Posts Tagged ‘Red Line’

Public transportation observations- Charm City Circulator and the Red Line

Posted by ameister on Friday, July 16th, 2010

Let’s talk about public transportation!

On Tuesday I had jury duty (more about that experience soon) at 8:15 AM at the Mitchell courthouse. I left my house in Reservoir Hill at 7:35 and walked down North Avenue to Penn Station. On the Saint Paul street side of Penn station I jumped on the Charm City Circulator which pulled up at about 7:57. At first it had about five people on it including two guys who looked like they were just riding it so they did not have to sit outside. There was one worker on the bus who appeared to be an observer. She talked to the driver a little bit. We were about to pull away when a few people ran toward the bus. Then more people ran toward the bus. A train had just arrived and quite a few of the people who were on the train knew about the circulator and got on it. The circulator is supposed to be for tourists, but this morning it was packed with savvy commuters. We pulled away at about 8:03. At Preston street we picked up more commuters. It was standing room only! We made it to the courthouse area at 8:14.

My commute back home was a little different. I arrived at the Fayette street stop at 4:09PM. A circulator bus approached soon after I arrived, but it had a “Not in Service” message on its front (even though it appeared filled with people) so it skipped the stop. 10 minutes later a circulator arrived. There were actually a few tourists on this bus. As we made our way up Charles street more people got on, but it was not as crowded as it was in the morning. Once again there were two guys in the back who were just trying to stay on the bus for as long as possible. Most people got off at Penn Station.

I was once told that the circulator would get white people more comfortable with riding the bus. It appears the circulator does have a broad appeal across races. I would say that 60% of the people on the bus were white, there were also quite a few Asians, and the rest (about 30%) were black. The bus was very clean and there was a TV on the ceiling that promoted tourist traps… I mean attractions.

The Charm City Circulator proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the proposed Charles Street Trolley is a total waste and a horrible idea. The Charm City Circulator does everything the Trolley would do. The Charm City Circulator is helping bring all sorts of people and vitality to the Charles Street corridor and is serving as a viable commuting option. It gets cars off the streets and it does not clog up Charles street. I highly recommend that you try out the circulator the next time you need to travel on the Charles/Saint Paul Street corridor.

In other public transportation news, I stumbled upon this Red Line article yesterday. Please take a moment to read why we must expand our current heavy rail line instead of wasting billions on a foolish light rail idea.

Do the Red Line right the first time

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

The Red Line “Locally Preferred Alternative” is a terrible idea. The Red Line should not be a light rail line. If the MTA wants to do things the right way then they need to make the Red Line a heavy rail subway system with a a transfer point that connects to the existing Owings Mills to Johns Hopkins subway line. A partial single track light rail line is the equivalent of a school system purchasing computers from 2001 just because they are cheaper. Those 2001 model computers are out of date and will need to be replaced almost immediately. In the long run it will cost the school system a lot more money because they did not do the right thing from the start.

A heavy rail subway system is fast and actually gets people to places they want to go. I remember how during Artscape my friend commented on how great it was to take the subway from Owings Mills to Artscape. By taking the subway my friend did not have to worry about finding parking and driving in in Baltimore’s obnoxious traffic.

There is no point in saving money now when the project you are building will need twice that amount of money in the future to correct the problem you are creating by saving the money now. We need to allocate the hundreds of millions of dollars that the supporters of the Charles Street Trolley want to the Red Line.

I have been told that the city of Honolulu will get a substantial amount of federal money for their public transportation project.  If secluded Honolulu can figure out a way to fund their project then Baltimore can come up with a way to fund a heavy rail project that is not done on the cheap.

For months the people over at the Transit Riders Action Council of Metropolitan Baltimore (TRAC) and I have been saying that Alternative 4C and any other red line plan that is mostly on the surface and is light rail is a total waste of money. One of TRAC’s leaders (Nate Payer) posted some well thought out statements over at this blog.

Do not be fooled by the so-called big names and big organizations who say that light rail is the best solution to the Red Line dilemma and that people who are against this plan are only NIMBY’s.   TRAC has proven on numerous occasions through well thought out logic that Heavy Rail is the only logical solution.   All the plans presented by all the so-called big names and groups are nothing more than development schemes designed to enrich a few.