Archive for the ‘Local Research’ Category

Clearing the Water

Posted by amanda on Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

K. veneficum

Karlodinium veneficum aka Gymnodinium galatheanum aka Karlodinium micrum; Courtesy of Prof. Allen Place

There’s a predator in Maryland waters. In 1996, 1997, and 1999, thousands of fish were killed at the HyRock Fish Farm on the Eastern Shore of the Chesapeake Bay. Water samples revealed the presence of two potential culprits, and after an initial case of mistaken identity, Karlodinium veneficum (then called Gymnodinium galatheanum) was found to be the cause. K. veneficum, a free-swimming phytoplankton or dinoflagellate, was first identified in Walvis Bay, Namibia in 1950 during the second Danish “Galathea” Deep Sea expedition. In South Africa, it caused periodic massive fish deaths, leaving the beaches covered with rotting fish and turning the water red with its thick algal blooms (colloquially known as red tide). In 2008, five fish kills in Chesapeake Bay and the Potomac occurred due to the presence of K. veneficum. This algae species is now considered a long term resident of Chesapeake Bay, and blooms (sometimes resulting in a “mahogany tide”) are monitored by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources.

Map of Algal Cell Counts on 6/29/09

Map of algal cell counts in the Bay on 6/29/09, K. veneficum marked by green triangles; Maryland DNR

Like many dinoflagellates, K. veneficum produces toxins, known as karlotoxins. Karlotoxins causes cells to rupture by increasing the ionic permeability of biological membranes (making them leaky until they explode). Fish are killed by damage to the gill epithelia. K. veneficum can gain energy both by photosynthesis and by the consumption of single-celled organisms. The production of toxins was hypothesized to be a self-defense system against other organisms in the phytoplankton grazing territory with local fish as the unlucky bystanders. Karlotoxins were identified and characterized in the lab of Allen Place of the Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology at the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science.

In the February 2nd issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Place and colleagues from the University of Minnesota, The Johns Hopkins University and the University of Hawaii show that karlotoxins are not just used by K. veneficum in self-defense. The toxic predatory strains use karlotoxins as a means of stunning their cryptophyte prey (Storeatula major) before ingesting it. Thus, the presence of prey leads to the presence of toxin. Therefore, by reducing the amount of K. veneficum prey in the Chesapeake and other infected waterways, K. veneficum may produce less toxin, leaving the fish to swim in peace.

Prey reduction (in conjunction with the input of native feeders) may help in developing effective management strategies against other predatory dinoflagellates in Maryland waters. According to the Maryland Department of the Environment, another dinoflagellate, Gyrodinium uncatenum, caused the largest fish kills in the state in 2008, resulting in 142,365 fish deaths. Unlike K. veneficum, G. uncatenum is non-toxic, and fish kills are thought to be caused by low dissolved oxygen produced from the large algal blooms. Like K. veneficum, G. uncatenum could gain energy from photosynthesis alone, but a reduction in prey may reduce the size of algal blooms and fish deaths.

How dinoflagellate prey reduction will be implemented without damaging the Bay ecology or industry is another scientific challenge that I hope I will have the pleasure of blogging about someday.

Studying the Sun

Posted by amanda on Saturday, February 13th, 2010

UV image of the sun

Ultraviolet image of the Sun; Credit: NASA

While many of us were huddled at home during last week’s snowstorm, some employees at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt were preparing for a mission of cosmic proportions. On February 11th, the Atlas V launched from Cape Canaveral to send the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) into space on its mission to better understand the sun. Although no shuttles or satellites are actually launched in Maryland, Goddard provides critical mission support for shuttle launches and missions like SDO from its Mission Operation Center and Network Integration Center. In the lead up to a mission, the center is staffed 24 hours a day as they prepare for a launch.

Layers of the Sun

Layers of the Sun; Credit: NASA

Although it is the center of our solar system and our closest star, there is still much to learn about the Sun. We know the Sun is a ball of gas composed of the same elements found on Earth (mainly hydrogen and helium) that get denser as they move inward to the Sun’s core. We also know it is composed of distinct layers, but we can only observe the Sun’s outer layers directly. These include the deepest layer we can see, the photosphere, the next outer layer, the chromosphere, and the outermost region of the atmosphere, the corona, which can be viewed as a halo during an eclipse. Although temperature generally decreases as you move out from the core of the Sun, the chromosphere can reach temperatures higher than the photosphere, and the corona can reach millions of Kelvin. The corona is so hot that the majority of radiation is emitted at ultraviolet and X-ray wavelengths. (The atmosphere of the Earth can block most of this light, which is why we aren’t constantly sunburned.) We don’t yet understand why the corona is so hot. It may be because of the Sun’s magnetic field, but the mechanism is still unknown.

Most important to space weather (and therefore, Earth weather) is the Sun’s solar activity, which is measured by the amount of sunspots present on the Sun. Sunspots are cooler regions on the Sun’s photosphere and so appear to be darker than the photosphere. Although sunspots are locally cooler, their presence is associated with greater overall solar temperatures. They form in cycles of an average of 11.1 years, where at the maximum over 100 sunspots can be seen, and sometimes no spots are observed at the minima. The cycle of sunspots is closely related to the magnetism of the Sun and form in regions of intense magnetic activity. Solar flares and coronal mass ejections, large explosions in the Sun’s atmosphere, often occur in these magnetically intense areas. During extended periods of low solar activity, the Earth can experience cold temperatures (such as during the Little Ice Age in the 17th century).

The NASA Goddard-managed SDO will aid in understanding the Sun’s magnetic changes. The spacecraft is built to fly for five years but will probably outlast itself like previous satellites. SDO is the first satellite to launch under the Living With a Star program at NASA aimed to understand the relationship of the Sun to space weather. By measuring the properties of the Sun and solar activity, SDO plans to determine how the magnetic field is generated and structured and how the stored magnetic energy is released outward from the Sun into space. SDO data and analysis will be used to help predict the solar variations that influence life on Earth. Among other things, SDO will examine sunspots, solar flares, and coronal mass ejections like the one observed less than a month ago from another Goddard-associated satellite:

YouTube Preview Image

STEREO satellite movie from NASA

We could certainly use more of the Sun around Baltimore right now.

For more detailed explanations of the Sun and its properties, see NASA or Wikipedia.

The Sound of Science

Posted by amanda on Thursday, February 11th, 2010

white-crowned sparrow in snow

White-crowned sparrow http://www.flickr.com/photos/lostinfog/ / CC BY-SA 2.0

In the middle of a snowstorm in Baltimore, there is a lack of sound. There are no moving cars, no birdsong in the trees, and the insulating snow dampens any cross-street conversation. Even the sirens seem more silent than usual. Luckily, we have the University of Maryland to remind us of the importance of urban sound. Published in the February issue of the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, David Luther from UM-College Park and Luis Baptista from the California Academy of Sciences report on their study on the effect of urban noise on white-crowned sparrows.

Human-made noise has long been suspected to have an impact on bird populations. Bird species are less abundant near highways and urbanization limits bird distribution. Noise has been shown to reduce nesting success and affect species interactions. Urban birds sing at a higher minimum frequency than rural birds to be heard above the low-pitched human-caused noise. (Think of the hum of the city.)

Birds, like humans, speak in vocal dialects that change with geographical region and often differ between neighboring populations. The alteration or change in learned songs between one generation and the next is described as the cultural evolution of songs. Some species of birds, such as the indigo bunting, are capable of changing dialects within less than a year, whereas others maintain their songs for decades or longer.

Luther and Baptista’s study is the first long-term study to document an increase in the minimum pitch of song over multiple generations of urban sparrows with a mixture of three dialects. By examining urban sparrow birdsong recordings spanning almost 30 years (1969, 1970, 1990, and 1998), they essentially observed the cultural evolution of sparrow song in a small San Francisco population. (Sparrows only live for 2 years, eliminating the possibility of recording the same individuals from the beginning to the end of the study.) Luther and Baptista found that the lowest frequency of birdsong rose over time with a shift to the dialect previously found within the most urban environment with the greatest ambient noise. This result of shifting dialect indicates an adaptation to the local acoustic environment over multiple generations. Songs (or dialects) change to a higher pitch to transmit more effectively in ambient noise.

So if urban noise affects bird dialects, does this mean that Baltimoreans will be speaking a higher pitch of Bawlmerese in 250 years? Maybe… if our breeding depended on it.