Bring Google ultra-high speed broadband to Baltimore

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

Google says it wants to build ultra-high speed broadband networks in some cities and towns in the USA. Here is a direct quote from their website:

“Google is planning to build, and test ultra-high speed broadband networks in a small number of trial locations across the country. We’ll deliver Internet speeds more than 100 times faster than what most Americans have access to today with 1 gigabit per second, fiber-to-the-home connections. We’ll offer service at a competitive price to at least 50,000, and potentially up to 500,000 people.”

There are many excited people in Baltimore who want google to select Baltimore as one of its trial cities. They have organized at the BmoreFiber site.  I love it when people get excited and organize behind a worthy cause like this one. You can also check out their facebook page.  The people behind the movement have already met with representatives of the mayor.

An ultra-fast Internet connection would make life easier and more convenient for those of us who rely on the Internet for just about everything we do.  It would also make Baltimore a much more attractive city for tech businesses and tech oriented people. Since google would be paying for this, I see this as something we all should support. There really are no negatives.

Our school system is in despair. This could be the kick start it needs that forces it to revolutionize itself.  Maybe people will WANT to send their kids to Baltimore schools because the google high-speed connections that will be available?

Speaking of kids and schools, here are two pro-google fiber videos that relate to those subjects. The third one features our Governor:

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image

The Land Bank Authority bill has been withdrawn

Posted by ameister on Monday, March 8th, 2010

At the very end of the Councilmania section of this week’s City Paper there is a paragraph that informs us that the Land Bank Authority bill has been withdrawn from the Baltimore City Council!

Over a year ago I discussed the possible land bank here. The land bank idea has been floating around city hall since at least 2007.  It was the subject of many political speeches by numerous leaders. This is another example of “Talk is cheap”.  We had a lot of land bank talk and we end up with nothing.

The root problem is still out there though. Since 2001 there has been pressure from citizens, developers, and the real estate industry to simplify the process of purchasing city owned property. Almost a decade has gone by and it is still incredibly complicated to buy property that your tax dollars support! The city is desperate for revenue yet it can not create an easy way to liquidate some of its most valuable and desirable assets.

The Senator Theatre saga continues

Posted by ameister on Thursday, March 4th, 2010

On February 19, 2010, 446 Rosebank Avenue next to the Senator Theatre went up for auction. Laura Perkins (a fan and neighbor of the Senator) won the auction with a bid of $106800. This could complicate the Senator RFP.  Below is an email from Ms. Perkins where she explains why she bought the house and her take on the RFP situation:


February 23, 2010

To whom it may concern,

On Friday, February 19th, I purchased the home and property located at 446 Rosebank Ave. at a foreclosure auction, which had been widely publicized within our community and beyond. The auction sale triggered speculation regarding my motives and my plans for the property, which is contiguous with The Senator Theatre property in the rear of the site.

I am one of the core volunteers with the Friends of The Senator Theatre group, and I share the group’s rising concerns over the flawed Senator RFP process that the Baltimore Development Corporation is conducting. I was also the sole Friends of The Senator representative on the BDC’s RFP advisory panel.

Despite serious past concerns over the manner in which Baltimore City acquired ownership of The Senator, I resolved to approach with optimism the city’s RFP evaluation process and I extended the BDC leadership the benefit of the doubt. I hoped for a thorough process that would give unbiased objective evaluation to the proposals. I quickly became alarmed, however, over the inappropriate secrecy of the RFP process and the BDC’s repeated flat refusals to allow bona fide historic theatre redevelopment and film industry professionals to consult with the RFP panel. From my perspective, the BDC’s insular and uninformed stance puts both The Senator’s future and over a million dollars in scarce city taxpayer funds at great risk.

It’s a scandalous situation, and in response, I pointedly resigned in protest from the RFP panel. My resignation came shortly after the BDC leaders stated that the 446 Rosebank Ave property, which Tom Kiefaber acquired 15 years ago because he believes it is critical to The Senator’s future, has no real significance to the two Senator RFPs under consideration. As a Senator RFP panel member, I knew this was false information.

That inaccurate assertion, like many previous BDC pronouncements, was clearly intended to mislead the citizens of Baltimore by using the media and our city council representatives to spread disinformation. Combined with the BDC’s refusal to consult with qualified experts in evaluating the RFPs, it was the last straw.

I’ve now personally inhabited a back room at the BDC and experienced first hand how this quasi-public agency effectively fosters incorrect beliefs among a jaded public, by trading in false and misleading information. A recent Pew Center for Excellence in Journalism study of key news stories in Baltimore, including the auction of The Senator Theatre, noted that the downsizing Baltimore media rarely fulfills its fourth estate mandate to verify the accuracy of the government’s statements.

I am relatively new here in Baltimore, and I still cling to our nation’s diminishing democratic ideals, the constitution, and the private property rights of each and every citizen. I blog as “Astrogirl,” and I spent much of the past year investigating how a few powerful individuals in city government and at the BDC have repeatedly abused Tom Kiefaber and violated his civil rights, while misrepresenting the situation to the media in ways intended to defame and undermine his professional reputation. The inaccuracy of the BDC’s past attacks on Mr. Kiefaber was shockingly easy to discover, and it chilled me to the bone to learn how Baltimore’s embedded culture of corruption and manipulation operates with seeming impunity.

The research has opened my eyes, and once I saw Baltimore’s “shadow government” in action, it was apparent that enough is enough. Someone from our community other than Tom Kiefaber has to step up, as he has done over the years despite threats of retribution, and take an overt, public stand against the abuse of governmental power in Baltimore City by the BDC and the city government. Where I come from, local government and their related institutions don’t assume they can indulge in this level of corrupt manipulation, because the citizens will ultimately stand up to be counted and do something about it.

I acted on my convictions last Friday and bought the 446 Rosebank Ave. property at auction, as the only private bidder. A BDC representative was present to observe the auction of the property they deemed inconsequential. As the successful bidder, I plan to assert my rights as the adjacent residential property owner to The Senator and occupy a legitimate seat at the table as the Senator RFP situation unfolds.

I stepped up for good reason, because The Senator’s passionate past protector and steward has been neutralized and sidelined, and the theatre’s future is at stake and endangered by the politically tainted Senator RFP selection process.

I do not agree in the slightest with the BDC’s public and private assertion that 446 Rosebank Ave. is inconsequential to the RFP process, and the pointed inquiries I’ve received in the past few days validate my firm belief that Mr. Kiefaber was right all along. The 446 property is logistically, geographically, and strategically linked to The Senator Theatre and its future. That will undoubtedly become more apparent to all as things evolve.

Increasing my vested ownership stake in the community at this time should indicate that I am determined to help ensure that the future of The Senator Theatre will ultimately be decided through an open and transparent historic theatre redevelopment process, and not the shrouded RFP sham currently being perpetrated by the Baltimore Development Corporation.

Sincerely,

Laura Perkins

Purchaser of 446 Rosebank Ave.

Baltimore should get rid of The Block

Posted by ameister on Monday, March 1st, 2010

Large amounts of nonprofit and tax payer money are being spent on fixing the problems associated with the illegal activities that Baltimore allows to take place only a few blocks away from city hall on “The Block”. It is an embarrassment that citizens who visit government buildings on Fayette street have to sometimes exit on to sketchy Baltimore street where they are harassed by people conducting shady and illegal activities.

It says a lot about our government when prostitution and drugs are allowed to run rampant a few blocks away from the center of Baltimore city government. Corruption is the first word that comes to mind.  There is no doubt in my mind that some of the establishments on the Block are owned by politically connected individuals. The odd thing is that other politically connected individuals own legitimate businesses around the corner at Power Plant Live and other places nearby. One would think that the legitimate business owners would have bribed their way (pay-to-play) in to convincing our leaders to get rid of the establishments catering to those dealing with illegal activities.  The real estate on the Block (if there was little to no adult entertainment) is some of the most valuable in Baltimore. It could be a source of pride and incredible tax revenue for Baltimore instead of the disgrace that it currently is.

I think the Block should be turned into a regulated Bourbon Street type of area where you could still find nude dancers, but the establishments would not encourage and support illegal drug use. The shady establishments with long sordid histories would be encouraged to leave and non-nude bars and clubs that would have to purchase expensive 4AM liquor licenses would take their places. You would end up with properly run nude bars closing at 2AM mixed in with new clubs and bars open until 4AM. There would be strict sanitation rules enforced on the new and improved (and possibly expanded) block and there would be a few apartment rentals scattered in also. Baltimore would end up with a new tourist attraction that would generate new tax revenue for the city. We would also end up with a much cleaner and less shady block.

Should drinking hours be extended at certain downtown alcohol selling establishments and at strip clubs?

Posted by ameister on Friday, February 26th, 2010

It looks like Delegate Nathaniel Oaks introduced this bill for the benefit of adult entertainment establishments.You can read more about the Baltimore City – Alcoholic Beverages Establishments – Weekend Closing Hours Bill (House Bill 429) here and here. A summary of House Bill 429 is below:

“This bill extends the hours that alcoholic beverages may be sold in certain licensed establishments in Baltimore City from 2 a.m. until 3 a.m. on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. Eligible establishments must hold either a Class B-D-7 license or a Class B beer, wine, and liquor license. In addition, the establishments must have been issued an adult entertainment permit from the city or be located in a specified area of Baltimore City near the Inner Harbor. The bill also allows individuals to consume alcoholic beverages on the premises of these establishments until 4 a.m.

The bill takes effect July 1, 2010.”

I support extending drinking hours in non-residential areas, but this bill is clearly flawed (and adult entertainment-centric).  I see no point in rewarding every strip club in Baltimore (no matter where they are located) with later drinking hours. It is not going to pass. This bill would extend drinking hours in many bars in Federal Hill (a residential neighborhood). That area is already saturated with drunks on the weekends and it does not need such a spark to increase business. It will only be a nuisance there. A proper  drinking hours extension bill should not include areas like Federal Hill and it should create a new variation of the BD-7 license that establishments would have to purchase that  could easily be revoked with citizen protest. Extended drinking hours is a privileged that establishments should pay for and that the city and state should profit from.

Any future bill should continue to focus around the Harbor, but it should also look at other parts of the city where extended drinking hours would create economic development  opportunities (a new 4AM entertainment zone in a now industrial part of Baltimore?).

I think it is positive that extended drinking hours are at least being discussed in the House of Delegates. It’s better than trying to make money off of slots.

If you are wondering why this bill has an excessive adult entertainment provision it in…

Candidates Account Contributor Name(Address) Amount Date Received Contribution Type
Oaks, Nathaniel Committee To Re-Elect Eldorado Lounge, Inc

(4100 E. Lombard Street ,

Baltimore, MD, 21224)

$200.00 10/20/2009 Business Entity

Remarks: fundraiser

Oaks, Nathaniel Committee To Re-Elect Eldorado Lounge, Inc

(4100 E. Lombard Street ,

Baltimore, MD, 21224)

$500.00 10/19/2008 Business Entity

Remarks: contribution

Oaks, Nathaniel Committee To Re-Elect Eldorado Lounge, Inc

(4100 E. Lombard Street ,

Baltimore, MD, 21224)

$1,000.00 01/08/2007 Ticket purchases by Business Entity

Remarks: donation

Oaks, Nathaniel Committee To Re-Elect Eldorado Lounge

( 4100 E. Lombard St.,

Baltimore, MD, 21224)

$500.00 10/26/2004 Ticket purchases by Business Entity

Remarks: donation

Our local elected officials need to stop taking money from public unions

Posted by ameister on Thursday, February 25th, 2010

The SEIU (Service Employee Union International) contributes millions of dollars to political campaigns in Maryland and they are rewarded with candidates bending over backwards and promising their union members all sorts of benefits at the expense of the taxpayer. The current system is about to implode, local jurisdictions and states can no longer afford to pay public workers (many of of whom do no do productive work) inflated salaries and generous pensions.

Here is a link to an article about a Democratic strategist who could no longer stay quiet about the SEIU’s thug-like behavior.The following quote from the article pretty much sums up my feelings about public unions:

“Caddell said he was not attacking government employees but that the system “has grown into something far beyond what it should be.”

“How are you going to tell a person who makes $40,000 that they must pay money to make sure that people keep jobs who make $80,000, roughly, and who have defined pensions that they will never see?” Caddell said. “You cannot ask ordinary Americans who have no jobs, whose pensions have been ransacked, and whose pay has been stagnant, to keep rewarding people who don’t face the same kind of conditions and risk.”

“The people who pay for it are suffering,” he said. “The taxpayers are going to explode. This is the big coming issue of our time.”

MISH’S Global Economic Trend Analysis had this to say about the article:

“This is indeed the big issue. Cities and states are insolvent because politicians buy votes from public unions. There is no one to speak for the taxpayer who gets the shaft.”

Please take the time to read this excellent union article also.

The SEIU contributed $23,350.00 to Sheila Dixon’s campaign war-chest from 2003 to 2009:

Candidates Account Contributor Name(Address) Amount Date Received Contribution Type
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU MD/DC State Council PAC

(3700 Koppers St Ste 410,

Baltimore, MD, 21227-1045)

$1,000.00 06/12/2009 MD PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU Local 500 PAC

(973 Russell Ave Ste A,

Gaithersburg, MD, 20879-3292)

$150.00 06/03/2009 MD PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU MD/DC State Council PAC

(3700 Koppers St Ste 410,

Baltimore, MD, 21227-1045)

$1,000.00 03/31/2009 MD PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU Local 32BJ NY/NJ American Dream Fund

(101 Avenue Of The Americas ,

New York, NY, 10013-1941)

$350.00 06/11/2008 Out of State PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU Local 32BJ NY/NJ American Dream Fund

(101 Avenue Of The Americas ,

New York, NY, 10013-1941)

$250.00 11/14/2007 Out of State PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU MD/DC State Council

(3700 Koppers St Ste 410,

Baltimore, MD, 21227-1045)

$1,000.00 09/09/2007 MD PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU Local 400 PG COPE Account

(5132 Baltimore Avenue ,

Hyattsville, MD, 20781)

$100.00 08/31/2007 MD PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU Local 500 PAC

(973 Russell Ave Ste A,

Gaithersburg, MD, 20879-3292)

$500.00 08/28/2007 MD PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU Local 500 PAC

(973 Russell Ave Ste A,

Gaithersburg, MD, 20879-3292)

$500.00 08/03/2007 MD PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU MD/DC State Council

(3700 Koppers St Ste 410,

Baltimore, MD, 21227-1045)

$2,000.00 08/01/2007 MD PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU Local 32BJ NY/NJ American Dream Fund

(101 Avenue Of The Americas ,

New York, NY, 10013-1941)

$3,000.00 07/20/2007 Out of State PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For 1199 SEIU NYS Political Action Fund

(330 West 42nd Street, 7th Floor ,

New York, NY, 10036)

$6,000.00 07/03/2007 Out of State PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU 1199

(611 North Eutaw Street ,

Baltimore, MD, 21201-4514)

$2,000.00 11/20/2006 Out of State PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU PEA INTERNATIONAL

(1313 L. ST. N.W. ,

WASHINGTON, DC, 20005)

$4,000.00 09/11/2003 Business Entity
Dixon, Sheila Friends For SEIU-LOS ANGELES HOMECARE WORKERS UNION LOCAL 434-B STATE PA

(2515 BEVERLY BLVD. ,

LOS ANGELES, CA, 90057)

$500.00 09/10/2003 Out of State PAC
Dixon, Sheila Friends For 1199 SEIU PAC

(310 WESTN 43RD ST. ,

NEW YORK, NY, 10036)

$1,000.00 09/05/2003 Out of State PAC

Similar story with the current mayor:

Candidates Account Contributor Name(Address) Amount Date Received Contribution Type
Rawlings-Blake, Stephanie For Baltimore SEIU MD/DC State Council PAC

(605 North Eutaw Street ,

Baltimore, MD, 21201)

$500.00 10/20/2008 MD PAC

Remarks: chk 1111 dtd 9/15/08

Rawlings-Blake, Stephanie For Baltimore Local 32BJ SEIU NY/NJ American Dream Fund

(101 Avenue of the Americas ,

New york, NY, 10013)

$500.00 06/06/2008 Business Entity

Remarks: chk 2659 dtd 4/4/08

Rawlings-Blake, Stephanie For Baltimore Local 32BJ SEIU NY/NJ American Dream Fund

(101 Avenue of the Americas ,

New york, NY, 10013)

$1,000.00 09/06/2007 Business Entity
Rawlings-Blake, Stephanie For Baltimore SEIU MD/DC State Council PAC

(605 North Eutaw Street ,

Baltimore, MD, 21201)

$1,000.00 09/06/2007 MD PAC
Rawlings-Blake, Stephanie For Baltimore SEIU Local 500 PAC

(973-A Russell Avenue ,

Gaithersburg, MD, 20879)

$300.00 08/28/2007 MD PAC
Rawlings-Blake, Stephanie For Baltimore 1199 SEIU NYS Political Action Fund

(PO Box 2612 ,

New York, NY, 10108)

$4,500.00 08/24/2007 Out of State PAC
Rawlings-Blake, Stephanie For Baltimore SEIU MD/DC State Council PAC

(605 North Eutaw Street ,

Baltimore, MD, 21201)

$1,000.00 08/07/2007 MD PAC
Rawlings-Blake, Stephanie Friends Of 1199 SEIU

(P.O. BOX 2612 ,

NEW YORK, NY, 10108)

$1,000.00 05/14/2007 Out of State PAC

Council President Jack Young:

Candidates Account Contributor Name(Address) Amount Date Received Contribution Type
Young, Bernard C. Friends Of 1199 SEIU

(POLITICAL ACTION FUND 310 WESTN 43RD STREET,

N32 YORK, NY, 10036)

$1,000.00 04/24/2007 MD PAC
Young, Bernard C. Friends Of 1199 SEIU

(POLITICAL ACTION FUND 310 WESTN 43RD STREET,

N32 YORK, NY, 10036)

$500.00 09/30/2003 MD PAC

The Governor:

Candidates Account Contributor Name(Address) Amount Date Received Contribution Type
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of SEIU Local 500- MCCSSE

(973-A Russell Ave ,

Gaithersburg, MD, 20879)

$500.00 10/21/2007 MD PAC
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of SEIU MD/DC State Council PAC

(605 N. Eutaw Street ,

Baltimore, MD, 21201)

$2,000.00 10/21/2007 MD PAC
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of 1199 SEIU NYS Political Action Fund

(330 W 42nd St 330 West 42nd Street,

New York, NY, 10036-6902)

$6,000.00 09/25/2007 Federal Committees
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of SEIU Local 32BJ PAC

(101 Avenue of the Americas ,

New York, NY, 10013)

$3,000.00 09/06/2006 Out of State PAC
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of SEIU Local 500- MCCSSE

(973-A Russell Ave ,

Gaithersburg, MD, 20879)

$5,000.00 08/30/2006 MD PAC
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of SEIU DC/MD State Council No. 54 PAC

(6108 Old Silver Hill Rd Ste 218 Suite 401,

Forestville, MD, 20747-2150)

$6,000.00 08/07/2006 MD PAC
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of SEIU Local 500- MCCSSE

(973-A Russell Ave ,

Gaithersburg, MD, 20879)

$1,000.00 07/28/2006 MD PAC
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of 1199 SEIU NYS Political Action Fund

(Attn: Jennifer Cunningham 330 West 42nd Street,

New York, NY, 10036)

$4,000.00 12/27/2005 Out of State PAC
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of 1199 SEIU NYS Political Action Fund

(Attn: Jennifer Cunningham 330 West 42nd Street,

New York, NY, 10036)

$839.25 12/19/2005 Out of State PAC

Remarks: Food/beverage

O’Malley, Martin Friends Of 1199 SEIU NYS Political Action Fund

(Attn: Jennifer Cunningham 330 West 42nd Street,

New York, NY, 10036)

$1,000.00 12/19/2005 Out of State PAC

Remarks: Room Rental

O’Malley, Martin Friends Of NYC Local 246 SEIU

(217 Broadway ,

New York, NY, 10007)

$250.00 12/15/2005 Out of State PAC
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of Local 82 – SEIU

(1220 13th St. NW ,

Washington, MD, 20005)

$500.00 05/13/2003 Ticket purchases by Business Entity
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of Local 63 NCOF & SEIU

(6409 Landover Rd Suite B,

Landover, MD, 20785)

$470.56 05/12/2003 MD PAC
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of SEIU District 1199E-DC, AFL-CIO, CLC

(611 N. Eutaw 2nd Floor ,

Baltimore, MD, 21201)

$2,000.00 05/12/2003 Ticket purchases by Business Entity
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of SEIU

(611 North Eutaw Street 2nd Level,

Baltimore, MD, 21201)

$500.00 05/29/2001 Ticket purchases by Business Entity
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of SEIU Local 500- MCCSSE

(973-A Russell Ave. ,

Baltimore, MD, 20879)

$500.00 09/09/1999 Business Entity
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of SEIU DC/MD State Council No. 54 PAC

(6108 Old Silver Hill Rd. Suite 218,

Forestville, MD, 20747)

$1,000.00 09/09/1999 MD PAC

My review of the state of the city speech

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Mayor Rawlings-Blake rocked Sheila Dixon on Monday! Her speech was head and shoulders above Dixon’s speech from last year. The real question is if this Mayor can bring about the radical (for Baltimore at least) change that she spoke about in her speech.

The event started out in classic Baltimore fashion with City Council President Jack Young stumbling through his opening statements. The man is not a good public speaker. The Mayor’s mastery of her speech made his words seem even more lacking than they originally appeared. Young had a nice light suit on though. That was a positive I guess. Young gave the mayor flowers before her speech.

Since politicians have huge egos they had to introduce all the visiting politicians that were in attendance. Elijah Cummings, Curt Anderson, Melvin Stukes, Joan Pratt, union leader Glen Middleton , a firefighters’ union rep, a school union rep, a police union rep, Judge Holland, and Helen Bentley were all announced. Patricia Jessamy was not there. I was worried that with all those union people present that the Mayor would promise them benefits at the expense of the taxpayer. She did not even come close to doing that though.

The Mayor got down to business right away. The differences between her style of speaking and Dixon’s style were noticeable immediately. The mayor spoke in a clear calm voice. Her speech was to the point, short yet concise, and forward looking. She actually brought up non-fluff topics that could cause controversy! You can watch the entire speech here. After watching this speech one has to wonder why we were not embarrassed by the former Mayor every time she spoke. Yesterday’s speech was a breath of fresh air on so many different levels. It was a new beginning and a renewal of a kind of Baltimore pride that had been lacking during the Dixon years.

After the light business suit wearing Mayor thanked her benefactors (O’Malley and Cummings) she jumped right into a subject that Dixon had avoided- Property taxes! The Mayor is sending a signal to the citizens that she is very much aware of the fiscal problems of this city and that property taxes are one of the biggest economic problems many citizens deal with. It was refreshing to at least hear that this mayor cares about basic municipal economics and fiscal responsibility.

“$120 million equals twenty-two-hundred City employees or 55% of our civilian workforce.”

If I were her I would try to fire as many of them as possible in order to make up the impending $120 million deficit.

“Mark these words, remember them and factor them into our actions and decisions in the coming days: This $120 million deficit is brutal and will hit all of our citizens hard. I speak plainly and bluntly. If we sugar coat our problems, we will never rise above and solve them.”

The Mayor did what I thought she would not do, she straight up told us we had a problem that would be painful to fix. She even brought up the always hush-hush “pension time-bomb”.  He speech was not union-friendly! I was shocked.

“Chief among these sacrifices is pension reform for police officers and firefighters.”

Wow! Has someone from the Mayor’s office been reading this blog?

“Despite a deficit equal to a thirty-six cent increase on the property tax rate, if we work together, we can pledge we will not raise property taxes to fix this budget gap.”

Bravo!!!!

“Finally, I’m cutting the entire Mayor’s Office budget by 10%. We will do more with less.”

Has mild fiscal responsibility really returned to Baltimore? Please let the Mayor’s words turn into actions!

The transcript of the Mayor’s speech can be found here.

Vacated 12th District City Council seat hearing

Posted by ameister on Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Today at 5PM “The Vacancy Nominating Committee for the Baltimore City Council” will hold a public hearing at City Hall in the Du Burns Council Chamber. This “public interview” is required by law and it will help determine who the council will select to fill the empty 12th district seat that Council President Jack Young formerly occupied. More information about this hearing can be found on the front page of the Baltimore City Council site. I checked the site early last week and saw no mention of this hearing, but when I checked this weekend it was up. I was caught a little off guard (I thought I would have more time to prepare) and I probably will only be able to attend part of the hearing because of a previous commitment. All eyewitness accounts of the event are welcome. Email them here.

The City Paper gives a good rundown of who is interested in the seat. It would be nice if the city posted applicants’ names online as they receive their applications. I have heard the following people have interest: Carl Stokes, Aaron Keith Wilkes, Ertha Harris, Frank Richardson, Robert Stokes, and Pam Carter.

I sent out the following email to all of the above names except Robert Stokes and Pam Carter (I do not have their email addresses, please spread the word to them if you know them):

“I want to give every one of you the opportunity to write about why you think you should represent the 12th district. It can be as long as you want. I will dedicate a post to every one of you who wants to participate. I am trying to post them before the hearing on Tuesday at 5PM. The sooner you send them to me, the sooner they will be posted.”

I have yet to receive a reply.

Carl Stokes is the “favorite” because he has served on city council in the past and he ran for mayor in 1999.  He is definitely part of the political machine and the council loves to stick with known commodities and the status quo.  There are members of the current council who are friends with him. They are all about selecting one of their own over a fresh outsider. If one member of the City Council stands up and votes for an outsider then it will be newsworthy. These things are usually very predictable.

Report from Saturday’s Bmore United rally

Posted by ameister on Monday, February 22nd, 2010

The long awaited Bmore United rally took place on Saturday at 2PM. We gathered in front of City Hall and ended up in front of police headquarters. The crowd was late arriving and peaked at over thirty people. It was a good turnout.  The crowd had some notable people in it.

I arrived at 2PM (I ran down there) and NAACP local president Doc Cheatham was already there talking to rally organizer Chris Taylor. I have never seen Cheatham in such ordinary clothes. He was not his usual flamboyant self. He was polite and reserved the entire time. He was handing out yellow whistles with NAACP and census logos on them. He was trying to promote the Census. I also heard him mention his interest in running for a House of Delegate’s seat in the 44th district. I brought this subject up in a previous post of mine. He is a politically savvy man.

Aaron Keith Wilkes was also there when I arrived. The Darley Park resident wants to take over Council President Young’s former 12th district seat in City Council. The City Council gets to select Young’s replacement and people were mentioning that Carl Stokes will be selected by the council. I will write more about the 12th district on Tuesday, but it is typical of the City Council to want to appoint one of their own (an insider who has already been on the council and is friends with some members) instead of new blood.

When thirty people were there Chris Taylor gave a little speech, he wants people who support Bmore United’s version of change to run in every city council district in the 2011 election. Everyone gathered in a circle and held hands as a man said a very long prayer to Jesus. The hand holding thing really was not necessary and it bothered me on a lot of levels. The mixing of Church and State is a technique of the establishment and I would advise all “rebel groups” to try and avoid it.

Participants were then given signs and we marched to police headquarters. Many cars honked in support as they drove by. Investigative Voice had three people covering the event.  Here is Investigative Voice’s summary of the rally. They were also giving out flyers for their one year anniversary event that will take place at Red Maple this Wednesday at 6PM. Sheila Dixon will be the special guest (this will be her first public appearance since she left office). Tickets are $20.

I know there was a candidate for Baltimore City Sheriff there. I think it was Frances Hamilton. A man named Gary M. Collins was also there. I had seen Mr. Collins at the Dixon Pension Protest also. Collins is a 3rd councilmanic representative on the Baltimore City Republican Central Committee. He is young, smart, and energetic. I got the feeling that he will run a serious campaign for City Council in the third district in 2011. I stress the word serious because Republicans usually do not try very hard in Baltimore. I predict that if he runs he will have the best showing for a republican in a city election in years.

The rally helped organize the growing Bmore United Movement. A sign up sheet was passed around. Chris Taylor hopes to have a future event with double the attendees. This movement is something to keep an eye on.

Higher property taxes for vacant houses in Baltimore

Posted by ameister on Thursday, February 18th, 2010

State Senator George Della of the 46th District filed Senate Bill 889 a few days ago. The bill’s goals are to encourage vacant property owners to renovate their properties and to possibly generate enough tax revenue to lead to a reduction in the overall property tax rate.  I think it is a good first step in altering Baltimore’s property tax structure.  I do not think it will be able to generate enough revenue to lower the property tax rate in the city and I fear revenue that it might generate will be used on wasteful new programs. It is worth a try though.

I think it is also worth it to directly reward Baltimore homeowner occupants with a drastic property tax cut. I feel this would be the most beneficial move the city could make. Home ownership costs would decrease if the owner occupant property tax rate was dropped drastically and the result would be more interest in being a Baltimore city homeowner. Higher property taxes for vacant and uninhabitable real property in Baltimore will make investors think about selling or renovating but that does not necessarily mean new home owner occupants. If this bill becomes law then vacant and uninhabitable real property prices will drop and I feel that is a positive.

I received an email from a reader who does not like this bill. Here are his reasons (he describes why a supporter likes this bill at first):

“Basically what happened to him was he bought into a neighborhood that was half – three quarters redeveloped and paid a pretty penny for his place and
has high taxes. The real estate bubble burst and projects in his area went
on hold. It upsets him to come outside and see projects not completed. He
now wants these developers to pay higher taxes.

This is against everything I was taught about the tax system. And in general
is just vindictive. It also will make the rich richer and keep the poor
poor. Any fledgling developer will need more money to start into the market.
I just think it is a bad idea. I call it the “ugly tax” because if your
property is ugly it gets charged more.”