By Cal Ripken, Jr. | April 13, 2011
Most baseball fans out there are hearing a lot of opinions this morning about the play that resulted in an injury to the Rangers’ Josh Hamilton. The Rangers and Josh are under scrutiny and taking criticism for the play. I see it another way.
First and foremost, it was a good play. He did not put himself at any greater risk than sliding into third on his triple, or when he stretches a single into a double and goes head first like he did against the Red Sox. The risk on this play is very similar to a wild pitch or passed ball where the pitcher is covering home. This play was only “stupid” because it ended in an injury.
Just because this situation is rare, does not mean the judgment was not sound. There was a good chance to score on this play as evidenced by how close the play was at home. What if there was a wild pitch and it squirted away from the catcher and Josh tried to score and slid to avoid the tag and got hurt, would that be a stupid risk? It would be more the norm and probably accepted right away.
All this fits within the Ranger philosophy of running aggressively on the bases and putting pressure on the defense. Remember last year when the Rangers scored two runs from second base on ground ball plays to first in the playoffs against Tampa Bay? Remember the double steal the Rangers pulled off against the Yankees? Is that putting Elvis Andrus at risk by stealing home? You cannot turn this on and off, you either believe in it and practice it every day, or you play another way.
Should Hamilton change his style of play? I don’t think so. He is a big strong man who has great speed. That is an advantage and makes him the player that he is. It would be “stupid” not to take advantage of all his skills. Should he stop stealing bases? Should he stop scoring from first on a double because there could be a play at the plate? Should he try not to score from second base with two outs on a hard base hit to an outfielder?
Discretion can be used without changing his overall style of play. As a base runner he has a choice of sliding head first or feet first. Feet first is generally safer, especially when sliding into home with the catcher wearing all that protective equipment. As a base runner you have a choice on breaking up double plays. You could have a football flashback and look for big contact or you could slide in and disrupt the footwork of the pivot man. As a base runner he has a choice of running over the catcher or sliding when he is dead out at home.
Defensively he has choices as well. He has the choice of diving at full speed to make a catch or pulling up and holding it to a single. The game situation dictates when to take that chance, but it is the outfielders’ judgment and choice. Josh has a choice of crashing into the wall or pulling up and playing the ball off the wall. Derek Jeter had a choice of diving into the stands or not on that famous catch he made a few years back.
In the end discretion is managing your risk. There should be a little risk management as a part of everyone’s game.
The risk for this play was no different than the many risks that Josh normally takes on the bases.
It shouldn’t be criticized but rather applauded and accepted as good baseball.
Follow Ripken Baseball: www.Twitter.com/RipkenBaseball



Ripken Baseball represents the endeavors of Cal Ripken, Jr. and his brother Bill Ripken since they retired from playing baseball professionally. The Baltimore-based company is on a mission to grow the game of baseball worldwide, the Ripken Way.