Archive for the ‘Religion’ Category

Just for Easter

Posted by Gary Vikan on Friday, April 2nd, 2010

Photo: GV

Photo: GV

Most of the great art of the European Middle Ages was devoted to religion. As was much of Europe’s finest art for centuries thereafter.

Toward the middle of the 15th century the great Sienese painter Giovanni di Paolo captured Christ in the Decent from the Cross with a spiritual intensity matched only by Christ’s Resurrection, as captured in a bronze three centuries later by the famous Roman artist of the Baroque period, Gian  Lorenzo Bernini.

Both works are small but immensely powerful.  And they are only a feet apart, in the master paintings galleries at the Walters.

Photo: GV

Photo: GV

If you had a choice – which of course you do not – which one would you prefer to own?

Do you think this is Jesus?

Posted by Gary Vikan on Monday, March 29th, 2010

333I don’t. And I’m pretty sure the editors of TIME knew that it wasn’t back in 1998 when they put it (a detail from the Shroud of Turin) on their magazine’s cover.

The linen of the Shroud had been Carbon 14 dated to AD 1260-1390 ten years earlier, in 1988.  And as it turns out, the Shroud appears for the first time in historical documents in AD 1357 in a small town in France (Lirey, not Remulak).

So you would think it would be obvious, and we (the world at large) would by now have gotten over the Shroud of Turin.

No so.  More than 2,000,000 people, including the Pope, will make pilgrimage to Turin between April 10th and May 23rd this year, to see the Shroud on display (for the first time in a decade) in the Cathedral of St. John the Baptist.

Want to hear the whole story behind the Shroud of Turin?  Come on down to the Walters on April 2nd, at 6 pm.

What’s a “VELVIS”????

Posted by Gary Vikan on Monday, February 1st, 2010

Photo: GV ("Velvis")

Photo: GV ("Velvis")

On January 23rd of this month, after four years of much notoriety and some ridicule, “Velveteria,” the one and only “velvet painting museum,” in Portland, Oregon, closed its doors. Its 300 plus paintings on velvet were a monument to a peculiar medium that seemed to have reached its apogee in Tijuana in the 1970s.

Elvis pictures have been so prevalent in this medium that they have their own term of identification: an Elvis on velvet is a “Velvis.” Why the association?  Is it simply because velvet painting is ipso facto a genre of high kitsch art and for many, Elvis Presley is the essence of kitsch?

This may explain some of the association, but probably not all of it. Think of what dominates the iconography of velvet painting, besides Elvis, naked women, and unicorns. This is an art form for charismatic martyrs, including Jesus, JFK, MLK, Michael Jackson, and Che Guevara, and for various incarnations of sad, big-eyed waifs, sad big-eyed clowns, and sad big-eyed puppies. And everywhere possible in velvet art there are tears.

The decent from canvas to velvet is the decent from pathos to bathos.

With their dark, dramatic backgrounds, and sketchy, ambiguous details, paintings on velvet are powerful agents for opening the emotional floodgates of susceptible viewers. As neuroscientists have recently discovered, our visual brain will “complete” the compositional and emotional ambiguity of works of art to suit our own sensibilities. This is part of the work and the joy of viewing art.

The sweating/weeping Elvis on velvet will be empowered by our mental workings both to capture and to evoke a profound sense of compassion and pity.

Photo: GV

Photo: GV (Elvis Icon)

As an Elvis icon (above) is created to enable viewers make conversational contact with the King, a Velvis is created to enable viewers to tap into their most profound emotions about the King.

That’s why they looks so different.

Jesus as a man of color

Posted by Gary Vikan on Friday, December 25th, 2009

KC09 030

Nobody knows what Jesus looked like.  The Bible gives no description, there are no contemporary texts describing him, and the first images in art of Jesus post-date the historical figure by nearly 300 years!

The famous Latin church father St. Augustine (d. 430) made note of this but went on to say that Christians would necessarily give a visual appearance to Jesus in their mind’s eye as they read about his life and miracles, and prayed, and this was fine.

A Patriarch of Constantinople took it one step further in the 10th century by saying that different ethnic groups of Christians around the world would give a face to Jesus that matched there own.  That was only natural.

Image 46

Christ was a Semite, so we should assume that he must have looked more like folks who nowadays live around the Mediterranean, than those who live in northern Europe.  That’s common sense.

The most frequently-reproduced image of Jesus is said to be that by Warner Sallman.  It derives from a miraculous vision he had in 1924, and was perfected in 1940.

Sallman’s Jesus is copper toned, and that makes sense.  But he’s also blue-eyed!  Which only makes sense when you discover that Warner Sallman was the son of Swedish immigrants.

Which may also explain why it was that the role of Jesus in the famous 1965 epic The Greatest Story Ever Told went to the Swedish actor Max von Sydow.

And so it goes….

The Magi are Triple-Bunked!

Posted by Gary Vikan on Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

Burgundy.Paris.2006 419

We have some pretty spectacular art in our current show, The Christmas Story: Picturing the Birth of Christ in Medieval Manuscripts. But it’s very hard to top this Romanesque limestone relief in the Cathedral of Sainte-Lazare in Autun, France.

It’s my favorite.

The Three Magi are triple-bunked, sleeping with their crowns on, perhaps so they can get an early start. The Angel of the Lord is about the necessary business of sending them on to Bethlehem, where they will give their exotic gifts to the Baby Jesus.

But the Magi’s wake-up call is ever so subtle. Just a gentle tap on a pinkie finger, and the kingly owner of that finger suddenly has his eyes wide open. Simultaneously, and above, the Angel offers a pointed reminder of the Star of Bethlehem,  that will be their guide.

Could it be any sweeter?

But don’t be mistaken, these mid-12th century French sculptors could just as skillfully show the brutality of  the Last Judgement. 

Autun, France - Last Judgement (detail)

Autun, France - Last Judgement (detail)

Is there a future for Christian art?

Posted by Gary Vikan on Monday, November 30th, 2009

The Walters Art Museum

The Walters Art Museum

Pope Benedict XVI hopes so.  In fact, just a few weeks back he invited more than 200 contemporary artists (including musicians, writers, and architects) into the Sistine Chapel to urge them to embark on a ”Quest for Beauty” (Rachael Donadio, “Benedict Woos Artists, Urging ‘Quest for Beauty’,” The New York Times, November 22). Above and behind His Holiness, powerfully driving his point home, was, of course,  Michelangelo’s Last Judgment.

AAAhhh… Those were the days, with Michelangelo and Raphael simultaneously working in the Vatican, on Papal commissions.

Cardinal Keeler, right here in Baltimore, has long advocated for a rapprochement between artists of all faiths and the Church. His dream was, and probably still is, a national competition, and an exhibition of the works of the winners.

But will it happen?  Can it happen?

Benedict has brought into the Vatican hierarchy a powerful arts advocate in Archbishop Ravisi, former director of the famous Ambrosiana Library in Milan. Ravisi’s aim is for the Vatican to have its own pavilion at the 2011 Venice Biennale.

Imagine that!

America’s renowned video artist, Bill Viola, was greatly enthused  by what he heard that day – which is not so surprising, given his powerful reinterpretation of Renaissance Christian iconography, as he creates what might best be called “altarpieces in super-slow motion.” My own favorite is Emergence, from Viola’s The Passions, organized a few years back by the Getty. 

Viola is quoted at length in The Times article, ruminating on the Church/Artist challenge, as distilled into the inherent tension between artistic freedom and “rules”  – and the artist’s need for rule bending, and even rule breaking.

But Viola sees “real potential.” 

Maybe.

Hunter-Gatherers, Michelangelo, and the Buddha

Posted by Gary Vikan on Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

IMG_8318In the Ideas & Trends section of The New York Times of  November 15th, Nicholas Wade waded into the murky waters of natural selection and religion (“The Evolution of the God Gene”). The idea is that religion – the potentiality for any and all religions – is hardwired into our brains from our hunter-gatherer days, some 50,000 years ago. Why? Because those  egalitarian groups of naked warriors from which we descend were in constant battle with their neighbors, and internal cohesion as generated by ”religious” rituals (initially dancing, later ancestor-worship, later still, the worship of solar deities) had great utility to the group’s survival. And thus, procreation.

The article was illustrated with pictures of Catholic bishops and Buddhist monks doing their respective (but fundamentally identical) things.  But the article’s editors could as will have show Michelangelo’s famous frescoes in the Sistine Chapel or a bronze Buddha from Thailand at the Walters. Since both would be, no less than the bishops and monks in action, the glittering “residue” of our hunter-gatherer ancestors’ survival rituals.