Posts Tagged ‘Baltimore’

The Internal Compass

Posted by amanda on Thursday, March 11th, 2010

Billions of white blood cells are streaming through your bloodstream. They’re on patrol, defending you from foreign invaders and protecting you from infection. Some respond to parasites, others to viruses and allergens. When certain white bloods cells called neutrophils detect an infection or area of injury, they will move in, engulfing and digesting any foreign bacteria or fungi in their path. But how does a neutrophil know where to go? How does it sense its target? What is its internal compass?

Neutrophils, and many other cells, use chemotaxis, the detection and directed movement of cells in response to a chemical gradient. In an advance publication of the Annual Review of Biophysics, Kristen Swaney and members of the Devreotes Lab in the Department of Cell Biology at Johns Hopkins University review the process of chemotaxis in eukaryotic cells (like our neutrophils). Much of what we know about chemotaxis in these cells is from the study of Dictyostelium, a soil-living amoeba commonly (and lovingly?) known as slime mold.

YouTube Preview Image

Neutrophil chasing a bacterium

The process of chemotaxis does not actually begin with signal detection but with random cell movement. Cells like neutrophils and Dictyostelium extend pseudopodia (literally “fake feet”) made up of filaments consisting of many molecules of actin protein. The actin in these filaments interacts with myosin protein at the cell’s end, causing contraction (just like in your muscle cells), propelling the cell forward. After extension, the cell reassembles the actin filaments, so it can begin again. With this ambling gait, the cell moves in a random direction. In the absence of an attractant, cells extend pseudopodia from each side uniformly. But once the cell senses an attractant, pseudopodia extend toward the signal. Most notable is the wave-like motion through the cell when an attractant is present. This wave is caused from the recruitment of actin-binding proteins sequentially from the inside of the cell to points on the surface and may underlie the generation of pseudopodia.

Cells detect chemical attractants with receptors on their surfaces. Once receptors bind an attractant molecule, a signal cascade is initiated and a network of signaling pathways is activated leading to the formation of actin into filaments and movement. Eukaryotic cells are capable of sensing both the amount of attractant and the location of the attractant in space, detecting how many receptors have bound attractant and where those receptors are located on their surface. Interestingly, if an attractant is present in low amounts, the cell will “adapt” to the presence of attractant and actually be more sensitive to an attractant gradient by ignoring the background.

Genetic analysis of Dictyostelium has revealed a complex and wide range of interacting players in the process of chemotaxis. In her review, Swaney emphasizes that we still have much to learn about the components involved in wave propagation, the mechanism of attractant adaptation, the localization of components, and the complexity of multiple signaling networks. There are many pieces to an internal compass.

The Sound of Science

Posted by amanda on Thursday, February 11th, 2010

white-crowned sparrow in snow

White-crowned sparrow http://www.flickr.com/photos/lostinfog/ / CC BY-SA 2.0

In the middle of a snowstorm in Baltimore, there is a lack of sound. There are no moving cars, no birdsong in the trees, and the insulating snow dampens any cross-street conversation. Even the sirens seem more silent than usual. Luckily, we have the University of Maryland to remind us of the importance of urban sound. Published in the February issue of the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, David Luther from UM-College Park and Luis Baptista from the California Academy of Sciences report on their study on the effect of urban noise on white-crowned sparrows.

Human-made noise has long been suspected to have an impact on bird populations. Bird species are less abundant near highways and urbanization limits bird distribution. Noise has been shown to reduce nesting success and affect species interactions. Urban birds sing at a higher minimum frequency than rural birds to be heard above the low-pitched human-caused noise. (Think of the hum of the city.)

Birds, like humans, speak in vocal dialects that change with geographical region and often differ between neighboring populations. The alteration or change in learned songs between one generation and the next is described as the cultural evolution of songs. Some species of birds, such as the indigo bunting, are capable of changing dialects within less than a year, whereas others maintain their songs for decades or longer.

Luther and Baptista’s study is the first long-term study to document an increase in the minimum pitch of song over multiple generations of urban sparrows with a mixture of three dialects. By examining urban sparrow birdsong recordings spanning almost 30 years (1969, 1970, 1990, and 1998), they essentially observed the cultural evolution of sparrow song in a small San Francisco population. (Sparrows only live for 2 years, eliminating the possibility of recording the same individuals from the beginning to the end of the study.) Luther and Baptista found that the lowest frequency of birdsong rose over time with a shift to the dialect previously found within the most urban environment with the greatest ambient noise. This result of shifting dialect indicates an adaptation to the local acoustic environment over multiple generations. Songs (or dialects) change to a higher pitch to transmit more effectively in ambient noise.

So if urban noise affects bird dialects, does this mean that Baltimoreans will be speaking a higher pitch of Bawlmerese in 250 years? Maybe… if our breeding depended on it.

Why is it cold?

Posted by amanda on Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

The storm this past weekend has been given many names: “Snowmageddon”, “Kahunageddon” , “Snowpocalypse. In Baltimore, December through January was the fifth snowiest period on record, and this January was the first in five years to have above normal snowfall. The first week of February has already dumped a total of 29.7 inches of snow with a deviation of -4.4 degrees from the average daily temperature.

So what is the science behind our winter weather?

One of the major contributing factors is the variation in atmospheric pressure in the Northern Hemisphere. We’re currently experiencing negative phases in both the Arctic Oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation indices, measurements of variations in atmospheric pressure. A “negative phase” in these atmospheric pressure patterns indicates relatively high pressure over the polar region and low pressure at midlatitudes, causing the frigid air in the stratosphere to move south into the continental United States. This means more snow for the Midwestern states and the East Coast while Greenland sees warmer winter temperatures.

The Arctic Oscillation index was largely positive in the early 1990s, resulting in relatively warmer winters in the continental United States, but the past year has shown a shift to the negative phase:

Data from NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction and averaged.

The reasons behind the shift in pressure patterns are unknown and may be random. It may be comforting to know that based on previous data, there’s bound to be a shift to the positive any year now. And these certainly aren’t the coldest winters Baltimore has ever had.  In both 1899 and 1934, February temperatures in Baltimore reached as low as -7oF.

May that be a comfort to you as you watch the snow fall tonight.