Archive for March, 2010

Star Light, Star Really, Really Bright

Posted by amanda on Friday, March 26th, 2010

hubblep3-300x300

NASA Hubble Space Telescope Collection

The universe is expanding, and from far, far away in space and time, astronomers can see the formation of massive galaxies. These bright clusters of stars more than a few million light years away appear redder (or redshifted) than closer stars which helps in determining their distance and thus, time, in the development of the universe. Astronomers study these distant massive galaxies to better understand the timescale of galaxy formation and how galaxy shapes are formed, such as disks and bulges.

Observation of some of these massive galaxies in the early Universe (known as sub-millimeter galaxies due to their wavelength, or high redshift) has revealed a very high rate of star formation, higher than expected from models. One hypothesis for this fast rate is the possibility of the merging of two gas-rich galaxies. Direct examination of the star-forming regions of these very distant galaxies has been difficult due to the limitations of modern-day telescopes.

In a paper published this week online in Nature, a group of scientists, including two from the Department of Astronomy at the University of Maryland, use a unique solution to study one of these massive galaxies from the young Universe. By studying a sub-millimeter galaxy (known as SMMJ2135-0102), they took advantage of strong gravitational lensing that magnifies the galaxy from the bending of light by massive galaxy clusters that lie behind them. With this magnification, they then used high-resolution sub-millimeter imaging to resolve the star-forming regions at a linear scale of only 100 parsecs (one parsec is about 3.26 light years or 31 trillion kilometers), only slightly higher than the resolution of viewing giant molecular clouds in our own Milky Way.

By comparing brightness and size between the high redshift galaxy and local galaxies and molecular clouds in the present-day Universe, the researchers found that the star forming region was not only 100 times larger, but also 100,000,000 times brighter. And although the star-forming energetics are much higher than local galaxies, the underlying physics of the processes are the same. Because the physics are similar, this means that techniques used for star-forming processes in the Milky Way can be used for sub-millimeter galaxies.

So physics has not changed between the early Universe and the present-day Universe — young Universe galaxies are just really, really big, bright, and productive.

Ruth L. Kirschstein

Posted by amanda on Monday, March 22nd, 2010

Ruth Kirschstein

Most graduate students and postdocs in the biomedical sciences associate the name “Ruth L. Kirchstein” with a group of highly sought after awards offered by the NIH, the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards (NRSA), responsible for 119 individual fellowships and 115 institutional training grants in Maryland out of over 15,000 nationwide.

Congress named the NRSA after Dr. Ruth Kirschstein in 2002. A resident of Bethesda for over 45 years, Dr. Kirschstein was the first woman director of an NIH institute, National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Before that, she made major contributions in the safe development of the polio vaccine. Among many of her accomplishments in her long career with the NIH, she organized funding for and mobilized a team of NIH scientists to research the emerging AIDS epidemic and to search for treatments.

Kirschstein was an advocate of predoctoral research training and for promoting diversity in the scientific community. Entering medical school in 1947, she faced discrimination for being a woman in a primarily male field and even reported receiving a rejection letter from one medical school stating, “We only take men.” While at the NIH, she made it a priority to recruit women scientists in an equal proportion to men, recommending them for peer review panels, and supporting their membership in the Institute of Medicine.

Dr. Kirschstein died in October of 2009, but her name will still usher some promising young scientists onto the path of a research career.

Heat-sensing Vipers

Posted by amanda on Thursday, March 18th, 2010

pit viper

Timber rattlesnake; Taken by Tad Arensmeier from St. Louis, MO, USA

Hikers in Maryland are repeatedly warned at trailheads about the presence of venomous snakes. According to the Maryland DNR, there are over 27 species and subspecies of snakes in Maryland, including two venomous pit vipers, the copperhead and timber rattlesnake. Pit vipers are named for their large specialized pit organs located between the nostril and eye on each side of their face. These organs allow pit vipers to sense infrared radiation, detecting warm-blooded prey at temperatures above ~30°C and distances of up to one meter.

The pit organ is composed of a thin membrane suspended in a hollow chamber. This membrane, serving as an infrared antenna, is packed with mitochondria (cellular power plants) and linked to many nerve fibers. These fibers send signals from the pit organs to the brain. The sensitivity of detection is dependent on the anatomical and molecular characteristics of the pit organ.

This week in a Nature advance online publication, scientists reveal the identity of the molecular sensor used by pit vipers and describe how these sensors convey information to the snake brain. Rather than “seeing” in infrared, the pit organ actually heats up due to the ion channel TRPA1. Researchers found TRPA1 in nerve endings leading to the pit organ at levels 400x that in other nerve endings. Humans and other mammals also have TRPA1 (63% similar to pit viper) which is activated by the pungent agent from wasabi and mustard plants. Unlike our TRPA1, the pit viper receptor is not only activated by the mustard agent but also by heat above 28°C. The heat activation of these channels provides an infrared map to the snake brain.

Interestingly, the researchers found no activation of TRPA1 channels in cooler temperatures, although it is known that snakes can respond to temperatures well below 28°C, perhaps to locate cooler areas in which to rest. Is there another receptor that can detect cooler climes? Or maybe the anatomy of the pit organ tunes TRPA1 in a way we haven’t yet explored.

According to the Maryland DNR, only 2-5 people get bitten by a venomous snake in the state each year. If you happen to be one of the unlucky ones, just remember:
- Don’t apply ice.
- Do keep the bite immobilized and below your heart.
- Don’t apply a tourniquet.
- Do wash it with soap and water.
- Don’t make an incision.
- Do get help immediately.

Carol Greider

Posted by amanda on Sunday, March 14th, 2010

Carol Greider

Recipient of the 2009 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine, Carol Greider is the first woman at a Maryland institution to win the award. Along with the work of co-winners Elizabeth Blackburn (her graduate advisor at U.C. Berkeley) and Jack Szostak, Greider’s research at Johns Hopkins has contributed immensely to the understanding of telomeres and their shortening.

Telomeres are sequences of repetitive DNA at the ends of chromosomes that protect the chromosome from unintentional annealing and degradation. In each replication of a chromosome, telomeres shorten due to the way they are added on to chromosome ends by the enzyme telomerase, which was discovered by Greider and Blackburn in 1985. Intriguingly, most of what we know about telomeres comes from the study of a protozoan with 40,000 chromosomes per cell (compared to our 46), Tetrahymena. More on Greider’s research can be read at her lab’s website.

In a talk she gave last week at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Greider made a list of what you need to become a successful scientist:

  • Show up.
  • Pay close attention.
  • Work on something you love.
  • Read, read, read…
  • Read critically.
  • Don’t believe everything you read.
  • Make bold hypotheses.
  • Don’t believe the status quo.
  • Critically test your hypotheses.
  • Disprove your own models.
  • Be nice to people.
  • Stand up for yourself.
  • Ignore (perceived) obstacles.
  • Rely on friends and family.
  • Talk to people about your ideas.
  • Have fun (most of the time).
  • Although her talk was mainly on her research with telomeres, this list is the part that I really took to heart. It can now be found above my lab bench.

    The Internal Compass

    Posted by amanda on Thursday, March 11th, 2010

    Billions of white blood cells are streaming through your bloodstream. They’re on patrol, defending you from foreign invaders and protecting you from infection. Some respond to parasites, others to viruses and allergens. When certain white bloods cells called neutrophils detect an infection or area of injury, they will move in, engulfing and digesting any foreign bacteria or fungi in their path. But how does a neutrophil know where to go? How does it sense its target? What is its internal compass?

    Neutrophils, and many other cells, use chemotaxis, the detection and directed movement of cells in response to a chemical gradient. In an advance publication of the Annual Review of Biophysics, Kristen Swaney and members of the Devreotes Lab in the Department of Cell Biology at Johns Hopkins University review the process of chemotaxis in eukaryotic cells (like our neutrophils). Much of what we know about chemotaxis in these cells is from the study of Dictyostelium, a soil-living amoeba commonly (and lovingly?) known as slime mold.

    YouTube Preview Image

    Neutrophil chasing a bacterium

    The process of chemotaxis does not actually begin with signal detection but with random cell movement. Cells like neutrophils and Dictyostelium extend pseudopodia (literally “fake feet”) made up of filaments consisting of many molecules of actin protein. The actin in these filaments interacts with myosin protein at the cell’s end, causing contraction (just like in your muscle cells), propelling the cell forward. After extension, the cell reassembles the actin filaments, so it can begin again. With this ambling gait, the cell moves in a random direction. In the absence of an attractant, cells extend pseudopodia from each side uniformly. But once the cell senses an attractant, pseudopodia extend toward the signal. Most notable is the wave-like motion through the cell when an attractant is present. This wave is caused from the recruitment of actin-binding proteins sequentially from the inside of the cell to points on the surface and may underlie the generation of pseudopodia.

    Cells detect chemical attractants with receptors on their surfaces. Once receptors bind an attractant molecule, a signal cascade is initiated and a network of signaling pathways is activated leading to the formation of actin into filaments and movement. Eukaryotic cells are capable of sensing both the amount of attractant and the location of the attractant in space, detecting how many receptors have bound attractant and where those receptors are located on their surface. Interestingly, if an attractant is present in low amounts, the cell will “adapt” to the presence of attractant and actually be more sensitive to an attractant gradient by ignoring the background.

    Genetic analysis of Dictyostelium has revealed a complex and wide range of interacting players in the process of chemotaxis. In her review, Swaney emphasizes that we still have much to learn about the components involved in wave propagation, the mechanism of attractant adaptation, the localization of components, and the complexity of multiple signaling networks. There are many pieces to an internal compass.

    Florence Sabin

    Posted by amanda on Monday, March 8th, 2010

    Today is International Women’s Day, where women are celebrated globally for their economic, social, political, and scientific achievements. This post is in continuation of my own celebration of National Women’s History Month.
    ——————————–

    Florence Sabin

    Florence Rena Sabin’s life was full of firsts. In 1896, after saving up money for 3 years as a schoolteacher, Florence Rena Sabin enrolled in Johns Hopkins Medical School. From a mining town in Colorado, Sabin was the first woman to graduate with an M.D. from Johns Hopkins. After graduation, she joined the Department of Anatomy with the support of a fellowship from the Baltimore Association for the Promotion of University Education of Women. She was the first woman faculty member at Johns Hopkins, the first woman to hold the rank of full professor, the first woman president of the American Association of Anatomists, the first woman elected to membership in the National Academy of Sciences, and the first woman to be appointed a full member at the Rockefeller Institute. In her obituary in the British Medical Journal, she was referred to as “the greatest living woman scientist and one of the foremost scientists of all time”.

    Her research contributed more than a hundred papers to the literature on the lymphatic system, tuberculosis, blood vessels, cells, and connective tissue. Contrary to popular belief at the time, Sabin demonstrated that the lymphatic system structure was formed from an embryo’s veins rather than from other tissues. Among her other research, she perfected a cell staining technique use to visualize live cells. As a scientist at the Rockefeller Institute, she made major contributions to the understanding of the human immune response to tuberculosis.

    Upon accepting the Pictorial Review achievement award in 1929, Sabin said:

    I hope my studies may be an encouragement to other women, especially to young women, to devote their lives to the larger interests of the mind. It matters little whether men or women have the more brains; all we women need to do to exert our proper influence is just to use all the brains we have.

    Rest assured, Dr. Sabin, you are an encouragement.

    See the National Library of Medicine for a more detailed biography of Sabin.

    Regression in the Dark

    Posted by amanda on Friday, March 5th, 2010

    Why don’t humans have tails or gills? Why aren’t we covered in hair? Why don’t we have all the traits of our primitive ancestors? When we think of the advance of evolution, we may think of increasing complexity, but many traits are lost due to regressive evolution. Regressive evolution is the disappearance of an ancestral trait or characteristic over time.

    Surface FishCavefish

    A. mexicanus Surface Fish and Cavefish; Courtesy of William Jeffery

    In order to better understand how regressive evolution occurs, scientists have found a model organism among cave-dwelling animals. Cavefish, like most cave-dwelling animals, have lost their eyes and pigmentation over time. And interestingly, they can interbreed with their surface-dwelling counterparts who still have eyes and normal pigment, making them a model tool for understanding the genetics of trait loss.

    How are traits lost in evolution? It may be that genes responsible for these traits are mutated or lost due to their lack of advantage. Or perhaps it is somehow more beneficial to not have the lost trait due to energy conservation. A third theory is that lost traits may be negatively linked to other traits that now benefit the organism in a new environment. When one gene affects many traits, this is known as pleiotropy.

    In a recent review in the journal Annual Review of Genetics, William Jeffery, a professor at the University of Maryland’s Department of Biology, discusses regressive evolution in the cavefish Astyanax mexicanus. Known as the Blind Tetra, A. mexicanus is native to 30 known caves in Mexico but can now be found in laboratories around the United States due to its short reproduction time, simple diet, and frequent spawning. Although cavefish appear eyeless, they actually have small nonfunctional eyes in a smaller eye socket completely covered with skin. In Jeffery’s lab, when a cavefish embryo is transplanted with a surface fish lens, the cavefish is able to develop an eye, containing a retina lacking pigment. The lens of the eye prevents cell death in the retina. Because the surface fish lens was able to rescue eye development, this suggests that the lens has a fundamental role in regulating eye degeneration and may be the crucial trait that is lost in the regressive evolution of eyesight.

    From genetic studies, it is estimated that up to twelve separate genes are responsible for eye loss. One of these genes (known as shh), affects both eye degeneration and the enhancement of oral and taste bud development, traits that would be advantageous to a cave-dwelling fish. This indicates that pleiotropy may play a role in eye regressive evolution. Jeffery stresses that more than one of the three possible theories for regressive evolution may be responsible for eye loss in cavefish. The search to identify all of the genes that affect eye degeneration in A. mexicanus is underway and may lead to insights about our own regressive evolution.

    I wish I could trade in my spleen for a tail…

    Henrietta Lacks

    Posted by amanda on Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

    March is National Women’s History Month. In celebration, I plan to make one post a week featuring women that contributed significantly to science in Baltimore.

    Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks

    I want to start with Henrietta Lacks, a woman from Turner Station whose cancerous cells were taken and turned into one of the most powerful scientific tools we have today. The tumorous cells that were removed from Henrietta’s cervix at Johns Hopkins Hospital during her treatment in 1951 were the first immortal human tissue cells to be cultured. First grown in the lab of George and Margaret Gey, Henrietta’s cells can be maintained indefinitely and have been used for countless experiments to study everything from cancer to the effects of atomic radiation on human tissue. Named HeLa, these cells led to advances in human genetics, such as the numbering of chromosomes, as well as to the cell culture, cloning, and in vitro fertilization methods we use today.

    The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot is an excellent read on the history of Henrietta and HeLa cells and highlights the moral and legal dilemmas of tissue collection. In her book, Skloot discusses how the Lacks family (who still reside in Baltimore) did not know about the use of HeLa cells until decades after their spread into laboratories around the world, and that while biotechnology companies that produce and sell HeLa continue to profit, the Lacks family has struggled with affording health insurance.

    According to Skloot, there has never been an official effort by Johns Hopkins to honor Henrietta Lacks and her biological contribution to science. With the amazing press Skloot’s book has generated, I have a feeling this may change soon.