Posts Tagged ‘Jack Young’

Will a mayoral candidate drop out and run for council president?

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, June 29th, 2011

The Mayor made her official campaign announcement in front of her childhood home (while other mayoral candidates prepared for a debate that hardly anyone knew about) on Monday.  She is a mayor without any major controversy and with many connections that could lead her to higher positions in the future. Despite the mayor’s solid political standing she has at least four major challengers who currently say they want the position she currently holds. The experts are not giving these challengers much of a chance.

Jack Young is the current President of the City Council. He is a horrible public speaker and he was caught up in a Jayne Miller researched residency scandal. The previous act of that scandal ended comically with the Council President inviting reporters to look at his underwear. Young’s residency tribulations have yet to be totally buried and his arrogant actions and statements after Tom Kiefaber’s act of civil disobedience last week show that he does not fully understand some Baltimore voters.  Young wanted Kiefaber to say he was sorry, but there are plenty of people out there who think Young is the one who should be apologizing for his past actions.

So why does Young have no major competition and the Mayor does? City Council President is a position that many of our recent mayors have held before becoming mayor. I believe there is a decent chance of Rawlings-Blake leaving office in 2014 to run for a higher office and thus making the 2014 city council president the next mayor. Why isn’t anyone taking a chance (as of today) and taking on Young?

At least one of the current candidates running for mayor should switch races and give Young a run for his money. Even though many of our leaders stood up to support Young at his announcement, I do not think that makes him unbeatable. Such a move could backfire for a few council members if their competitors frame things the right way.

I definitely would rather see Rolley or Landers as council president. They are smart, fiscally responsible, and they can speak properly. I hope one of them takes a shot at the very beatable Young.

Who will run against Jack Young?

Posted by ameister on Monday, May 2nd, 2011

last week when I was looking over my Facebook feed, I noticed that 11th district Councilman Bill Cole had casually announced that he had filed to run for re-election in the 11th district. This ends the rumor that he was going to run against Jack Young for city council president. On Monday I will write about what office I think Bill Cole will be running for in 2015. Today I am wondering who is going to step up and run against Jack Young.

Jack Young is not an eloquent speaker and he might not even live in Baltimore. He is the incumbent, but he was not elected to the office that he currently holds. He has raised a good amount of money though. One would think that there would be more people trying to take him on than are trying to take on our current mayor who has stayed away from controversy.

I would not be shocked if Randallstown resident and 7th district representative Belinda Conaway steps up to take on Jack Young. She could be on some sort of silly bear ticket with her father Frank Conaway who is the joke candidate for mayor.

Other candidates would have to be tempted to run for city council president when there are two Pete Welch supporting non-residents of Baltimore running for the office.  Some of the rumored and official candidates for mayor should probably take a step back and think about if running for mayor is the best option when the city council president race seems to be a lot easier.

Hattie Harrison is the Agnes Welch of East Baltimore

Posted by ameister on Tuesday, February 22nd, 2011

83-year-old Delegate Hattie Harrison has represented the 45th legislative distict in the Maryland House of Delegates since 1973.  MarylandReporter.com posted a fluff piece about her last week. Why should this woman be celebrated? Has East Baltimore improved in any way since 1973?  Harrison is a Baltimore political institution that voters continue to ignorantly vote for while everything around them crumbles. She is the Agnes Welch of East Baltimore. We should be protesting such products of the political establishment.

Here is an interesting quote from the article. You can draw your own conclusions:

“The kids all knew me,” and she knew their parents, and she had no problems with discipline. Among her former students is current Baltimore City Council President Jack Young.”

Dixon and Jessamy supporter Curtis Anderson may run for City Council President

Posted by ameister on Friday, February 11th, 2011

On Wednesday the Baltimore Sun site informed the world that a local House of Delegates member wants to bring Baltimore more of the same kind of politics and ideas that have infested this city for years. Jessamy and Dixon supporter Curtis Anderson may run for City Council President.

From the Jessamy endorsement page:

“Pat Jessamy has been a tenacious and skillful crime fighter for the citizens of Baltimore City. She has come to the legislature time and again gaining new initiatives to fight crime and to make Baltimore a better place. Crime has decreased in the City because of her efforts.”

–Delegate Curt Anderson, 43rd District and Chair of the Baltimore City Delegation

Curtis Anderson sticks up for Dixon.

Other than defending the indefensible, what has this guy done for Baltimore? Baltimore does not need another do-nothing political insider.

On a personal note I was not impressed when Delegate Anderson no-showed at the Amplify Baltimore event on January 8th.

In related news Jack Young’s reelection site is live here.

My thoughts about the State of the City address

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, February 9th, 2011

You can read the entire speech here.

The Baltimore Sun gives a quick and efficient summary of Monday’s speech here.

Before the speech started City Council President Jack Young announced all the “dignitaries” in attendance. Most of the people he announced currently hold elected office. He announced two people who do not hold elected office who stood out to me: Union leader (and husband of city councilwoman and Pete Welch supporter Sharon Green Middleton) Glenn Middleton and disgraced former State Senator Larry Young. You have to love the Baltimore political establishment club. Such “dignitaries” do not give me much hope for change in local government.

Jack Young stumbled through the introductions and then the mayor took over. She talked about property taxes, ethics, and the police right away. This was a good move on her part. She wanted to show that she cares about property taxes (an issue that is clearly picking up a lot of steam), the ethical questions of the previous administration, and the disgruntled police union. Once she got these issues out of the way she really did not have anything earth shattering to say. She basically said all the right things, but really did not talk about anything big she was going to do to fix our economic problems. She brought up her father pretty early on in the speech, which is a classic move of hers.

The mayor deserves credit for addressing our economic problems. She knows the economic situation is the biggest problem facing the city and it is behind just about every other issue. It’s nice to have an administration that understands fiscal problems.  I think the mayor knows that if she tells the truth about the fiscal problems and does minor things here and there to address them that she probably will not lose the election. She is playing it safe by saying the right things.

At times the Mayor appears to have a machine-like personality and parts of the speech reflected this. It was as if she was trying to portray herself as a logical economic machine that would not lie to the people and would deal with hard emotional issues without worrying about hurt feelings. We do need a leader like this, but I wonder how much of this is just talk. The mayor said Baltimore spends more on employee benefits than we do on entire police department! Now that is bold, and it is true, but what specific hard decision is she going to make in order to correct this problem. The hard answer that a machine would give would be to drastically cut city employee benefits! The mayor did not bring that up. She did bring up a nebulous ten year economic plan. More words about a far off future instead of actions about our current problems.

There was another reason behind the Mayor’s “honest answers” rhetoric. The mayor knows that some of her competitors are talking about drastic property tax cuts. She tried to say that drastic answers have their consequences and that some people propose fanciful solutions to certain city problems.  She definitely was implying that she thought drastic property tax cuts were not the answer. I strongly disagree with her on this issue. A drastic property tax cut is something a leader who takes bold actions would embrace. Large property tax cuts are not fanciful, they are very possible if the city reevaluated how it did business with developers (giving them huge tax breaks instead of giving property tax cuts to the citizens) and if the city cut salaries, befits, and jobs of city workers.

The Mayor gave a safe speech that touched on many important issues. In the past such a speech was the perfect start to a reelection campaign. It is clear that if the Mayor is reelected that life as we know it probably will not change much. The mayor will talk a good game, but the huge positive changes that Baltimore needs to blossom will not occur. We need a leader willing to make logical big moves. The mayor could easily be this person, but at this point in time I only see her making safe little moves. It will be interesting to see how this election year plays out.

Money raised by possible City Council President candidates

Posted by ameister on Monday, February 7th, 2011

We all know that Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has raised a lot more money than her potential competitors in the race for mayor, but most people do not know how much money potential City Council President candidates have raised.

The Baltimore Sun says that in order to win the Mayoral race you need to raise between $1 million and $1.5 million. Based on that reasonable estimation a candidate would need to raise between $600k and $900k to win the City Council President race. in 2007 Rawlings-Blake raised about $540k and won the City Council President race so taking into account how many things are more expensive this year it should take more than $540k in 2011.

Right now Jack Young has $234,000 in his campaign account and Bill Cole has $69k. I have heard Cole is about to have a fundraiser although I have no confirmation from Cole. Bill Cole uses the same fundraiser (Colleen Martin-Lauer) as the Mayor does. The Mayor raised over $600k at her last fundraiser so in theory Bill Cole could raise a substantial amount of money at a similar event.

Bill Cole has yet to say if he is running for higher office. Redistricting is about to turn his current district into the most powerful district in Baltimore.

Jack Young’s economic ideas

Posted by ameister on Monday, January 24th, 2011

As President of Baltimore’s City Council Jack Young should have a basic understanding of economics. This year the council will have to deal with an $80million Fiscal 2012 budget deficit. We are going to need leaders who are willing to make hard and smart economic decisions. At the 9th District vacant seat hearing on January 4, 2011 I did not gain a lot of confidence in President Young’s fiscal abilities.

Jack Young was asking the 9th District candidates how they would increase revenue for Baltimore City. He did not ask any of the candidates how they could cut Baltimore’s spending. None of the council members (until the very end of the hearing) brought up spending cuts as a legitimate economic option. The inability or unwillingness of council members to discuss spending cuts is quite disturbing and not at all encouraging.

In the middle of his questions Young decided to briefly discuss his own budget solutions. He talked about “user fees”. He thinks that charging people who work in Baltimore (no matter where they live) a fee for the privileged of working in Baltimore is a good way to raise money and help get rid of our budget deficit. Young first tossed around a $50 user fee and then nonchalantly said “or 10% of their salaries”.

There is a HUGE difference between $50 and 10% of a person’s salary. Many people in the crowed gasped when they heard the 10% figure.  I really hope that President Young understands the difference between $50 and 10% of a person’s salary and that he only misspoke. He can get out of this by saying he misspoke. If Young is serious about a user fee for workers (and I think any user fee is a horrible idea) and if he intends on suggesting that fee be 10% of ones salary then guarantee he will gain national recognition once he formerly introduces such a proposal. Such a proposal will never pass, but if it did one could expect Baltimore to end up like this.

The full story behind the vacancy nominating committee’s selection of Pete Welch

Posted by ameister on Friday, January 7th, 2011

The 9th District empty seat saga played out inside of city hall on Tuesday and Thursday. I was there. Below is a complete summary of what happened on those memorable days.

Here are descriptions from Tuesday of what the hearing room looked like, Helen Holton, Robert Curran, Warren Branch, and Mary Pat Clarke.     Here is a link to a Baltimore Sun story that was published on Tuesday. I think it is an excellent piece and that it would have put some pressure on the City Council to do the right thing.

Dr. John Bullock was youngest of the four candidates to present his case. I believe he is in his late 20′s. He is not from Baltimore originally and is a professor at Towson. Bullock’s opening statement was the most powerful I have ever heard at such a hearing. He basically called the City Council out and told them that he knew this process was fixed and that the son of Agnes Welch would be selected. He showed no mercy on Welch or the council. He mentioned that the 9th District has suffered from “years of political neglect”. He is a very good speaker.

Bullock did not shine during the question and answer session. He is not opposed to raising property taxes and he supports a living wage bill. He did not seem to understand that taxes are not the answer, but since most of the council members also do not understand that they kept asking about taxes and user fees and he kept agreeing to them. Since Bullock was first he did not get to prepare for any of the questions. All of the other candidates knew most of the questions they were going to be asked because they had already heard them when Bullock was questioned. A few council-people changed their questions but about 75% of questions remained the same throughout the process.

Abigail Breiseth was the next candidate to present her case. She was focused on education. Breiseth is a teacher and a friend of State Senator Bill Ferguson. She admitted that she did not know a lot about taxes although she said people seem to be willing to pay higher taxes if it is for the children. She kept coming back to education. City Council really can’t do a lot when it comes to education so Breiseth may want to consider another position. Breiseth was the only one of the non-Welch candidates who complimented Agnes Welch. It was an interesting way to appeal to the members of the council.

Breiseth is clearly intelligent and came up with some nicely worded answers to questions. Like all of the other candidates she said she plans to run for the 9th district seat in September no matter who is appointed this month. I think Breiseth will be able to mobilize a pretty strong door to door campaign because of her teacher connections. On the street level her campaign will probably resemble Bill Fergusons.  The 9th District is a lot different than the 46th state level district.

Pete Welch was up next. He made all his supporters stand up. Many of his supporters were clearly older women who had been brought in just for this demonstration of support. Welch also provided the council with thirty recommendation letters. Many council members stated that they already knew Welch for a number of years. Welch named dropped his mother a few times and brought up examples of when he had helped constituents during her administration. He gave a round about living wage opinion that did hit on some important negative aspects of implementing a local living wage ordinance. He seemed to have a pretty good grasp of basic mathematics which is something many council-members do not understand.

Welch brushed away his gun and campaign finance history when Jim Kraft asked him about his past problems. Kraft also reminded the audience that he has worked with Welch for 20 years. Welch talked about how he is not rich and he could not afford to fight the cases against him. He says much of his CPA work does not generate a lot of money because he works with poor people.

Welch said that other people were exaggerating the problems in the 9th district. I guess this was his way of clearing his mother’s name and implying that a Welch could do a fine job in the 9th District. He said the 9th district had been around for 12 years although in reality the 9th district has only been around for 8 years.

There were two points during his time in front of the council that he completely lost his train of thought. In his opening statement he admitted that he had lost his train of though and in his closing statement there was a long silent pause. At one point Welch brought up a man named “Don Sutton” who he said was his “partner”, but then said was a “neighbor”. I have no idea who this guy is, but it sounds interesting. He also mentioned that someone in Florida tried to sell him a million dollar condo for $100k. Pretty good deal for a poor CPA.

Welch was definitely the establishment candidate. He dropped 9th District institutional names like Bon Secours Hospital, Tuerk House, and Food Depot. He talked about being a certified mediator. I assume he did this to prove he no longer has anger management issues. He said everything an establishment city councilman would say and I am sure this impressed many of the current establishment members.

Michael Johnson was last to present his case. Two hours had almost gone by and the crowd was pretty restless. Mary Pat Clarke and Helen Holton had already gotten up for long periods of time and Nick D’Adamo appeared to leave early. Johnson made an aggressive opening statement. You could tell that he did not appreciate Robert Curran’s statements to the local media. Johnson talked about how all the candidates could hit the ground running despite what some had said. He reminded everyone that any person could have run for the 9th district council seat in 2007 and given their time and energy to that cause. He was the only person applying for the job who had done this and he came in second place last time. I thought this was an excellent point and I thought he should have brought it up over and over again. He did not talk about it that much though. He was the only candidate there that citizens of the 9th District had supported in a past election.  Shouldn’t their opinions mean something?

Johnson talked about unemployment, safety, and the appearance of the 9th District. He is opposed to raising property taxes. He offered to drive members of the City Council around the 9th district. Curran tried to challenge him when he brought up the 88 street lights that were out in the in the 9th district. Johnson mentioned how dark streets are places where crime gravitates to. Curran said the city already spent millions on street lights. Johnson then brought up how something was clearly wrong with that. He was the only candidate to talk about auditing city spending. He actually talked about something related to cutting spending! You have to like that.

Councilwoman Conaway only spoke once during the entire hearing. She complimented Johnson for helping with job issues in the Mondawmin area. I was surprised by her positive comment. It did not seem like any of the other council-people were giving Johnson an easy time. Johnson was politely combative. He said this should not be a high tech coronation.

On Thursday the Vacancy Nominating Committee voted on who they thought should fill the empty seat. I was there.

This part of the entry could also be titled: “The City Council screwed Michael Johnson”.

You can read other stories about this vote here, here, here, and here.

I arrived at city hall right before 5PM on Thursday. The vacancy nominating committee was supposed to vote on who they wanted to fill the empty 9th District seat at 5PM.  A budget meeting ran late and was still going on when I arrived in the balcony area of the Du Burns Council Chamber. The budget meeting deserves its own post. Mary Pat Clarke demonstrated some incredible budgetary ignorance.  Stay tuned for more on that in the future.

The budget hearing ended at 5:50 and you could tell Jack Young wanted to get this vote over with. There was no break. It was announced that the 12 council-member (Rikki Spector and Helen Holton were the only council-people not on the nominating committee) committee would vote after candidate nominations were made. I knew something was fishy at this point. They could have easily just had a vote where all four candidates automatically became the only people you could vote for. Since a candidate needed to be nominated Jack Young asked for nominations. Robert Curran nominated Pete Welch and Nick D’Adamo seconded the nomination!

How sick! The most outspoken Welch “fan” who happens to be part of a political monarchy of his own makes the nomination and the soon to be retired D’Adamo seconds it without any fear of future political ramifications.

Jim Kraft said he wanted there to be more than one option. He nominated Abigail Breiseth! Huh? No offense to Abigail Breiseth, but she appeared to be the least likely to win a 9th district election. I find it hard to fathom that the people of her district would favor her over the other three candidates.  If the council selected Breiseth there would have been an uproar from the NAACP and rightfully so. Mary Pat Clarke seconded the nomination.

What did not happen next was the biggest embarrassment of the entire night. No member of Baltimore’s City Council stepped up and nominated Michael Johnson! Johnson is the only person out of the four candidates who has EVER received a single vote from a citizen of the 9th district in a real election. He came in second place with 1135 votes in the 2007 primary election in the 9th District. You mean to tell me that every single one of the members of the City Council felt those 1135 votes meant nothing?

Johnson and Bullock spoke the truth when they were interviewed by the council on Tuesday night. They called the council out and said that the decision had already been made. They were right. The council did not appreciate the truth being told in a way that rightfully embarrassed them so they paid Johnson back by not even nominating him. Of course none of the council-people who MADE A DEAL with Agnes Welch before she retired would have ever nominated Johnson because AGNES WELCH HATES MICHAEL JOHNSON. How dare someone run against Dear Leader Welch.

Breiseth was a good girl and played nice so she was allowed to play the role of the Washington Generals in this farce. Once again I need to stress that Breiseth was just a pawn in all this, she did not do anything wrong. I am sure Pete Welch is happy that this entire show might even give her some minor momentum and take away votes from Johnson in September.

So with only two candidates nominated the council-members would have an easy time explaining their Welch votes. Why on earth would they pick a inexperienced white woman with little city council financial knowledge over the experienced financially savvy (in many ways apparently) Welch? Kraft, Clarke, and Bill Henry ended up voting for Breiseth! Henry paused a bit before he voted. When Bill Cole voted for Welch he also paused and appeared, sad, uncomfortable, and disturbed. I don’t think he expected this scenario to take place.

Clarke later said she voted against Welch because of his background. That definitely was the right thing to say and she deserves credit for saying it. A part of me thinks she did not like him because he refused to support her financially crippling living wage idea.

The City Council will officially vote to fill the seat on Monday. Since the official recommendation is Welch that means Spector and Holton will also vote for him and he will win no matter what. I think it is possible since the inevitable is now obvious that the entire City Council may end up voting for Welch on Monday. It really does not matter now though. Robert Curran and his big mouth and Agnes Welch are the ultimate villains in this story. Robert Curran should be made to politically pay dearly for this injustice. Unfortunately all the other council-people have legitimate excuses because of the two candidate scenario that the committee’s procedures so conveniently brought about.

The vote itself would have only taken less than a minute had it not been for the imbecile of the council Warren Branch. Branch AGAIN felt the need to explain why he felt recommendation letters and emails of support were important.  Branch is an embarrassment to Baltimore and I feel bad for anyone who has to sit through one of his cringe-worthy “performances”.

Curran and Branch should be targeted for removal and their opponents in 2011 should be supported. I will do my part. More information will be provided soon enough.

There is one positive that came out of all of this. Agnes Welch is gone!

Michael Johnson’s campaign page can be found here.

The email I sent to members of City Council

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, January 5th, 2011

Your 9th district vote will determine your political future
1-4-2011
At some point over the next few days you are going to have to make the most important political decision of your career. Your decision will be recorded and every voter in Baltimore will have a chance to know about it. I promise you that I will remind as many voters as possible of how you voted.  You are going to have to select the best candidate to fill the 9th district city council seat vacancy.

This vote is not an opportunity to pay Agnes Welch back. Baltimore is not a hereditary monarchy despite what some have said in a few local publications.  I assure you that if you vote for Pete Welch that once I find out your vote I will publicize it in my blog over and over again for the entire 2011 election year. I will urge people to campaign against you and I will remind the world that you are an anti-democratic sell-out who does not give a darn about the poor mostly black population of the 9th district.

Do my words seem harsh? You should consider the seriousness of this situation. Walk ALONE in the 9th district one afternoon like I have.  The citizens of Baltimore are slowly getting fed up with the open corruption and political payback that many on the city council have been a part of. This vote could be the spark that ignites a a fire that removes many incumbents from office. I intend to work hard to make sure that every candidate who takes part in this predetermined travesty loses their council seat. I will contact every single one of your financial supporters and expose you. I will contact every single community association leader in your district and expose you.

Do you remember in 2008 when so many people supported Obama because he was fresh and worked hard to get where he ended up? Do you remember when many people attacked Bush because he got by on his last name and relied on his father for money, power, and fame? How is Pete Welch any different than George Bush? Since you supported Obama you will be nothing but a total hypocrite if your help propel the George W. Bush of Baltimore into his mother’s former seat. My comparison is accurate and I will remind the voters of your district that you played the role of Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, and George H.W. Bush in this anti-democratic travesty. All of this can be avoided if you take a stand against classic Baltimore political corruption and vote against Pete Welch.

I urge you to do the right thing.

See you tonight at the hearing.

Adam Meister

Video of Agnes Welch’s 9th District and why her son should not be given her council seat

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, December 29th, 2010

Last week I decided to record video footage on the streets of Baltimore’s 9th district.

YouTube Preview Image

Agnes Welch has represented this section of Baltimore since 1983. The 9th district is not in good shape. I am willing to bet that most of the members of the City Council would not walk alone around many sections of the 9th district like I did in the video. What does that say about the job their colleague did and what does it say about the council-people who have the audacity to vote for her son to take her place?

Many Baltimore leaders do not want you to know what is about to happen on January 4, 2011, they do not want to be held accountable for the further deterioration of the 9th district. The City Council will conduct a hearing that day that will help them decide who will take over the 9th District City Council seat vacated by Agnes Welch. Agnes Welch wants her son William A. “Pete” Welch to take over her seat since he is her son. William A. “Pete” Welch once fired a handgun during a “post-election dispute”. Welch has gotten into campaign-related trouble during his mother’s campaigns.

Every City Council member knows that Pete Welch should not be given the seat, but since they are friends with his mother they will do what she wants. If they choose to support Mr. Welch simply because of  his mother, then it is obvious that they could care less about the people of the 9th District. The filling of a vacant city council seat should not be done out of loyalty to a friend or political supporter. The City Council is spitting in the face of the voters of Baltimore if they select the son of a councilperson just because of familial connections. No member of the City Council deserves to be reelected in 2011 if they corruptly establish a hereditary monarchy in the already impoverished and downtrodden 9th District.

You can find your councilperson’s email address here.  Email your councilperson and Council President Jack Young and tell them they will not have your vote in 2011 if they commit this “old boy network” maneuver. Tell them that you will vigorously campaign against them and donate generously to opponents’ campaigns. Will Baltimore leaders continue to do things the “old way” or will they do the right thing and establish a new uncorrupted precedent? The fate of the 9th District is in the hands of the City Council, but you can influence matters by playing hardball with your representative and emailing them your firm thoughts.

It would be interesting if Pete Welch is selected by the City Council and if an organized group of people randomly selected one of the council-members who voted for him and made it their main goal in 2011 to make sure this council-member lost his election. Accountability can hurt, but it is something with which the current council is very unfamiliar with.  It is finally time for the City Council to be held accountable for its actions.

I will email every member of the City Council a link to this article.