Posts Tagged ‘Bureaucracy’

A Baltimore fire department employee lives in Garrett County and some random water bill information

Posted by ameister on Thursday, January 26th, 2012

According to this table a Baltimore fire department employee lives in Garrett County!  Does this person make the 348 mile round-trip commute every day? Pittsburgh is about 100 miles from Garrett County. I wonder why a  Garrett County resident wants to work in Baltimore? There has to be more to this story. 

The table also shows that six Allegany County residents work for Baltimore City, three Worcester County residents work for Baltimore City, and one Somerset County resident works for the Baltimore State’s Attorney’s office.

Some random water bill information for you:

My last city water bill included a page informing me of an “URBAN/SUBURBAN MYTH”- “Reality: The actual amount paid by customers in both jurisdictions is about the same, with Baltimore County paying slightly more under current rates”.

The city provides information about the “myth” here. The page that came along with my bill goes on to say:

“While each jurisdiction sets its own rates, City residents receive a quarterly bill for all water and sewer charges. County residents receive quarterly bills for water usage only AND are billed separately on their annual tax bill for additional water costs and all of their sewer fees. Baltimore City is then reimbursed by Baltimore County for all water and sewer costs owed”.

It is in Baltimore’s best interest to mail out its water bills quarterly. If a yearly bill was combined with Baltimore’s already super high property tax bill then many more residents would wake up and be outraged. A one time combined bill also is less likely to be paid in a timely fashion than one that is spaced out over four quarters.

Require that all city employees live in Baltimore and the number of families living in the city will increase by 10,000 in a decade

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, January 25th, 2012

Many people are talking about a Baltimore Deputy Mayor who lives outside of Baltimore. Quite a few people think it is offensive for a high ranking (and high paid) person in the mayor’s office to live outside of the city. A few people are shocked that this could happen. There is nothing illegal about this and none of you should be shocked, but I think there is something wrong with this picture.

There should be no shock about people in the mayor’s office (or any other city employee) living outside of Baltimore. Two weeks ago I posted about the numerous city employees who live outside of Baltimore and Maryland.  Yakov Shafranovich posted specific numbers at his blog:

  • 38.43% of Baltimore City’s 14,559 employees live outside of the city in Maryland.
  • 5.1% of Baltimore City employees live outside of Maryland.
  • The Mayor’s Office  has 111 employees and 30 of them live outside of Baltimore in Maryland and 16 of them live outside of Maryland.

Imagine if the 6,338 Baltimore employees who live outside of Baltimore were forced to live in Baltimore or quit their jobs.  The mayor wants to add 10,000 new families to Baltimore over the next decade. If the city told every city employee today that they have until the start of 2017 to move to Baltimore or they will have no job with the city then within five years Baltimore would be well on its way to attaining the 10,000 new families goal. Most of the city employees who quit because of this SHOULD NOT BE REPLACED in order to save money. Money that used to be spent on these employees can be allocated to improving services that will help retain and attract residents. In the perfect world this money would be used to lower property taxes.

A 100% city employee residency requirement will help shrink our bloated local government and help bring families to Baltimore. Two respectable accomplishments will be attained because of one policy change that is sure to make current city residents feel less frustrated. Instead of having a Woodlawn resident tell you that you deserve a fine because your grass is too high, you will now have to deal with a fellow city resident who will better understand the situation and empathize with you.  Jobs are not easy things to come by these days so if for some odd reason a large percentage (over 80%)  of current non-Baltimore residing city employees decide to quit then there will be plenty of people who want to live in Baltimore who will gladly fill the necessary jobs that were left empty.

Followups to two recent posts

Posted by ameister on Tuesday, January 10th, 2012

In my post entitled A coalition focused on moving Baltimore elections to 2014 I said that the Baltimore Election Change Coalition (BECC) needed to do a better marketing job. It turns out that they did send out a press release. A woman from the ACLU forwarded me the informative press release today and you can read it below. It looks like they are reading this blog.

A few people thought my idea to cut every single city employee’s pay by 10% was harsh.  Why should someone making $50,000 a year suddenly make $45,000 a year. In reality if the city was run efficiently and our politicians were not in bed with the unions such a drastic move would not have to be made. Instead of having three people doing the work of one we would only have one person doing the work of one person. Pension/insurance reform should have happened a long time ago.  We did not take our medicine ten years ago so now it is going to hurt much more than it would have then. Even though this all seems harsh, it is better than what is happening in the private sector.  Some people with manufacturing jobs were fired and were out of work for long periods of time. After months to years of no job these people were hired at similar jobs for 75% or less of their former pay. They gladly took these jobs.

I strongly feel that the middle to upper managers in the city bureaucracy who have gamed the system and now earn over $80,000 a year should feel the pain (fired or major salary cut) before the custodian who actually works hard and does his low paying job efficiently.

I will leave you with this reader comment from a Washington Post article about the proposed Metro fare hike:

“Where’s the 5% drop in crazy pension entitlements then?
Seriously, publicize your P&L and let the taxpayers decide if you are running a transportation company or a customer-funded retirement scheme. FYI, there IS a problem when over one-third+++ of your costs are retiree entitlements!


MEDIA ADVISORY

New Baltimore Coalition to Hold Press Conference Calling for Moving City Elections to Match Gubernatorial Cycle

ADVISORY FOR                                  CONTACT:

January 9, 2012                                 Millie Tyssowski, LWV, milliety@earthlink.net410-448-2650

BALTIMORE, MD – On Monday, January 9, a newly-formed group, the Baltimore Election Change Coalition (BECC), will hold a press conference to build support and discuss its goal of changing the year of city elections to coincide with the gubernatorial cycle. Members of the coalition include the League of Women Voters of Baltimore City, American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland, Baltimore City Branch of the NAACP, Citizens Planning and Housing Association, National Action Network of Greater Baltimore, Baltimore’s Safe and Sound Campaign, and Teaching Our Own Understanding and Responsibility.
In 2011, voter participation in the Baltimore City primary and general elections was at an all time low. Less than 12% of eligible voters participated in the primary; only 22% of registered voters voted. General election turnout was even worse. The BECC believes that having our City officials selected by so few voters with the expenditure of monies that the City needs in the current budget crisis calls for action now.
The BECC proposes that Baltimore City join all other major jurisdictions in the State and hold its elections at the same time as the gubernatorial election – beginning with the gubernatorial election of 2014. With more officials and issues on the ballot, more voters will turn out and democracy in Baltimore City will be strengthened. In addition, the City could potentially save several million dollars.
WHAT: Press conference to announce the Baltimore Election Change Coalition and discuss the benefits of changing the year of city elections to coincide with the gubernatorial cycle.
WHO: Representatives of the Coalition and Maryland General Assembly Legislators
WHEN: Monday, January 9, 2012 at 10 AM
WHERE: 417 E. Fayette St., Baltimore, MD

###

Baltimore’s $52 million deficit: My ideas, the online tool to fix it, and the take-home cars that help fuel it

Posted by ameister on Monday, January 9th, 2012

Baltimore is going to have to find a way to fix its $52 million deficit. The city has created an interesting web page where you can decide what to cut or tax in order to fix the deficit. Check out the site here and play around with the deficit cutter tool.

It was pretty easy for me to cut the deficit  with the limited options the city provided. The bottom line is that the city payroll made up of current and former employees (pensions and insurance costs) is too high.  In most businesses you try to cut payroll and run things more efficiently when you are losing money. Baltimore city is not run efficiently. There are 14,559 city workers- one worker for every 43 residents!  Yakov Shafranovich just posted two incredible blog entries that pertain to this subject.

At this link Yakov shows how many city workers live outside of the city and the state and which departments house the most out of city and state workers.

At this link Yakov discusses the illegal tax breaks, pensions, and take-home cars that helped plunge this city into the massive deficit it finds itself in. I feel that no city employee should have a take-home car (in 2009 at least 247 city employees had take-home vehicles) and if any elected official is receiving an illegal tax break that he or she should resign and return all the money he or she owes to the city.  The sweet deal that city retirees currently get in terms of pensions and insurance needs to be more in line with the real world. Every single city employee should take a 10% pay cut and if they think that is wrong then they can try and get a job in the private sector in this economy.

We all see the city employees who do nothing or next to nothing all day and still have attitudes.  This culture of complacency and inefficiency needs to change now.  The tax payers of Baltimore are funding this disgrace and the only way things are going to change is if the money stops flowing and city workers are actually forced to earn their incomes like people do in the private sector.

Why does a useless bureaucrat get to have a take-home Jeep Cherokee?

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, January 4th, 2012

A shocking example of local government waste was briefly mentioned in today’s Baltimore Sun article about the HABC’s recent troubles:

“Those tagged range from a Bobcat to a 2011 Ford F-550 truck to the 2007 take-home Jeep Cherokee used by the unit’s chief, Claude “Buzz” Wolfe.”

Why does an HABC employee get to have a take-home vehicle? The agency is supposed to house people, not give cars out to “unit chiefs”. How many more “take-home vehicles” lurk in Baltimore’s bloated bureaucracy?

Baltimore’s property tax revenue will decline just like I predicted last year

Posted by ameister on Tuesday, December 27th, 2011

This all could have been avoided!

From yesterday’s Washington Post:

“For instance, Baltimore collected $815 million in property taxes during the most recent fiscal year, according to Bill Voorhees, Baltimore’s director of revenue and tax analysis. Next year, the figure is predicted to shrink to $803.5 million. The following year, $773 million. The year after that, $735.7 million. The year after that, $729.4 million.”

On December 24, 2010 I predicted this scenario in this blog and I pointed out that this all could have been avoided if our leaders understood simple mathematics. Had our leaders practiced fiscal restraint during this past half decade and allowed the constant yield property tax rate to be our property rate then the budget would have never grown to its current size. Our leaders chose to increase Baltimore’s budget every year and now if they do not raise property tax rates it will be impossible to maintain it. Had we cut programs and salaries in 2007 or 2008 it would have been a lot less painful than what we are about to experience. Our leaders decided to keep kicking the can down the road and hope for a miracle.  If they truly understood the numbers they would have known that eventually the game would end and cuts would be unavoidable. If any elected official proposes higher property taxes because of this “unexpected” budget shortfall then they are not fit to hold elected office.  This economic scenario was very predictable.

The time has come to reign in spending and to get rid of all of the city government patronage jobs!

Baltimore allows bureaucracy to get in the way of innovation and intelligence

Posted by ameister on Thursday, December 8th, 2011

Take some time to read this blog post about Baltimore’s tech community.

Over the years I have attended numerous tech events and meetings in Baltimore. The ideas and energy at these events are inspirational.  These people and ideas are mostly ignored by the establishment bureaucracy of Baltimore. The minute these young idealists encounter the monster Baltimore bureaucracy they begin to realize the unfortunate truth about Baltimore. If you are a smart person with a great idea and you quietly choose not to play by the bureaucratic rules of this city then there is no way your idea will ever be adopted by the government.  If you choose to jump through all the bureaucratic hoops, participate in all the time wasting  formalities, and play the archaic bureaucratic game then most likely your idea will still be rejected and you will be bitter and want nothing to do with this city.

Leaders talk about bringing people to Baltimore, but their slow bureaucratic actions and inability to adopt efficient mechanisms for change drive away countless great idealists who would rather take their talents to places where they will be welcomed instead of bogged down at every point in the game.

What laws are enforced in Baltimore?

Posted by ameister on Sunday, November 20th, 2011

The people down at Occupy Baltimore are revealing a very weak spot in the Baltimore City bureaucracy that many of us are already too familiar with. Occupy Baltimore is clearly breaking the law by setting up an overnight campsite in the middle of the tourist attraction known as the Inner Harbor. This is an act of civil disobedience that is supposed to focus people’s attention on economic injustices. Since there is a reason behind this there is not the kind of outrage amongst the general public as there would be if drug dealers set up an open air drug market on a random previously drug-free block in Baltimore. Occupy Baltimore is an “acceptable” example of the bureaucracy’s inability to timely enforce its own rules. The growing crackdown momentum from outside of Baltimore will easily allow the city to (very soon) get rid of the tents and sleep overs.

Those of us who are unlucky enough to have open air drug markets on our block or on numerous nearby blocks are very familiar with the city’s inability to enforce its own laws on a regular basis. Open air drug markets are the ultimate slap in the face to productive social behavior.   Open air drug markets are signs of lawlessness and anarchy. They make it clear that this block is not under the same laws that Baltimore is supposed to be under. The police make all sorts of excuses about why they can not take care of the obvious problem. One of them is that there are not enough police in cars in the district. We all know there are tons of police in Baltimore, but many are behind desks or in internal affairs or physically unable to preform their job. The kind of cop that society is so familiar with (beat cop in the car or on the street) seems to be the least common in Baltimore. The bad guys know this, they know the odds are in their favor so they continue to conduct their anti-social dealings in front of children, seniors, and anyone else who may be unlucky enough to look out their window in the middle of the day.

In my neighborhood of Reservoir Hill you are more likely to get fined for somebody else’s trash in your backyard, or a chair on your front porch, or lack of a permit for that piece of  sheet rock you had to replace than you are to see a police car stop to deal with an open air drug market.

Baltimore has enough money to fund the housing inspectors, meter maids, and all the other tools with attitudes that harass and fine law abiding productive citizens and landlords, but they can’t get the obvious drug dealers off the streets.

What would happen if the home owners and landlords took an Occupy Baltimore stand and refused to pay the harassing fines they received? Does the city have enough manpower to make everyone play by the so-called rules if most people started to ignore them?

In these tough economic times I hope the city tells its inspectors to take it easy with the homeowner occupants in the neighborhoods filled with drug related lawlessness. It really is insulting to receive a useless fine when your block is haunted by open air drug markets and all the anti-social behavior that goes hand in hand with it.  Fines for nothing, permits for everything, all sorts of punishing taxes, and uncontrollable anti-social behavioral are major reasons people leave Baltimore, do not want to live in Baltimore, and do not want to do business in Baltimore.  The bureaucracy needs to prioritize soon before it loses complete control and drives even more productive people away.

A reader talks about her problems with the Baltimore Environmental Control Board

Posted by ameister on Friday, October 14th, 2011

In February I wrote about the Baltimore Environmental Control Board. The other day a reader left an interesting comment under that post. I have posted the reader’s comment below:

“Hi,
I am currently trying to get the Environmental Control board to listen to me. I was cited 5 times on the same day for trash and garbage outside my investment property. 4 of the citations were the same and written on the same day for garbage not in a trash can. Then 1 citation was for garbage in front of the house. In my opinion they have no right to issue duplicate citations on the same day for the same thing. This was $250 and is now $750 while they continue to deny me a hearing, due process.

I did not pay them because I requested a hearing date. I did not receive the original citations but received a letter in the mail informing me of them and my non-responsibility in the matter. By the time a was informed of the tickets and requested a hearing it was past the time and I have been denied a hearing 3 times by them for this issue. I refuse to pay for 4 different citations for the same offense on the same date. There is something wrong with this. It is like getting 4 parking tickets on the same day for the same thing in the same spot. The citations were written June 15, 2011, I received the letter from them after the due date and I decided to tell the tenants, hold their money and go to a hearing which I am being denied. I have the letters. They do not hear what I am saying and I am being taken advantage of.

What can I do? I am thinking of petitioning the Court of Baltimore for Judicial review.”

Baltimore goals to strive for

Posted by ameister on Sunday, October 2nd, 2011

With so much activism talk in the air these days I thought now would be a great time to share part of an email I received a year ago. This person wanted to start an organization built around the following very worthy reforms:
(1) Performance-based pay for teachers.
(2) Against all new bonding proposals until the city balances its budget.
(3) Reform of civil service rules for city workers to make them easier to fire.
(4) Cutting pensions down to sustainable levels comparable to the private sector.
(5) No funding of campaigns by developers with business before the city.

I like all of these ideas. Over the years I have dealt with many organizations with good ideas that lack focus. I wish these organizations would have grabbed on to concrete goals like these ones instead of abstract unattainable concepts. Change starts at the local level.

If a group could get any of the above goals accomplished then it could spiral into something much larger that could take down many negative aspects of the local Baltimore establishment. I hope BaltimoreHourly.com will help inform people about such topics so they can properly organize themselves into a force for real change in Baltimore.