpt: from Betsy Bonaparte, by Helen Jean Burn

Posted by csollod on Tuesday, December 13th, 2011

Helen Jean Burn writes in Betsy Bonaparte (Maryland Historical Society, 2010) about the new city of Baltimore, where William Patterson, father of the “belle of Baltimore,” settled in the late eighteenth century:

Geography had determined the placement of this town far up the Chesapeake Bay, deep into a fertile countryside where crops could be grown and then shipped out. On the west side of the upper bay, the Patapsco River splits into three branches. The northwest branch ends in a small basin. At its 1729 founding, Baltimore Town bordered this basin. On the south side of the basin, later called the inner harbor, was Smith’s Hill, so named because it had been described by the original white explorer of Maryland, John Smith. Along the west edge of the basin ran a trail that became the coastal road between north and south.

….

Continuing north, the trail bent around the Baltimore basin, then rose northeast over low hills, to cross the stream that marked the town’s eastern boundary…. This boundary stream, named Jones Falls, was deep enough to accommodate ships, although they could not turn around until a turning basin had been made.

….

In the early years, the streets were named after the Maryland colony’s proprietor, Charles Calvert, Lord Baltimore. Charles and Calvert Streets ran north and south; Baltimore Street stretched from the Great Road on the west to Jones Falls on the east. There a market was built, called Marsh Market because of the swampy ground along the stream, and town folk commonly omitted the name of Baltimore Street and instead referred to it as Market Street. Beyond Jones Falls, the land continued eastward along the Patapsco River to a nearby settlement called Fell’s Point. There the water was much deeper than that of the Baltimore basin, and in time Fell’s Point became a site for shipbuilding and a mooring place for ocean-going ships. Yet it was to Baltimore Town’s encircled basin that men with the most money came. Their investments would enable Baltimore to expand, absorb Fell’s Point, and for a time surpass both Philadelphia and Boston.

Who will play Betsy Bonaparte?

Posted by csollod on Monday, December 12th, 2011

The Maryland Historical Society has published two books about one of Baltimore’s most famous citizens, Betsy Bonaparte, a wealthy young lady born Elizabeth Patterson of the Patterson merchant family who would later give its name to Patterson Park: Betsy Bonaparte, by Helen Jean Burn (2010), and Betsy Bonaparte, The Belle of Baltimore, by Claude Bourguignon-Frasseto (1988, 2003, originally published in French). Her story is ripe for new movie development. Two have been made: Glorious Betsy, which came out in 1928, starring Dolores Costello Barrymore; and Hearts Divided, 1936.

At age 18, in 1803, against both families’ wishes, Betsy Patterson married Jerome Bonaparte, who was in the United States evading capture by the British. Napoleon was dead set against this match for his youngest brother, and the Emperor tended to win his battles. Despite Betsy’s pregnancy, he forced the marriage to be annulled, and our heroine spent the next 25 years living off and on in the great capitals of Europe, advocating for her son’s rights as a royal and enjoying herself. She was spunky, determined, and passionate, and she wore revealing clothes at the very height and edge of fashion. Though she was an heiress and ended her life a wealthy woman in Baltimore, she had significant financial worries throughout, as her father indicated his continued disapproval of her actions by bequeathing her far less than her brothers received in his will.

Burn’s book is particularly entertaining and accessible. Her presentation of Betsy Bonaparte’s life as a “fitful fever,” with ups and downs and the emotional trials the young woman must have endured as her husband rejected her and their son in favor of his family are far more interesting than presentation of a life of balls, suitors, and witty bon mots repeated for generations. The “belle of Baltimore” was a complicated and interesting woman, along with being beautiful, and that’s a far more compelling route for a book–or new movie–to take.

A Garden Grows in Baltimore

Posted by csollod on Tuesday, November 29th, 2011

Baltimore residents Clarence and Rudine Ridgely flaunted neighborhood custom and covered their gorgeous, lush front lawn in favor of a gorgeous, lush vegetable garden, as chronicled in Edible Estates: Attack on the Front Lawn, 2nd Edition, by Fritz Haeg (Bellerophon Publications/Metropolis Books, 2010). It’s a beautiful book about a wonderful series of projects around the country: turning lawns or unused space (sometimes considered unusable due to size or location) into food-producing gardens, and in the process changing people’s perceptions of what a front garden should be. I started my own vegetable garden this year. Having never had outdoor space of any sort before, I didn’t even realize that my small–12′ x 19′–townhouse front yard was supposed to be a lawn. I grew up in the fog belt of San Francisco. One year my father planted tomatoes. We had so little garden knowledge that we didn’t even realize they really did need sun to grow. I think I thought sun was optional, that it would make the plants better, if you wanted something really good, but that you’d get something even without sun. I realized my mistake this past spring when I tried to grow peas in our shady back yard in Baltimore. They sprouted, produced a few pods, and died from lack of sunlight as the overhanging tree’s leaves filled out. So I moved the whole project–tomato sprouts, basil, strawberries, and cucumber sprouts–to the front, where they thrived. No one complained because it looks better than the weeds that were there. Clarence Ridgely is remarkably tolerant about neighbors taking his produce, something I thought I wouldn’t be. I wanted to build a fence, but couldn’t afford the wrought iron required in my neighborhood. By mid-September, with five happily producing cherry tomato plants, I was begging people to come over to harvest some.

Edible Estates also includes several essays about the importance of vegetable gardening by Michael Pollan, author of Omnivore’s Dilemma and Food Rules; Will Allen, who started the Milwaukee Urban Farm; Lesley Stern; and Rosalind Creasy, who grows heirloom vegetables. Fritz Haeg also writes about another important area garden: the White House vegetable garden, which he loves for its accessibility and inexpensive choices of what to grow. Any American family can grow an edible estate; the ones included in Edible Estates are inspiring local examples. Even in the fog belt of San Francisco, the lemon trees thrived.

Baltimore represent!

Posted by csollod on Wednesday, November 16th, 2011

Great picture of Edward, 73, from Baltimore at Slate as one of the Occupy Wall Street protesters.

Question #2 about Noah’s Compass by Anne Tyler

Posted by csollod on Sunday, November 13th, 2011


Noah’s Compass

I’ll be leading the Baltimore Book Club in discussing Noah’s Compass by Anne Tyler this Monday, November 14, 7:30pm at the Barnes & Noble Johns Hopkins, 33rd and St. Paul. In my last post, I asked if you would date Liam Pennywell. Next lead-up question: Would you date Eunice? Would you have kept the relationship going after the big reveal?

Baltimore Book Club to Discuss Noah’s Compass by Anne Tyler

Posted by csollod on Wednesday, November 9th, 2011


Noah’s Compass

I’ll be hosting The Baltimore Book Club at Barnes & Noble Johns Hopkins, 3330 St. Paul, Monday, November 14, 7:30pm, when we’ll discuss Noah’s Compass by Anne Tyler. First question: would you date Liam Pennywell? Would you date him if you could ignore his external characteristics and focus on the internal?

Born Free: The Most Dangerous Thing, by Laura Lippman, and Drinking Closer to Home, by Jessica Anya Blau

Posted by csollod on Tuesday, November 1st, 2011

Children of the 70s (I’m one) have been called one of “the least parented, least nurtured generations in U.S. history.” Parents were focused on finding themselves, self-actualization, and other pursuits in which children were not included. Meanwhile, kids had a lot more freedom than they do today, a loss I often lament. But the excessive freedom has been a mixed blessing for the children in Laura Lippman and Jessica Anya Blau‘s latest novels: The Most Dangerous Thing (William Morrow, 2011) and Drinking Closer to Home (HarperPerennial, 2011). Bad things can happen to children alone in the woods, literally or figuratively. Sometimes they get over it. Sometimes they don’t.

In Jessica Anya Blau’s Drinking Closer to Home, the mother of the family quits her household duties to paint: “The year Anna was eleven, Portia was eight, and Emery was three, Louise decided she quit being a housewife.” Anna takes over the kitchen; Portia takes care of their younger brother; and the house itself dissolves in the kind of slovenly mess that means the sheets have to be thrown out once a year when they all clean before their grandparents come for a visit.

In The Most Dangerous Thing, five neighborhood kids hang out together one summer, walking farther and farther into the woods near their houses in Dickeyville. “The primary rule, in those day before cell phones, was that we had to stay within shouting distance of Gwen’s house. But what was shouting distance?” They test the distance by walking a ways away from the loudest and youngest member of their group, the troubled and troublesome Go-go (Gordon). He shouts, and when they hear him, they consider that shouting distance. Their fathers are at work, looking for work, or not in the picture, and their mothers are absorbed by painting, overwhelmed with housework, or at work themselves.

Both books toggle back and forth between the 1970s and today. In contemporary life, Louise, the wife and mother in Drinking Closer to Home, has had a heart attack, and her husband and adult children have gathered around her to keep a vigil. Together they struggle through their various issues: Portia’s husband leaving her, Anna’s addictive appetites, and most of all, Emery and his boyfriend Alejandro’s desire to have a baby using Portia or Anna’s eggs. Their unconventional upbringing and wacky family background, including their near-abusive paternal grandparents, make an entertaining and slightly horrifying story to today’s overinvolved parents (I’m one of those, too), but most of Anna, Portia, and Emery’s problems stem from their own personalities and situations. Their colorful early life doesn’t appear to have been any more damaging than a more traditional childhood in the long run. They wished their parents were more present when they were young, and then they got over the neglect as adults: “It has been only recently that Anna forgave her mother for a litany of crimes Anna had been carrying in her stomach like a knotted squid.” There were compensations, such as Portia and Emery’s closeness and Anna’s freedom, and they made the most of those.

In The Most Dangerous Thing, Go-go, a lifetime alcoholic and ne’er-do-well, has died in a car crash, and Gwen’s father has fallen and broken his hip, so Gwen is back in Dickeyville to care for him, bringing all five children, now adults, together for the funeral.

Gwen, Sean, and Tim want to work out what happened to Go-go. Was it a crash or a suicide? Hadn’t he been sober for two years? What happened in the woods, all those years ago, when their explorations brought them into contact with a crazy homeless person who lived in a shack there? What happened the night of the 1980 hurricane, when Chicken George, as they called the stranger, chased Go-go and Mickey? Doris Halloran, the boys’ long-suffering mother, has kept Go-go’s secrets for many years, and isn’t about to let them out now, but even she would like to know why Go-go started wetting the bed again at age 10.

There’s a lot hanging on one summer of friendship in The Most Dangerous Thing. It’s hard to believe that one summer of camaraderie, then dissolution of the group when two of its members pair off, plus sexual molestation and and an uncertain death, would wreak so much havoc in their adult lives. In Lippman’s I’d Know You Anywhere, the protagonist is kidnapped for months and suffers far worse as a teenager, but Eliza’s adult life is happy and sunny, with a strong marriage and satisfactory child-rearing of the next generation, in addition to a few lingering fears that do not dominate her world. The difference might be in how the parents handled the negative incident. Eliza’s parents moved away from the scene of the crime and encouraged their daughter to discuss her kidnapping as much or as little as she wished. In The Most Dangerous Thing, the Hallorans, Robisons, and Mickey’s family sweep it under the rug. The fathers promise never to talk about how Chicken George died, even to their wives. So when the remaining four members of the five points of the star, as they thought of themselves that summer, are together again more than thirty years later, there’s still a lot to figure out.

Lippman proclaimed at her talk at the Baltimore Book Festival that she had a “glorious” childhood, exculpating her parents, who were apparently worried she writes as she does due to incidents they were unaware of. Blau, on the other hand, has said that her tales of borderline neglectful parents and home fun for kids draw largely from her own childhood. Who knows whether or not largely unsupervised childhoods are damaging in the long run? The Most Dangerous Thing and Drinking Closer to Home provide limited but entertaining evidence that it can go either way.

Stephen Dixon Backlist to Reprint

Posted by csollod on Tuesday, November 1st, 2011

Kyle Minor reports at the literature blog HTML Giant that much of former Johns Hopkins Writing Seminars faculty member Stephen Dixon’s backlist will be reprinted by Dzanc Books rEprint catalog.

Oprah Loves Us

Posted by csollod on Sunday, October 30th, 2011

Baltimore writer Michael Kimball’s Us, which I reviewed here, was named to Oprah’s summer reading list in O Magazine back in June. I asked the author if being on Oprah’s radar changed his life in any significant way, wondering if an author Oprah loves would even still remember me, and he did! Michael said his life is still pretty much the same: it was “a really nice surprise and it definitely increased sales…. but it did not change my life in any significant way. I’m not sure things like that do. They are mostly just nice blips and I just keep writing the kind of books I want to write.” Yes, but Oprah loves you, Michael. That’s got to feel good.

Area Poets Named Radcliffe Institute Fellows

Posted by csollod on Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

Area poets Reginald Dwayne Betts (he’s from Bowie; I try to stay away from DC literary life, but I figure it’s outside the DC Beltway, and I’m a lot more willing to claim a poet for Baltimore than a politician) and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (Hopkins MA in Creative Writing, and still lives in the area part-time) have been awarded Radcliffe Institute Fellowships, according to Poets & Writers magazine (scroll down to “Harvard”). They will spend a year working on new projects and interacting with their peer fellows from many other disciplines at Radcliffe. The Radcliffe Institute Fellowships bring together accomplished writers, artists, musicians, and professionals from other disciplines to work on new projects in a setting where they can simultaneously focus on their own work and be influenced and spurred to greater productivity through interactions with others.

Betts recently had this poem published in Poetry magazine.