Posts Tagged ‘Stephanie Rawlings-Blake’

The start of the political earthquake in Baltimore

Posted by ameister on Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011

There are so many little local political tidbits I need to mention. This earthquake gave me a great title that will allow me to talk about all of my recent political observations in one entry.

The truly earthquake-like event that I observed on Saturday was the mayor’s first mailing. With a little over three weeks before the election the mayor sent out a full color, two-sided, thick paper, oversized, crime themed mailer. I assume every super voter in Baltimore received this Rawlings-Blake promotion. It basically says the mayor is awesome and she is especially awesome at fighting crime.  There will be other large mailers from the mayor coming out very soon and I assume they also will be themed. We are beginning to see what the money she raised is buying. She is doing what all well-funded politicians in Baltimore do: inundating the super voters with large  colorful propaganda pieces over the final three weeks of the campaign. It looks like our mayor has so much money that she has started her mailings a little early. I predict I get seven mailers from her.

In past articles I have mentioned some of the hard working candidates I have randomly run into during my travels around Baltimore. On Thursday night at the Best of Baltimore magazine party I ran into first district Candidate Jason Kahler.  Jason was taking a break from pounding the pavement and meeting first district voters. He actually recognized me and said hello. He is a nice guy and has his work cut out for him. George Della gave incumbent Jim Kraft three times the amount of money that Kahler has raised! The establishment’s financial advantage always finds new ways to sicken me.

On Friday night I was at the Windup Space on North Avenue. I did not expect to find any candidates there even though one Saturday night I found Odette Ramos a few doors down at Liam’s.  I was pleasantly surprised to run into 12th district candidate Jason Curtis. Curtis was out on Patrol with police on segways. He has done this many times over the last few years. He let me ride his segway for a little bit. I had never been on one before. They are easy to get the hang of.  Jason and Odette are giving Carl Stokes a real run for his money. Both challengers have raised impressive amounts of money. I will write about this in another article soon (I hope).

Last night in Hampden there was a political forum and I ran into Jason Curtis and Odette Ramos again. The forum was for Mayoral, City Council President, 7th district, 12th district, and 14th district candidates. The mayor and Jack Young did not show up. Catherine Pugh can really zoom through all of her talking points. You can tell she has done this before. Landers and Rolley were also their usually solid selves. I was impressed that all three candidates stayed at the event for long periods of time. They are really trying hard and are taking the challenge very seriously.

The night really was quite boring. Most of the people in attendance already had their minds made up on who they were going to vote for in most of the races. The biggest spark of the evening came from City Council President Candidate Tom Kiefaber.  Tom can be a very effective speaker when he wants to be. It is a shame that Jack Young will not debate him. Tom made a passionate plea for new blood in Baltimore politics. He ripped on the media for favoring well-funded candidates and he spoke candidly about the corruption that infests Baltimore politics.  I wished more people could have heard his call for new youthful leadership, it was the highlight of the night.

Political contributions by the president of Baltimore Racing Development

Posted by ameister on Tuesday, August 16th, 2011

The Baltimore Sun did not include the political contributions of Baltimore Grand Prix and Baltimore Racing Development President James Davidson in the long article about the race (that you should read) that they published.

The Sun also did not include the political contributions of Baltimore Racing Development investor Walker Mygatt.

Keiffer Mitchell, Bill Cole, and Stephanie Rawlings-Blake all played major roles in bringing the Grand Prix to Baltimore:

Candidates Account Contributor Name(Address) Amount Date Received Contribution Type
Cole, William Friends of James Davidson
(33 Tenby Court ,
Lutherville, MD, 21093)
$1,000.00 03/23/2010 Ticket purchases by Individuals
Kamenetz, (Kevin) Committee For James Davidson
(8 Treadwell Ct. ,
Lutherville, MD, 21093)
$250.00 06/15/2010 Ticket purchases by Individuals
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of James Davidson
(8 Treadwell Court ,
Lutherville, MD, 21093)
$500.00 08/12/2010 Individual
Rawlings-Blake, Stephanie For Baltimore James Davidson
(33 Tenby Ct. ,
Lutherville, MD, 21093)
$1,000.00 04/14/2010 Individual
Young, Bernard C. Friends Of JAMES DAVIDSON
(8 TREADWELL COURT ,
LUTHERVILLE, MD, 21043)
$500.00 06/16/2010 Ticket purchases by Individuals
Cole, William Friends of Walker Mygatt
(115 W. Lee Street ,
Baltimore, MD, 21201)
$1,000.00 03/23/2010 Ticket purchases by Individuals
Cole, William Friends of Walker Mygatt
(115 W. Lee Street ,
Baltimore, MD, 21201)
$100.00 08/12/2002 Ticket purchases by Individuals
Mitchell, Keiffer Jackson Jr. Friends Of Walker Mygatt
(115 W Lee St ,
Baltimore, MD, 21201-2420)
$250.00 04/10/2007 Individual
Mitchell, Keiffer Jackson Jr. Friends Of Walker Mygatt
(115 W Lee St ,
Baltimore, MD, 21201-2420)
$250.00 03/08/2007 Individual
O’Malley, Martin Friends Of Walker Mygatt
(115 W Lee St ,
Baltimore, MD, 21201-2420)
$500.00 01/12/2010 Individual
Rawlings-Blake, Stephanie For Baltimore Walker Mygatt
(115 W. Lee Street ,
Baltimore, MD, 21201-2420)
$1,000.00 01/11/2011 Individual
Rawlings-Blake, Stephanie For Baltimore Walker Mygatt
(115 W. Lee Street ,
Baltimore, MD, 21201-2420)
$1,000.00 04/14/2010 Individual

Trees, Troy, and TRAC!

Posted by ameister on Sunday, August 7th, 2011

Now that the frivolous Conaway lawsuit is history there are new (and this time legitimate) political lawsuits emerging in Baltimore.

By now many of you have heard about the trees that are slated to be cut down to make room for the Baltimore Grand Prix. You can view the David Troy headlined lawsuit to stop the tree removal here.  You can learn more about the pro-tree side at the Trees Before Grand Prix Facebook page and at the TreesB4Prix Twitter feed. David Troy is a prominent Otis Rolley supporter so some people are using that fact to make this into a Rolley vs. Rawlings-Blake battle.

Since I first posted this story over the weekend I have received some new information. You can sign the Trees before Grand Prix petition here, it currently has over 4,100 signatures. Mayoral candidate Jody Landers is one of the signers of the petition. TreesB4Prix has some requests for the City of Baltimore and Baltimore Racing Development that you can read here.

My friends at TRAC (Transit Riders Action Council) are at it again. The MTA wants to implement some service changes, but according to TRAC the MTA did not properly notify riders. TRAC is trying to stop the changes in court and get the MTA to go through the proper notification process. Below is a TRAC press release I received on Thursday. The judge will supposedly issue a written decision soon as to whether to accept or reject MTA’s motion to dismiss TRAC’s case.


www.getontrac.org

PRESS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

August 4, 2011

Transit advocate files court claim against MTA

Claim disputes legality of hearing process for recent bus service changes

Edward Cohen, member and former president of the Transit Riders Action Council, will appear in Baltimore City circuit court tomorrow for a civil motion hearing on a writ of mandamus he has brought against the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA).

The filing claims the MTA violated Maryland Transportation Code 7-506 which was enacted to guarantee a time frame for public comment and input which could impact a final decision for service changes. This law was passed in 2005 after TRAC advocated for legislation to ensure a fair and consistent process for service changes so that riders would not be adversely affected. The MTA supported the legislation. The law requires the MTA to implement its proposed changes between 6 weeks and 6 months after its public hearings. If the public hearing process is found to be defective, the MTA may not implement the change unless it makes a reasonable effort to correct the inadequacy or defect and a legally sufficient public hearing is held.

The hearing is scheduled for Friday, August 5th at 2:30 pm in Baltimore City circuit court, Case# 24-C-11-0035330C Civil.

###

Contact: Nate Payer

Phone: (410) 837-0225 e-mail: getontrac@gmail.com

A Rawlings-Blake push poll

Posted by ameister on Saturday, August 6th, 2011

On Friday around 3:30PM I received a call from the Rawlings-Blake campaign. This call was not a robo-call, there actually was a live person on the other end of the line. The woman gave a quick 30-second Rawlings-Blake promo that focused on schools. It was pretty generic education talk, the kind of stuff that impresses most voters unfortunately.  The woman then asked me if I was going to support Rawlings-Blake in September. I replied: “do you mean am I going to vote for her in September?” The woman said yes that’s what I mean. It was at that point that I realized that this was a true push poll.  In March I thought I had revived a push poll call, and I guess that was a less “pushy” version of one.

The mayor is just starting to spend her campaign fortune. I bet I receive more phone calls. The TV and radio ads are going to hit the airwaves soon. The mailings will probably start to flow after the middle of August. Right now it looks like Catherine Pugh has quite a few signs up and a few Pugh fans think that is a good omen. Pugh’s signs cost money and she does not have nearly as much money as Rawlings-Blake does. Pugh, Rolley, and Landers may have fired the first shots, but Rawlings-Blake is about to unleash numerous nukes.  Get ready for many more generic education talking points.

The debate over the mayor’s debate strategy

Posted by ameister on Friday, August 5th, 2011

On Tuesday night there was a mayoral debate (officially a candidates’ forum) at the Empowerment Temple in northwest Baltimore. Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake did not attend this event and many people criticized her for her absence. This was a great strategic move by the mayor!

For some reason somebody decided it was a smart idea to schedule a debate on the same night as National Night Out. On National Night Out, neighborhoods in every part of Baltimore have gatherings where citizens celebrate their neighborhoods and congregate to take a stand against violence and other anti-social activities that plague Baltimore. National Night Out is a great time to meet voters. It would only take two or three stops at random National Night Out events to encounter more impressionable voters than if one would have participated in the Empowerment Temple debate.

The mayor can only hurt herself by debating her opponents. I know it is incredibly frustrating for supporters of her competitors, but the mayor’s people realize that candidate forums are not worth the effort for mayoral candidates. The audiences at these forums are filled with voters who are part of candidate entourages who have already made up their minds. Few people in Baltimore pay attention to debates and the media hardly covers them. A large percentage of voters in Baltimore do not pay attention to politics and have no interest in activities that surround elections. I wish it were different. The mayor’s people have her on a very generic and proven path. Raise a lot of money, do nothing controversial, say as little as possible, as the election nears spend all of your money on advertising and mailings that will inundate the average Baltimore voter who hardly cares, and on September 13th enjoy your easy victory.

I would have advised a competitor to try and upstage the mayor by refusing to attend the debate because he or she wanted to be with the people at National Night Out and because he or she believes in a separation of church and state. The Mayor’s challengers showed that they are willing to play the “church game” that all Baltimore politicians (including the Mayor) take part in. Imagine if a candidate would have taken a stand against the church game and Reverend Jamal Bryant by refusing to attend an event at that church. Take a look at this old Baltimore Sun article to learn a little bit about the reverend behind the church where the debate was held. Why exactly do mayoral candidates feel the need to give this place legitimacy?

Bryant and his wife, a former model, are known for their flashy lifestyle, which includes a Bentley and a multimillion-dollar Canton waterfront property. Their lifestyle has attracted criticism from those who say the church is more about his business enterprises and building wealth than religion. Her original divorce complaint stated that he earned more than $350,000 a year.

AFL-CIO endorsements

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, July 27th, 2011

On Thursday the AFL-CIO handed out its local political endorsements.  The mainstream media did not cover this event. I wonder if the lack of coverage represents lack of manpower on the part of the mainstream media or union irrelevancy amongst most voters? I contacted the AFL-CIO on Friday and asked for a full list of who they endorsed, but they never wrote me back. I can not find a simple full list anywhere.  Hassan Giordano did cover the endorsements here.  Hassan does mention that the AFL-CIO endorsed Nick Mosby in the 7th District, no candidate in the 13th, and all the incumbents in the other districts (and for mayor). There is no incumbent in the 2nd District, but I found out on Twitter that the AFL-CIO endorsed former Stephanie Rawlings-Blake employee Brandon Scott. Scott might as well be an incumbent though, watch this video where all sorts of establishment leaders endorse him .

Establishment organizations like the AFL-CIO only endorse people they think are going to win so this is an encouraging sign for those who received endorsements.

Examples of the power of incumbency in Baltimore

Posted by ameister on Friday, July 15th, 2011

Last Friday at 4:15 PM I went down to the municipal building next to city hall to pay my water bill.  On one of the counters were a bunch of full color “VOTE FOR MAYOR Stephanie RAWLINGS-BLAKE” flyers. Since it was the end of the work day/week it was pretty obvious that they had not just been placed there. This is another example of the advantages of being an incumbent. I do not think a challenger’s flyers would last very long in the municipal building.

The 12th district race is going to show if incumbency is powerful enough to beat door knocking, grassroots endorsements/support, and sheer determination. I ran into Odette Ramos at the brand new Liam Flynn’s Ale House (an incredibly positive sight on North Avenue) on Saturday night.  Odette  was in a great mood considering that she is now running against incumbent Carl Stokes who was expected to run for mayor. I wonder if the citizens will care that the incumbent’s first choice was to run for higher office and is only using his current position as a back up?  The people who supported Odette in this video have not changed their minds so that is great news. I do not like flakes.

Odette and the other challengers are going to have a hard time dealing with the name recognition that Stokes brings to the table, although, since Robert Stokes is still in the race, there could be confusion, and Carl could end up losing votes to Robert. Robert is currently on Carl’s staff. The Stokes vs Stokes aspect of this race brings an added dimension to this race.

It is important to point out that Carl Stokes was appointed to his current seat by the City Council when Jack Young became City Council President in 2010. Stokes lost the city council president election in 2003 and the race of mayor in 1999. Stokes has not won an election since 1995!

Have a great Artscape weekend and be sure to check out 80′s Karaoke on the Charles Street bridge!

Ignore the the Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance and they probably will go away

Posted by ameister on Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

Catherine Pugh was angry about the Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance blindly endorsing the mayor so she made an uncomfortable appearance at their endorsement announcement meeting. Tactically this was a good move by Pugh because she successfully garnered a lot of media attention for her campaign. She wants to be seen as the mayor’s main competitor and aggressively challenging the mayor this way goes a long way toward attaining that status.

Why give the Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance any legitimacy? Who do these guys think they are? Do you know anyone who bases their decisions on what these guys say? A bolder and better move that Rolley and Landers should consider is a press release that says the Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance is part of old school Baltimore politics and they want nothing to do with such a group. A bold candidate would say that they would be ashamed to receive an endorsement from such an outdated pseudo-political group.

On a somewhat related note, I noticed a lot of Pugh lawn signs in the 40th District (the district Pugh currently represents) during my run up Liberty Heights this afternoon. It looks like her campaign went door to door around there recently. There were also door hangers on the ground.

You can watch parts of the Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance’s endorsement announcement here.

Now is the perfect time to review my 2008 “Separation of Church and State does not exist In Baltimore” article.

New campaign videos from Rolley and Rawlings-Blake

Posted by ameister on Monday, July 11th, 2011

The following Otis Rolley campaign video was just posted on Twitter

YouTube Preview Image

The Mayor has quite a few videos on her campaign’s private Youtube Channel. Once you know the URL of one video you can find links to other videos. Below are the videos I found:

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image

Mysterious anti-Rawlings-Blake video

Posted by ameister on Friday, July 8th, 2011

I discovered the following video in the comments section of a recent Baltimore Sun article. The Youtube user is named Blakefake2011 and this is the only video posted on his or her channel. The video does not encourage the viewer to vote for a specific candidate so it is hard to tell if any candidate is behind this. I will keep checking the channel to see if anything else noteworthy is added.

The following video was uploaded on June 29, 2011:

YouTube Preview Image