Archive for July, 2010

Larry Gibson emails me about Patricia Jessamy

Posted by ameister on Friday, July 30th, 2010

Larry Gibson was campaign manager for Mayor Kurt Schmoke in 1987, 1991, and 1995. Here is a quote from a City Paper article that gives some insight into the 1995 Mayor’s race:

“In the eyes of many observers, politics began taking precedence over policy even before Schmoke was elected to his third term. The 1995 campaign’s MAYOR SCHMOKE MAKES US PROUD bumper stickers created a storm of criticism by employing the colors of African nationalism, an apparent appeal to consolidate the mayor’s African-American base in what was expected to be a tight race against a popular white candidate, then-council president Mary Pat Clarke. “It was the ‘running scared’ election,” one City Hall staffer says. “They were desperate.”

The mayor’s defenders argue that too much was made of the stickers, and place the blame outside the mayor’s office. “That wasn’t in Kurt,” Cunningham says. “He stayed out of all the political stuff. That had to be Larry [Gibson] and Danny [Henson]‘s doing.”

It appears that Gibson has taken an interest in the current Baltimore State’s Attorney’s race. He sent me the following email last Friday night:

Patricia Jessamy’s contributions to the decrease in crime



Between 1995 and 2009, Baltimore City ’s population decreased 9%, but crime decreased 59% according to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports. The police, judges, elected officials, and community leaders have all contributed to this decrease. But, the most consistent factor during these years has been State’s Attorney Patricia Jessamy.



No bail for repeat violent offenders - There is less crime because there are fewer criminals on the streets. Jessamy’s “War Room” has been an increasingly effective crime prevention program that keeps repeat violent offenders in jail without bail until their cases comes up in court.



Jessamy’s lawyers have had phenomenal success convincing bail commissioners and judges to deny bail to 90% of the repeat violent offenders they review. From 2005 to 2009, War Room intervention kept 7,292 repeat violent offenders in jail waiting their court dates. We will never know many thousands of additional crimes these offenders would have committed if they had been on the streets instead of in jail.



Mandatory no parole sentences - Jessamy and her staff have been very aggressive and effective in obtaining mandatory no parole sentences. Her Firearms Investigation Violence Enforcement (FIVE) unit has obtained more than 1,800 mandatory five-year no parole sentences against convicted felons found with a gun. Jessamy was the principal architect of the law passed by the 2000 General Assembly that imposes this strict penalty, even if the gun has not been used. This program has imprisoned violent criminals, deterred others from carrying guns, and decreased crime.



Jessamy’s prosecutors have also routinely sought and obtained mandatory five-year no parole sentences under a different law that covers the use of a handgun while committing a crime. These cases often involve nonfatal shootings, armed robberies and carjackings, all of which have decreased in Baltimore City .



Project EXILE Jessamy’s staff also obtains mandatory sentences in federal court under a creative program she created called EXILE. Some of her assistants also become federal prosecutors and bring cases that require federal law or resources. The persons convicted are often leaders of violent drug and gang organizations who are then sent to federal penal institutions outside of Maryland . Their exiles have reduced crime in Baltimore .



Other successful Jessamy programs - Jessamy has done many other things that have reduced crime. For example, Jessamy created a Forensics Unit to train prosecutors in the use of forensic science, created the TREES program to assist young offenders to obtain educational and support services and avoid becoming career criminals, partnered with federal law enforcement agencies to dismantle violent gangs, and created the Felony Family Violence Unit that focusing on child abuse and domestic violence.


Larry S. Gibson

The major talking points that Mr. Gibson brings up in this letter are the same ones that the Jessamy campaign and Jessamy supporters keep repeating. Get used to hearing them.

Jessamy tells her partygoers (including Cummings):”Not everybody needs to be in jail”

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

On Sunday the Baltimore Rowing Club hosted Patricia Jessamy’s birthday party. Doni Glover of Bmorenews.com covered the event here.  Investigative Voice also covered the event.  At the party Jessamy gave a speech that you can watch below. In the speech she mentions numerous political people who were at the party including Congressman Elijah Cummings (mentioned at the 1:06 mark) and Lieutenant Governor Brown. This speech really says it all. I suggest you watch the entire thing. At the 5:32 mark in the video she says “you gotta set priorities you gotta identify who goes to jail because not everybody needs to be in jail.”

A few hours after the party Johns Hopkins research assistant Stephen Pitcairn was walking home on Saint Paul Street. Pitcairn was approached by two people who ended up robbing him and stabbing him to death. The suspects in his murder are described by the Baltimore Sun this way:

Lavelva Merritt, 24, and John Alexander Wagner, 34, charged with first-degree murder in the stabbing death of Stephen Pitcairn, have lengthy criminal histories and have been passing through the region’s justice system for years, seemingly without repercussion.

Both of these people should have been in jail.

Here is video of the speech:

YouTube Preview Image

More from this year’s party:

YouTube Preview Image

Kurt Schmoke and Jessamy:

YouTube Preview Image

Jessamy was also partying at the Baltimore Rowing Club last year:

YouTube Preview Image

Here is a classic from two year ago:

YouTube Preview Image

Pigtown beating aftermath video

Posted by ameister on Monday, July 26th, 2010

The following video is part two of this story. Investigative Voice also came out with a story about this incident.

This video speaks for itself. Spread the word and maybe things will change:

YouTube Preview Image

The city council needs to forget about its suicidal living wage idea

Posted by ameister on Friday, July 23rd, 2010

So we are in the middle of the worst of economic recession anyone can remember and our leaders want to drive away businesses from Baltimore by forcing larger retailers to pay employees a $10.59 living wage that will be passed along in the form of higher prices to the poor consumers of the city.  This is the same city council that bemoans the fact that Baltimore has so few major supermarkets.

Big companies can locate anywhere they want to. They can pay people $8 an hour or they can not relocate to your city. So here are our choices: $8 an hour jobs or NO JOBS! This city needs jobs. Beggars can’t be choosers!  Stop pandering for votes from mathematically deficient people who think that they are going to benefit from this.

Now I HATE federal government spending, but down in Howard County there are many “organizations” affiliated with our “war on terror” that are employing many intelligent well paid bureaucrats. Howard County is very much a part of the Baltimore metro area. Would you rather bring your business to an area being fueled by steroidal government growth or would you rather deal with a city like Baltimore that is already filled with many problems, taxes, and regulations? Even without this horrible living wage idea we are at a HUGE disadvantage when compared to our neighboring counties. Why further handicap ourselves? Stop trying to please your union masters and do something that is right for people who just want jobs! Do not interfere with private sector jobs and the free market.

I am not a fan of Donald Fry, but he is right about this.

If we keep on coming up with ways of driving away the tax base and increasing government programs then we are going to end up like Newark very soon:

YouTube Preview Image

Marriage and other issues that are used to distract voters

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Fifteen minutes ago my voicemail  recorded an automated message that asked me:

“Do you agree that marriage should be legal only between one man and one woman in America?”

The National Organization for Marriage paid for this survey. They will be in Annapolis today. This is the third time they have left this message on my voicemail. The definition of marriage in America has become a huge issue. The mainstream media constantly addresses it, people join facebook groups that pertain to it, young people who do not follow politics debate and talk about it, and now I am receiving phone surveys about it. Most people out there cannot balance a check book and do not understand interest rates, but they can give you a strong opinion about who and what should be considered married.

Marriage is a religious institution that has become politicized. I have pointed out that in Baltimore many of our leaders love to bring up religious symbols and sayings in order to distract the population from issues directly impacting their lives. Church membership is more important than mathematical ability. This national marriage debate is something that Baltimore’s City council and mayor cannot alter. At every level of government and in every aspect of our lives there is an ongoing economic crisis that is threatening to send society in chaos and politicians want to talk about marriage. At every level of government our leaders can install fiscal restraints that could easily make our future economic situation less catastrophic.

Somebody out there donated the money to the National Organization for Marriage that paid for the telephone surveys I have received over the last few days. That person probably cares a lot about marriage issues. I don’t think that marriage is a non-issue, but I think that exposing the economic realities that most of our leaders and mainstream media refuse to address or understand is a much higher priority that deserves funding. Everyone out there needs to learn how to prioritize issues so that our leaders can no longer hide from the most pressing of economic matters. Do not let emotional issues blind you from economic realities. I think both sides of the marriage debate would agree that a same-sex marriage in a city up in flames due to economically induced social unrest (riots) would not be a pleasant situation with which to deal.

My jury duty experience

Posted by ameister on Monday, July 19th, 2010

Last Tuesday I spent my day downtown at the Mitchell courthouse. I was supposed to arrive for jury duty at 8:15 AM. I walked into the Saint Paul street entrance exactly at 8:15 and there was a line leading up to the metal detector. Sign up sheets were being passed around. I brought my own pen and this came in handy. The sign up sheet asked the basic questions and also asked a lot of question about crimes you may have committed in the past. This sheet was the one of the last ways a person could get out of serving on a jury. I did not want to get out of serving. I know that Baltimore needs good jurors and I wanted to be a part of the process. Most people in attendance did not seem happy about being there. I overheard quite a few people trying to think of ways to “escape”.

I guess I know a lot of people because I knew five other people who were called to jury duty on Tuesday. I thought there would be a lot of destitute looking people in attendance, but there actually was a broad cross section of Baltimore in the jury pool that day. I saw Whites, Blacks, Jews (some orthodox), Asians, poor, wealthy, smart, and ignorant.

After we made it through the metal detector we were sent to two large rooms with TV monitors. I had a very low number so I was called to get my $15 pay and hand in my sign up sheet early on. I was given three five-dollar bills and told to wait for my number to be called again. There was also a “quiet room” where people could wait and not talk. People were reading and on laptops in here. I saw two men reading from Talmud! I spent a lot of my time in this room dozing off (I only slept 4 hours the night before). In one of the rooms where you could talk I overheard one guy saying he had skipped jury duty six times in the past, but he had to go this time or they would “make him”. I heard some other funny ways of getting out of jury duty in this room. One man talked about how in the past he had come to a quick decision just so he did not have to be part of a jury for more than a day or two. I will say that most people seemed like they would be as fair as possible. The people with time constraints seemed like they would just go with the majority.

Since I had a low number I was part of the first batch of people who were called upstairs to be potential jurors. We all sat in a nicely air conditioned court room with a judge, two lawyers and their clients. This case was about a car accident between a cab and another car. The judge asked us some weeding out questions: Do you know any of the people related to this case? Have you heard about this case before? Have you been injured in an accident? Do you know any of the other potential jurors in the room? I actually knew another one of the potential jurors. Both of us stood up and reported to the judge and the two lawyers at the front of the room. They asked us if we would be fair even though we knew each other and if we would talk about the case outside of the courtroom. They seemed happy with our answer. This trial only needed six jurors and an alternate. We were not picked. I think I was not picked because I answered yes to the do you know anyone else in this jury pool question. I think the lawyers did not want to take any chances and only picked jurors who did not stand out in any way.

They let us out for Lunch at about 12:30 (I can’t remember the exact time now). We had a 75 minute lunch break. They opened up a court museum inside the courthouse during this period. I saw four people (including) me walk in to take a look around this room. I walked outside for a little while. Many people spent their $15 at this point. I am very picky about my food so I did not eat. I had planned well so I pocketed my $15. If you are hungry or if you pay for parking your $15 gets spent quickly.

From the end of lunch until 4PM everyone just sat in the waiting rooms. No other trials needed juries (I thought that was odd since I we always hear about how crowded the dockets are). They showed us a movie and I drifted in and out of sleep. I wish I had a laptop. At 4PM they announced that they were about to call a lot of us for another trial but they were just kidding! It was a funny way to end the day. They dismissed us at 4PM.

I really saw no major problems with this side of the justice system. Waiting in lines and sitting around were not fun activities, but it could have been worse (see the bureaucratic nightmare that is the MVA). I hope I get to serve on a jury in Baltimore city one day, but until that day comes I have definitely gained more confidence in the juror-related abilities of some of my fellow citizens.

Public transportation observations- Charm City Circulator and the Red Line

Posted by ameister on Friday, July 16th, 2010

Let’s talk about public transportation!

On Tuesday I had jury duty (more about that experience soon) at 8:15 AM at the Mitchell courthouse. I left my house in Reservoir Hill at 7:35 and walked down North Avenue to Penn Station. On the Saint Paul street side of Penn station I jumped on the Charm City Circulator which pulled up at about 7:57. At first it had about five people on it including two guys who looked like they were just riding it so they did not have to sit outside. There was one worker on the bus who appeared to be an observer. She talked to the driver a little bit. We were about to pull away when a few people ran toward the bus. Then more people ran toward the bus. A train had just arrived and quite a few of the people who were on the train knew about the circulator and got on it. The circulator is supposed to be for tourists, but this morning it was packed with savvy commuters. We pulled away at about 8:03. At Preston street we picked up more commuters. It was standing room only! We made it to the courthouse area at 8:14.

My commute back home was a little different. I arrived at the Fayette street stop at 4:09PM. A circulator bus approached soon after I arrived, but it had a “Not in Service” message on its front (even though it appeared filled with people) so it skipped the stop. 10 minutes later a circulator arrived. There were actually a few tourists on this bus. As we made our way up Charles street more people got on, but it was not as crowded as it was in the morning. Once again there were two guys in the back who were just trying to stay on the bus for as long as possible. Most people got off at Penn Station.

I was once told that the circulator would get white people more comfortable with riding the bus. It appears the circulator does have a broad appeal across races. I would say that 60% of the people on the bus were white, there were also quite a few Asians, and the rest (about 30%) were black. The bus was very clean and there was a TV on the ceiling that promoted tourist traps… I mean attractions.

The Charm City Circulator proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the proposed Charles Street Trolley is a total waste and a horrible idea. The Charm City Circulator does everything the Trolley would do. The Charm City Circulator is helping bring all sorts of people and vitality to the Charles Street corridor and is serving as a viable commuting option. It gets cars off the streets and it does not clog up Charles street. I highly recommend that you try out the circulator the next time you need to travel on the Charles/Saint Paul Street corridor.

In other public transportation news, I stumbled upon this Red Line article yesterday. Please take a moment to read why we must expand our current heavy rail line instead of wasting billions on a foolish light rail idea.

Pigtown beating and police reaction

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

It looks like there was a scary random act of violence in Pigtown. Below are two emails that describe the situation in Pigtown. I have also been told that “WVDA had a meeting scheduled with Major Bloodsworth on 7-6-10 at 6:30pm to discuss the activity on W.Ostend. Due to his abrupt transfer/retirement, we still have not meet face-to-face with a high ranking police officer.” Here is the first email:

“Here’s one e-mail sent to the Southern District Concerning the activity on W.Ostend:

Police cuff and cite City Council Candidate/Community Activist, criminals not pursued after brutally beating resident.

On 6-26-2010 at about 2:30am, Rick ****, of the 1300 block of W.Ostend St, returned home after enjoying the evening out with friends.  When he opened the front door, his dog ran out and around the corner.  Rick pursued the dog around the corner and quickly became surrounded by four drug dealers.  They jumped Rick (for no reason) breaking his nose and blackening both eyes.  Rick stumbled home constantly being pursued by one of the attackers. He entered his home called 911 and City Council Candidate/Community Activist, Adam Van Bavel.

Van Bavel arrived shortly after the Police to help his neighbor.  The Police cuffed The City Council Candidate, made him sit on the curb and left him there for some time.  Eventually, he was given a citation for “hindering” a Police Officer.  However, the Police never searched for, found or arrested the four young black males who jumped Rick.

Several hours later, Sebastian Sassi, (VP of WVDA) checked his voice mail and heard a message from Rick left immediately after the attack. Sassi went to Rick’s house and found the four attackers on the corner by Rick’s home.  Sassi called 911 and an officer responded.  However, the officer only questioned three of the four attackers—getting their names and their dates of births.  The four attackers were not taken into custody nor have warrants been issued for their arrest.”

Here is the second email:

I went to a friend who had called me for safety reasons after he had been assaulted two Saturday’s ago.  Upon arrival I was quickly confronted by one officer out of two.  He asked me to leave at which point I stated I was called by the victim and wanted to see how he was doing.  Rick, the victim was on the stairs, one officer was to his left and the confrontational officer to his right.  I was to the far right.  Rick interjected it was ok I be there, but the officer persisted that I leave and became physical by touching me.  I then removed him from my arms as I had done nothing to provoke this.  At that point he cuffed me, searched me and then went to his car for an extended period of time. The other officer neither agreed nor disagreed with the situation.  I remained quiet with the exception of asking for his badge number.  I wanted to file a complaint, but had scheduled a time to speak with Major Bloodsworth and others to discuss before doing so.  Obviously other issues came into play and that is no longer an option.  I deserve an apology and the court case should be dropped as enough of my time has been wasted.  What is paramount however is the way the situation played out.  We are in a time of extreme tension and community relations are key to maintaining safe communities.  These officers apparently didn’t give any efforts to search for the assailants despite them being known offenders in the area living just blocks away.  I sat in cuffs and took the brunt of the officer’s frustration and those responsible continue to roam free.  Last Monday I helped Rick move some items as he put his house for sale and two of the kids were glaring from the corner on the next block while we transferred items to his car.  That same day a man was stabbed on the opposing corner just hours, maybe even less than an hour before.  These kids are a problem in our community and for all I know it could have been one of them.  The Baltimore Police Department has a tough job and we all need to work together to ease tension and increase positive outcomes.  I simply want the best environment for our citizens and officers to work towards a better Baltimore.  This incident is not the way to get there and similar occurrences happen quite often.  I didn’t know Zach Sowers, but actively followed his story.  I have been attacked myself in Canton years ago and stabbed in the back having my right lung collapse in Ocean City.  Safety is a huge concern for me both personally and for the city I live in.  Please get back to me at your convenience to discuss further.

Sincerely,

Adam Van Bavel

Patricia Jessamy was on the Larry Young radio show on Friday

Posted by ameister on Monday, July 12th, 2010

Patricia Jessamy appeared on the Larry Young radio show on Friday morning on WOLB 1010AM. Jessamy is not known for appearing on TV/radio shows or for talking directly to the media so this appearance was newsworthy. In this election year I hope that every candidate in the State’s Attorney’s race will be open to media appearances and public debates.

I did not get to listen this morning and WOLB does not have an archived section, but the Baltimore Spectator did tweet about what he heard. Below are links to some of his tweets. Page Croyder was also listening and she made some observations about Jessamy’s policies regarding repeat violent offenders here.

Links to the Baltimore Spectator’s tweets:

http://twitter.com/BaltoSpectator/status/18117283520

http://twitter.com/BaltoSpectator/status/18117755424

Former Mayor Schmoke called in and endorsed Jessamy.

http://twitter.com/BaltoSpectator/status/18118983103

Warren Brown calls in and debates with Jessamy.

Caller says he will vote for Jessamy because Bernstein is a Jew.

“I’m the kind of State’s Attorney that doesn’t just sit in the background”

Follow the money and you will find out who controls Baltimore politics

Posted by ameister on Thursday, July 8th, 2010

The curious case of Scott Bloodsworth brings to light some interesting aspects of behind the scenes politics in Baltimore. Major Scott Bloodsworth was commander of the Southern Police District until a few days ago. His removal came as a shock to many residents. He is a popular figure and many felt he was doing a great job. There was a letter writing campaign that tried to get some answers.  Bloodsworth has now announced that he has retired.  At some point during the debacle that Bloodsworth was offered his original job back.

On Friday I was contacted by a resident of the Southern Police District who informed me of what was about to happen and the politics behind it. My source told me that Major Bloodsworth played a large role in facilitating the night tour City Council President Jack Young took of the Federal Hill bar district earlier this year. The Council President saw many wild out of control alcohol-fueled scenes that night. The bar owners were not given a warning so they had no time to clean things up and calm things down before Jack Young and the media got there. The bar owners expected a warning and that is wrong. They should be running their establishments properly at all times instead of just when an inspector or a leader comes by. They are not pleased with the prospect of higher fines for violations that Jack Young supports.

Many of the bar owners are associated with a certain Baltimore fundraising consultant. They give a lot of money to political clients of this fundraising consultant like Stephanie Rawlings-Blake and Martin O’Malley. My source told me that even though this fundraising consultant is not a registered lobbyist that she was able to use her influence at the highest levels of city government to get Major Scott Bloodsworth punished for his involvement in the Jack Young tour (which was a totally legal and appropriate tour). We have a situation where a fundraising consultant is now dictating public safety policy.

Those who donate lots of money to political campaigns in Baltimore own Baltimore. Those who control the flow of money to political campaigns are king makers.