Posts Tagged ‘Developers’

State Center development project questioned in an open letter

Posted by ameister on Monday, November 1st, 2010

Here is a link to an open letter from Ronald Kreitner to Michael Gaines.

The letter addresses Gaines’ recent comments to the Baltimore Sun regarding plans for the State Center development project north of Mount Vernon. Gaines is the assistant secretary in the state Department of General Services.

Kreitner (The Executive Director of the WestSide Renaissance) represents an emerging group of landlords and brokers from Baltimore’s downtown community.

The letter is signed by Ronald Kreitner, T. Courtenay Jenkins III (of Cushman & Wakefield), and Calman Zamoiski, Jr.

Video of an illegal dirt bike in Pigtown. Will the bureaucrats do as they say?

Posted by ameister on Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

I have written about the illegal dirt bike problem in Baltimore on quite a few occasions in the past.  Thanks to the WVDA we now have the opportunity to study a real life illegal dirt bike story before it has been concluded. The video that acompanies this story shows an illegal dirt bike being stored in a backyard. Leaders from numerous agencies and branches of government have said that if residents report an illegal dirt bike in the state that this one is in,then the problem will be addressed. We have the opportunity to see if this is all talk that is only intended to calm down a frustrated city or if it is a real promise.
YouTube Preview Image

A different take on the State Center project

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010

I read this State Center related article about two months ago, and soon after that I received the following email update on the State Center project.

Now that time has passed and I have had time to think about the project I have started to wonder about the new office buildings aspect of the project. I understand that in order to connect Bolton Hill and Mount Vernon the parking lots and office buildings have to go and that the office buildings are outdated, ugly, and possibly filled with mold and other environmental hazards. Without the office buildings the state workers will not have a place to work. The state says that new office buildings should be built on the site. My question is why should new office space be built when in downtown Baltimore there is a large amount of class A office space just sitting around empty? This class A office space is available at cheaper rates than the proposed new office space at State Center will be rented out for.  Almost a quarter of Downtown Baltimore’s premium office space sits empty! Why should the state be involved with a new office building project in such an environment?

“Attached is an update on the State Center redevelopment project prepared by the State Center Neighborhood Alliance.  We hope it is useful to you. The Alliance is an organization of 18 neighborhood associations and stakeholder institutions.  Information about it is included in the attached update. Feel free to share this information. If you have received this email in error or do not wish to receive further emails on this topic, please let us know at scneighborhoodalliance@gmail.com.” ATTACHMENT:

UPDATE ON STATE CENTER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT – as of 7/30/10

Prepared by the State Center Neighborhood Alliance

The State Center redevelopment has cleared some major hurdles at the State administrative level and is moving forward quickly to meet an expected construction start date of November 2010.  The public/private partnership involves the State of Maryland and State Center LLC, a consortium of private entities headed by Ekistics LLC.  The overall goal is to redevelop a 28-acre site, currently occupied by large surface parking lots and Maryland State administrative buildings, into a lively, 24/7 transit-oriented development including 1,500,000 sf. of State offices, 583,000 sf. of private office space, 1,500 residential units, 264,000 sf. of retail, along with other amenities.

The State Center redevelopment team has taken the past few months to identify new minority development partners and new business terms.  These have been approved by Maryland’s State Center Executive Committee which is composed of five state cabinet secretaries, four members of the General Assembly, a representative of the Stadium Authority, and a representative of Baltimore City.

On July 28, 2010, a major hurdle was cleared. The new partners and new business terms were presented to the Maryland Board of Public Works, and the Board approved Lease agreements and the underground parking garage.  This approval triggers the development team’s final design process for Phase 1 of 5 phases.  Phase 1 includes parcel G (the parking lot at Eutaw and MLK) which is being planned for offices for the Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, an underground garage, some retail including a grocery, and some housing units AND parcel I-2 (a triangular-shaped plaza at Preston and Howard) which is being planned for offices for the Maryland Department of Planning and for the Maryland Transit Administration and some retail.

In parallel, Federal seed-money is initiating some of the traffic and street modifications recommended in the Traffic Impact Study from 2008 – specifically the modification of the intersection at Howard Street and Martin Luther King Boulevard.  A key modification that is among those seeming to move forward is to close the small piece of Howard immediately behind the Rite-Aid in order to improve the failing intersection at Howard and MLK.  There is some concern as to what this will do to traffic on Read and Chase.

Other concerns expressed so far involve getting the development team to address the traffic and street issues on all project edges at the same time in order to mitigate unintended consequences.  A Traffic Mitigation Agreement between the City and the development team is one of the next steps after the approvals at the Maryland Board of Public Works.  The Neighborhood Alliance is working on scheduling a promised work session with the development team and City traffic staff before the mitigation agreement is finalized.

The State Center Neighborhood Alliance, a confederation of 18 voting and non-voting members has been established to provide communication between the State Center development team and the surrounding neighborhoods.  The member organizations and institutions each have one representative and one alternate as designated by the member organization or institution.  The Alliance’s interim co-chairs are James Hamlin of the Pennsylvania Avenue Redevelopment Collaboration (PARC) and John Kyle of the Mount Royal Improvement Association (MRIA).  Neighborhood residents and representatives of stakeholder organizations and institutions are welcome to participate in Alliance committees.

The currently active committees are Traffic, Design, Human Capital and Commercial Synergy. Each of these committees has been meeting with the development team to discuss Alliance issues relevant to the project and their impact on the surrounding neighborhoods and institutions.  A Finance committee is still in a formative stage.

Page 2 of 2 – 7/30/10 State Center Update from State Center Neighborhood Alliance

Current work of the Alliance committees (not necessarily the full range of activity and goals):

The Human Capital committee is currently focused on creating mechanisms to communicate future job opportunities and to develop joint jobs/skills training programs.

The Traffic committee has been focusing on the currently failing intersections along Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and looking at the overall plans on all edges to improve the connections to our surrounding neighborhoods and ensure that unintended increased traffic does not adversely impact our communities.

The Design committee is working with the development team on reviewing the design of the buildings and site looking at issues such as scale, approach, materials, design elements and timing to ensure that this project is effectively knitted to its existing neighbors.

The Commercial Synergy committee is focused on sharing marketing and business recruitment information so that existing retail corridors and the new retail to be established can be complementary in terms of both services provided and sharing leads which may better match each other’s areas.

– The Finance committee will eventually focus on the financial structure of the public support and preferably work on identifying potential revenue streams to support the efforts of the Alliance.

Details regarding the project can be found online at the State Center development team’s web site, www.statecenter.org .

Contact your participating organization or institution to learn more

and/or to participate in Alliance committee meetings.


STATE CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE – BACKGROUND INFORMATION (as of 11/24/09)


The State Center Neighborhood Alliance (“Alliance”) is comprised of neighborhood organizations, anchor institutions, faith-based entities, and community-serving organizations directly affected by the State Center development project. The Alliance is committed to support a State Center project that enhances and supports the surrounding communities but desires to work with the Developer, the State and the City to define/refine the project to ensure that it is designed and implemented in such a manner to allow that continued support.  The Alliance Interim Co-Chairs are James Hamlin of Pennsylvania Avenue Redevelopment Collaboration (PARC) and John Kyle of Mt. Royal Improvement Association (MRIA).

The purpose of the Alliance is to:

  • provide the community voice to the development project occurring at State Center,
  • leverage benefits for residents in the impact zone, and
  • keep the Alliance and the greater community informed of the process.

The current participating organizations are:

1.      Antique Row Business Association

2.      Baltimore Symphony Orchestra

3.      Charles-North Community Association

4.      Druid Heights Community Development Corporation

5.      Heritage Crossing Residents Association

6.      McCulloh Homes Resident Council

7.      Madison Park Improvement Association

8.      Maryland General Hospital

9.      Maryland Institute College of Art

10.  Midtown Development Corporation

11.  Mount Royal Improvement Association

12.  Mount Vernon/Belvedere Association

13.  Pennsylvania Avenue Redevelopment Collaboration, Inc. (PARC)

14.  Seton Hill Association

15.  Terraces at the Towns Residents Association

16.  United Baptist Missionary Convention & Auxiliaries, Inc.

17.  University of Baltimore

18.  Upton Planning Committee, Inc.

Areas of Particular Interest:

1.      Commercial Synergy – Ensuring the retail strategy executed will ultimately improve the overall strength and retail mix of both State Center and the surrounding neighborhoods

2.      Traffic – Ensuring that both interim and final traffic patterns and transportation strategies are developed with community perspectives on traffic impact and physical changes to street, intersection, and sidewalk design with the goal of achieving positive pedestrian, traffic, and parking impacts on the affected communities.

3.      Design Oversight – Participating in the review of building, public space and streetscape design (e.g., articulation, style, scale, lighting, signage) in relation to (a) the site itself and the surrounding neighborhoods; (b) technical compliance with the PUD; (c) the “green” aspects of the project; and (d) the phasing/timing of the project

4.      Finance – Monitors the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and land lease.

5.      Human Capital – Ensuring that community residents will be ready and available for employment, entrepreneurship, homeownership, and other Human Capital opportunities that are associated with the State Center Project by providing input, guidance, strategies, and communication mechanisms.

My feelings about the Walmart at 25th Street Station being one step closer to reality

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

It appears that the 25th Street Station development (mostly known for the Walmart and Lowes it will bring to the heart of Baltimore) will become a reality. The city planning commission voted in favor of the development. Be sure to check out this great article from the Baltimore Sun that gives a great description of how life really is on the business and residential side of things in Remington.

I am not a big fan of Walmart, but I support the project if they make sure it is not architecturally offensive and if a reasonable new traffic pattern can be established. One must remember that this is not just about a new Walmart, there will be new residential units also and they need to make sure that they fit in with the surrounding area and that no new “dead blocks” are created with windowless backs of projects fronting main streets. I am also vehemently opposed to any store in this development being forced by the government to pay a living wage to its employees. Let the free market set the salary.

I feel that it would be in the best interest of the two major tenants (Walmart and Lowes) and the developer to contribute money to some security agency (Johns Hopkins police or maybe the Baltimore police) in order to increase patrols in the Remington area. It will make the area safer and guarantee a more pleasant experience in and around the 25th Street Station complex.

I fear that many of the so-called “Hipsters” in the area are living in a fantasy world of sorts when it comes to Remington. There currently are major urban problems in Remington (that an empty car lot would not improve) that some younger people seem to be oblivious of. This is a recipe for a major crime event in the near future. I hope this does not happen but it jumped into my mind after reading this Baltimore Sun article.

There are some people who love to jump on the bandwagon and block anything that deals with “evil corporations”. Some of them have good intentions, but some of them are unable to or refuse to understand the realities on the ground. One reality that I have not heard talked about is the fact that just south of the proposed development another large industrial plot of land is about to go to auction. Things are clearly changing in the area, but the future is not set in stone. Those who are so opposed to the Walmart could get together and buy up this industrial piece of land and create their own inner-city business utopia of independently owned non-profit widget stores that pay “living wage” salaries. They could also just sit there and complain. It’s a free country, it’s a private transaction, and that’s life.

Artists need to learn to be proactive buyers and not reactionary complainers

Posted by ameister on Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

The Baltimore Brew published a thought provoking article about an industrial building in Hampden that has been purchased by a developer. The building has been occupied by artists for a decade. I remember going to a party there in 2001 or 2002. The developer who plans to update the building for mixed use purposes is named David Tufaro. Tufaro is actually a real businessman and not some scam artist like most “developers” in Baltimore.

The artists and some community members are not pleased that Tufaro is about to modernize the building and displace the renting artists. Tufaro is legally buying the building, something the artists should have considered over the past decade. It is unfortunate when a renter has to leave because of a new owner, but it is also sad that so many artists do not see the opportunity that ownership provides. If you think you have found the next “underground” living space in Baltimore then I highly recommend that instead of paying the current owner rent, that you make him a a purchase offer so such future “unfortunate situations” can be avoided and so that you can totally dictate the socioeconomic makeup of your neighborhood,

Affordable housing in Reservoir Hill thanks to the Recovery Act

Posted by ameister on Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Remember to check out the Charm City Current message board.


I usually am not a fan of anything pertaining to the federal “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009″. I am not a fan of any large federal government program because there is always corruption and insiders making huge profits off of the taxpayer. If the banks would have not been bailed out then they would have been forced to liquidate their assets and the housing market would have flooded. Prices would have dropped to record lows across the country and more people would be able to afford to be home owners. This did not happen and we have to deal with the reality on the ground.

The Federal Government created something called the “Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2” (NSP2).  The NSP2 program is going to provide money to help potential homeowners purchase homes (I believe most of them will be foreclosures or bank owned) in Reservoir Hill where I live. I do not know all the specifics (and the specifics really do not matter in this context), but Healthy Neighborhoods Inc. will be managing the funds that are designated for Reservoir Hill. This is a program that will be mostly consumer driven. Instead of a developer saying that he is going to fix up ten houses and then sell them, this program will allow potential homeowners to come to Healthy Neighborhoods and tell them that they are interested in a specific house.   The purchaser will not have to worry about a developer’s profit margin or tastes. If you have ever thought about moving to Reservoir Hill then you should seriously consider this incredibly unique opportunity. The houses are large and cheap, and the government is providing a substantial subsidy! Please contact the Reservoir Hill Neighborhood Association at reshill@reshill.net if you have any interest.

This story obviously hits very close to home for me. I can guarantee you that if you want to be an ‘Urban Homesteader” in Reservoir Hill that I will give you the necessary emotional support and advice whenever you need it. There is an entire network of people in this neighborhood who will eagerly support any new home owner occupant who is up for the Reservoir Hill Challenge. The amount of neighborhood stability that a new home owner occupant contributes by moving here and replacing an empty house is immeasurable.

Back in 2001 when I came up with the “Buy a Block” concept there were many people who could not grasp the idea of getting rid of the developer middleman and focusing on the individual home buyer. I stayed true to my beliefs and encouraged individuals to buy houses on the 2200 block of Linden. I knew that getting individual home owners into houses was much more efficient and helpful than getting developers’ hands on empty houses and leaving it up to them when and how much to sell the houses for. My block has substantially improved on many different levels since 2003 when I first moved in. On the 2200 and 2300 blocks of nearby Callow Avenue where a politically connected “developer” was awarded houses, the great majority of those houses are still empty and little has changed for the positive because of the use of the traditional development model. I have been told that if you want to start your own “buy a block” project in Reservoir Hill that all you have to do is gather up potential home owners, get them in touch with Healthy Neighborhoods, and select the houses and you too can end up with like-minded new individuals in an urban homesteading environment. You might even end up buying some of those houses that the “developer” controls on Callow!

The federal government is funding a project that allows individuals to replicate the idea behind my buy-a-block project. I definitely feel a sense of vindication. It’s unfortunate that the Baltimore power structure had to learn the hard way and did not adopt more creative urban rejuvenation models a few years ago.

Senator Theatre news

Posted by ameister on Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

The future of the Senator Theatre is a subject that conjures up all sorts of emotions in people living in the Baltimore area. Below are links to two letters about the future of the Senator from respected authorities. Instead of adding my own commentary on this emotional topic I will let the letters speak for themselves:

Karen Noonan, the President of the Theatre Historical Association of America wrote this letter to the Mayor regarding the BDC and the Senator RFP process.

Baltimore Heritage agrees with Ms. Noonan in this letter to the Mayor.

The Senator Theatre saga continues

Posted by ameister on Thursday, March 4th, 2010

On February 19, 2010, 446 Rosebank Avenue next to the Senator Theatre went up for auction. Laura Perkins (a fan and neighbor of the Senator) won the auction with a bid of $106800. This could complicate the Senator RFP.  Below is an email from Ms. Perkins where she explains why she bought the house and her take on the RFP situation:


February 23, 2010

To whom it may concern,

On Friday, February 19th, I purchased the home and property located at 446 Rosebank Ave. at a foreclosure auction, which had been widely publicized within our community and beyond. The auction sale triggered speculation regarding my motives and my plans for the property, which is contiguous with The Senator Theatre property in the rear of the site.

I am one of the core volunteers with the Friends of The Senator Theatre group, and I share the group’s rising concerns over the flawed Senator RFP process that the Baltimore Development Corporation is conducting. I was also the sole Friends of The Senator representative on the BDC’s RFP advisory panel.

Despite serious past concerns over the manner in which Baltimore City acquired ownership of The Senator, I resolved to approach with optimism the city’s RFP evaluation process and I extended the BDC leadership the benefit of the doubt. I hoped for a thorough process that would give unbiased objective evaluation to the proposals. I quickly became alarmed, however, over the inappropriate secrecy of the RFP process and the BDC’s repeated flat refusals to allow bona fide historic theatre redevelopment and film industry professionals to consult with the RFP panel. From my perspective, the BDC’s insular and uninformed stance puts both The Senator’s future and over a million dollars in scarce city taxpayer funds at great risk.

It’s a scandalous situation, and in response, I pointedly resigned in protest from the RFP panel. My resignation came shortly after the BDC leaders stated that the 446 Rosebank Ave property, which Tom Kiefaber acquired 15 years ago because he believes it is critical to The Senator’s future, has no real significance to the two Senator RFPs under consideration. As a Senator RFP panel member, I knew this was false information.

That inaccurate assertion, like many previous BDC pronouncements, was clearly intended to mislead the citizens of Baltimore by using the media and our city council representatives to spread disinformation. Combined with the BDC’s refusal to consult with qualified experts in evaluating the RFPs, it was the last straw.

I’ve now personally inhabited a back room at the BDC and experienced first hand how this quasi-public agency effectively fosters incorrect beliefs among a jaded public, by trading in false and misleading information. A recent Pew Center for Excellence in Journalism study of key news stories in Baltimore, including the auction of The Senator Theatre, noted that the downsizing Baltimore media rarely fulfills its fourth estate mandate to verify the accuracy of the government’s statements.

I am relatively new here in Baltimore, and I still cling to our nation’s diminishing democratic ideals, the constitution, and the private property rights of each and every citizen. I blog as “Astrogirl,” and I spent much of the past year investigating how a few powerful individuals in city government and at the BDC have repeatedly abused Tom Kiefaber and violated his civil rights, while misrepresenting the situation to the media in ways intended to defame and undermine his professional reputation. The inaccuracy of the BDC’s past attacks on Mr. Kiefaber was shockingly easy to discover, and it chilled me to the bone to learn how Baltimore’s embedded culture of corruption and manipulation operates with seeming impunity.

The research has opened my eyes, and once I saw Baltimore’s “shadow government” in action, it was apparent that enough is enough. Someone from our community other than Tom Kiefaber has to step up, as he has done over the years despite threats of retribution, and take an overt, public stand against the abuse of governmental power in Baltimore City by the BDC and the city government. Where I come from, local government and their related institutions don’t assume they can indulge in this level of corrupt manipulation, because the citizens will ultimately stand up to be counted and do something about it.

I acted on my convictions last Friday and bought the 446 Rosebank Ave. property at auction, as the only private bidder. A BDC representative was present to observe the auction of the property they deemed inconsequential. As the successful bidder, I plan to assert my rights as the adjacent residential property owner to The Senator and occupy a legitimate seat at the table as the Senator RFP situation unfolds.

I stepped up for good reason, because The Senator’s passionate past protector and steward has been neutralized and sidelined, and the theatre’s future is at stake and endangered by the politically tainted Senator RFP selection process.

I do not agree in the slightest with the BDC’s public and private assertion that 446 Rosebank Ave. is inconsequential to the RFP process, and the pointed inquiries I’ve received in the past few days validate my firm belief that Mr. Kiefaber was right all along. The 446 property is logistically, geographically, and strategically linked to The Senator Theatre and its future. That will undoubtedly become more apparent to all as things evolve.

Increasing my vested ownership stake in the community at this time should indicate that I am determined to help ensure that the future of The Senator Theatre will ultimately be decided through an open and transparent historic theatre redevelopment process, and not the shrouded RFP sham currently being perpetrated by the Baltimore Development Corporation.

Sincerely,

Laura Perkins

Purchaser of 446 Rosebank Ave.

No new publicly funded sports complexes!

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

I was sent this site by a friend of mine. It is a report from early in the 2000′s that details what a waste of money most of Baltimore’s publicly funded projects are. It shows that building a new arena or soccer stadium would be a bad investment for the tax payers of Baltimore or Maryland.

The proposed soccer stadium is in the news again. You better believe that developer and major political contributor Patrick Turner is excited about the possibility of a soccer stadium down there.

Mayor Sheila Dixon wants to build a soccer stadium in Baltimore in order to get the DC United soccer team to move here. She thinks it will compliment the new developments that are supposed to spring up around Westport and the Camden Yards Stadium area.  If this is such a great investment then one of the many so-called developers who contributes to Dixon’s campaign should fund the stadium himself.   As two of my past videos show, there are many areas around Baltimore (including RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE MAYOR’S CHURCH) that could use a fraction of the $200million that would be used on a soccer stadium.

A soccer stadium is not going to solve Baltimore’s urban ills. A story about a proposed soccer stadium will definitely distract the public from what is really going on in City Hall though. Nice try.

By the way, In San Francisco the Baseball Stadium was PRIVATELY FUNDED:

“The ballpark is the first privately funded ballpark built for Major League Baseball since Dodger Stadium opened in 1962. No new taxes and no money from San Francisco’s general fund were used to build the ballpark. The Giants lease the land on which the ballpark sits from the Port of San Francisco at a fair market value.”

There has also been talk about  Baltimore needing a brand new full size arena so we we can have a shot at acquiring an NBA team.  Tax payers can not afford to pay for a new arena for an NBA team that we will never get.  If by some miracle (actually it would be a curse)  we did get a team the people of Baltimore would not support it.  This may be a city that that produces NBA talent but it is a region that does not give a darn about the NBA (and rightfully so).

If the counties around Baltimore would like to pay for a new arena and new infrastructure for Baltimore City then go ahead and waste YOUR money.  If some Billionaire would like to do the same thing then be my guest.  Baltimore city needs to focus on lowering property taxes immediately if we ever wish to even get close to returning to our former glory.  We need to take drastic actions in order to lower the property taxes but our leaders lie and say there is no fat to cut out of the bloated and wasteful city budget.  Wasting money on an arena will only hurt us long term.

Some people think that you need an NBA, NFL, or baseball team to be a “real city”.  Well Oklahoma City just took Seattle’s old NBA team.  Where would you rather live?  Which city is the “real city”?

We are not getting another major league professional team! We will just end up like Kansas City with a brand new arena and a few more events a year. Do you really want to be the next Kansas City or do you want to be Seattle where they stand up to the corporate bully otherwise known as the NBA?

Right now our arena is profitable and it is a positive economic contributor to Baltimore.  At the end of the day after you consider the following factors will Baltimore and Maryland end up in a better economic situation once the new arena or soccer stadium is built?

  • To build a new arena the old one must be shut down for two years. No revenue will be generated, no taxes will be collected, no people will come to an event and spend at surrounding businesses, no parking garages will be filled…
  • The new arena will cost close to $400 million.  Where will the money come from?
  • How quickly will the arena be able to generate a +$400 million impact for the state of Maryland?
  • Will we end up with a 6.5% sales tax to fund a new arena or soccer stadium?
  • Once the new arena is fully operational will it be as profitable as the old one?
  • Once the new arena is fully operational will it really attract new events that the old one could not? How profitable will these events be and how much money will they bring in for the local economy?

It appears to me that publicly funded projects in Baltimore only get proposed in order to pay a friend or political contributor back.  When policy is controlled by developers and those with little interest in the well being of the residents of Baltimore then we have a major systemic problem.  Baltimore needs to come up with projects and policies that actually help the citizens of Baltimore!  It’s a very simple concept that has been completely lost in this city.  I have said it before and I will say it again: We need a new system!

More Harlem Park videos

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Have a safe New Year’s Eve. Remember that December 31st is not a city holiday so meter maids will be ticketing the uninformed.  I hope this coming decade is one of true change and rebirth for Baltimore.

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image