Gala Still On

Posted by Bill Ripken on Thursday, February 11th, 2010

Cal Ripken Sr FoundationDespite the huge amount of snow dumped across Baltimore, we’re still on schedule for the Aspire Gala, our biggest annual fundraiser for the Cal Ripken, Sr. Foundation.

A while back, Junior and I started the Sr. Foundation to honor Dad, and over the years its become a great way to continue having a positive impact on kids through the game of baseball. We’ve built new parks in distressed areas and brought our baseball camps to inner city environments where kids may not always have the chance to enjoy a simple game of baseball.

Our annual gala helps raise the money that makes it all possible, so no epic snow storm is going to stop us, and hopefully it won’t stop anybody else from coming down to make a donation or just learn more about what the great people at our Foundation accomplish every year.

You can go straight to the Foundation’s website to learn more, www.ripkenfoundation.org, but here are the basics about tomorrow night’s event:

Aspire: A Tribute to Life’s Coaches

On February 12th at the Baltimore Marriott Waterfront, the Cal Ripken, Sr. Foundation will pay tribute to those who truly make a difference in the lives of others. The event begins at 5:30pm and guests include many celebrities and outstanding individuals in their respective fields.

Three honorees will be recognized:

Joe Ehrmann – former Baltimore Colt and founder of Building Men & Women for Others, will receive the 2010 Cal Sr. Award.

Arthur B. Modell – philanthropist and legendary Baltimore Ravens and Cleveland Browns owner, he’ll be honored with the Charles M. Cawley Legacy Award.

Jackie Joyner-Kersee – Olympic gold medalist whom Sports Illustrated named the greatest female athlete of the 20th Century, she will be honored with the Aspire Award.

Master Baseball’s Basics Now

Posted by Bill Ripken on Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

Bill at CampNow is the time for mastering the basics. I’ve been doing some traveling lately with Cal and John Habyan for our Coaching Clinics.

Last weekend we were in Chicago. The weekend before that, Richmond. Coming up later this month, we’ll be in Boston. Out of that tour, there’s no doubt that Mother Nature has been putting a hurtin’ on the Northeast this winter.

Richmond was mild… somewhere in the teens or twenties. Chicago was downright cold, never getting out of the single digits. And I don’t really expect Boston to be any better than it is here in Baltimore, as we stare down a Nor’easter this weekend.

That’s why this is the best time of year to master the basics of baseball, a point Cal and I try to get across to the coaches attending our clinics. Teams are stuck indoors this time of year and they’re not going outside any time soon. In that atmosphere, there’s no need to overload kids with more advanced aspects of the game.

Trying to cover bunt defenses and pickoff plays just doesn’t make sense in the confinements of a gym.

Break baseball down and you’re dealing with a simple catch and throw game. That’s all it is and that’s what you need to focus on as a coach in these winter months. Enforce proper fielding positions, make sure your players are throwing and catching correctly. Let these basics slide now and you’re looking at a tough season when spring and summer finally roll around. No team is beyond refining the simple fundamentals of catching and throwing.

Improve catching and throwing now and you’ll find the more advanced pieces come easier when you do get outside.

At our Coaching Clinics, we cover some of the more advanced aspects of baseball: the daylight play, situational defense, rundowns, disguising signs. It’s all great stuff, but it’s meant to give these coaches ammunition for the entire season. Don’t go covering all those things when you only have a gym floor to work with.

Take the time indoors to master the basics and save the advanced instruction for when you hit the field.

Interested in attending the upcoming Ripken Baseball Coaching Clinic in Boston? Head to www.ripkenbaseball.com for more.

Lincecum and Arbitration

Posted by Bill Ripken on Thursday, January 21st, 2010

Tim Lincecum by OlympianX, FlickrSo the NL Cy Young Award winner is headed to arbitration. That’s a road I would not want to go down if I were the San Francisco Giants.

Tim Lincecum comes to the table asking for $13 million, a number he’s definitely worth, especially considering the amount of success he has had in his first three years. Tell me, how can the Giants straight-face an arbitrator and say that Lincecum is worth just $8 million?

Typically, in the arbitration process, a player’s salary is put up against his peers. Lincecum is a 3-year player, so usually we’d be stacking him up against other guys entering their fourth season to determine a reasonable salary. But how many other 3-year players even compare?

Tim has separated himself from the entire league. He’s led the league in strikeouts the past two seasons, has a career ERA of just 2.90, and owns the last two Cy Young Awards.

That just screams to not have this go to an arbitrator. In the arbitration process, the club will have to try to prove that Lincecum isn’t worth $13 million – and going down that road can breed a lot of ill feelings between the Giants and a young ace that could be the future of that franchise.

If I were the ownership, I would do everything I could to end this process now, before an arbitrator gets into the mix. Why not meet in the middle and offer Tim $10.5 million. That’s reasonable. Or better yet, put this problem to bed for three years and throw Tim a 3-year, $40 million deal.

Then just let Tim go out there and win another Cy Young.

Big Mac’s Admission

Posted by Bill Ripken on Friday, January 15th, 2010

I’ve held onto this for a few days. On Monday, Mark McGwire admitted to using steroids during his career, and I wanted to take some time to fully absorb what I had heard. Not because this news came as a surprise, but because of the specific statements Big Mac made regarding his reasons for using PEDs and his defense of his personal achievements on the field.

First and foremost, I want to clarify that I am not here to bash Mark McGwire. I always respected him on the field. In my interactions with Mark, during short visits at first base, he always seemed like a nice guy.

But I take offense to some of the statements McGwire made on Monday.

First, Big Mac explained that he only used PEDs to speed his recovery time from various injuries during his career. Okay. I’m fine with that thought process, but the problem lies in the fact that he took things that were not administered by team doctors. McGwire took a back alley approach to recovering faster, rather than going through the proper resources and getting help the right way.

Second, I’m offended by the mere fact that McGwire claims PEDs had no effect on his performance during the decade he used them. That just defies my way of thinking.

I’ll agree that no pill or injection is going to help a ballplayer’s hand-eye coordination. But you can’t tell me the size and strength that McGwire gained from PEDs had zero impact on the number of balls he sent sailing out of the yard. If you’re playing clean and you just miss the ball and hit it 390 feet, then you get on the juice and develop enough strength where you’re just missing the ball and launching it 420 feet – then that stuff definitely helped you hit some home runs.

Finally, McGwire said he wished he had never played in the “steroid era,” and that one really bothers me. It just feels like he’s passing the buck, putting the emphasis on the time in which he played rather than on his own decisions.

I played in that same era and I happen to strongly believe that the users of steroids were in the minority. The majority of us played au naturel.

McGwire can’t blame the steroid era because there is no era without him. His home run chase defined the steroid era. He is the poster boy. When people look back and think “steroid era,” they will always think Mark McGwire first.

Scott Boras, Super Agent

Posted by Bill Ripken on Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

Think what you want of Scott Boras, but he gets his job done. Better than anyone else in his industry.

He always gets top-dollar for his clients, and in the case of Matt Holliday’s recent signing with the St. Louis Cardinals, Boras has elevated his status to another level.

Not only did Holliday’s contract blow away Jason Bay’s—who you could argue is the better player of the two biggest free agent outfielders of this off-season—but in the end, Holliday finds himself in a much better situation than Bay.

Bay is certainly getting paid, having signed a $66 million, four-year deal with the Mets. While he’s getting close to top-dollar, he’s also now playing for a team that lost 92 games in 2009.

Over in St. Louis, Boras landed Holliday a seven-year deal for $120 million with the Cards, a team that typically doesn’t delve deep into its pockets for free agents.

In the end, both Bay and Holliday will be making comparable money on a yearly basis: Bay at about $16.5 million per year, Holliday at about $17 million per year.

Boras’ super agent ability is what makes the real difference though. Bay will be playing for a struggling franchise trying to rebound from a dismal season, while Holliday finds himself returning to a team that just came off a playoff run and has a very good chance to return to the playoffs in 2010. Not to mention the fact that Holliday finds himself in the same lineup as Albert Pujols, and the reality that St. Louis is a much more relaxed playing atmosphere than New York.

Who has the better chance of bringing home a World Series Championship during the life of their new contract? That’s a no-brainer.

Looking beyond fiscal numbers, there’s no doubt Boras got Holliday the best deal possible.

We all know Boras always seeks top-dollar for his clients, regardless of where that money comes from. But with the Holliday deal, Boras has achieved perfection. He placed his client in the best possible atmosphere and earned him the biggest paycheck, and that’s never easy when you’re looking for top-dollar in the major leagues.

The Evil Empire – At It Again

Posted by Bill Ripken on Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

The Evil Empire is at it again.

By acquiring Curtis Granderson and now Javier Vazquez, the Yankees have secured their spot atop the AL East going into 2010 and are now the odds-on favorites to go all the way back to the World Series. And I wouldn’t bet against them winning it all again.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I can’t think of a single time in the history of the game that a World Series Champion went into the off-season after winning the title and then acquired a 30-homer guy like Granderson. Playing in New York is a very different atmosphere, and Granderson can be streaky, but if you don’t think he’s going to hit another 30 at that softball field they’ve built in the Bronx, then you’re kidding yourself. The Yanks have taken an already potent offense, and made it even stronger.

And that offense takes a lot of pressure off the starting rotation, which now has Javier Vazquez filling in the four spot. This is a guy who placed fourth in the voting for the NL Cy Young this year, and he’s going to be penciled in at the back-end of the Yankee rotation. Vazquez won’t post a 2.8 ERA against the lineups he’ll be facing in the AL East, but he won’t need to with that Yankee offense behind him.

By adding both Granderson and Vazquez, the Yanks have no doubt increased the chances of polishing off their 2010 season with another parade through the Canyon of Heroes.

And who’s to say they’re done? Left field is still wide open for the Yanks, and I don’t really think that Damon is in the mix. Will they give Gardner a chance to play every day out there, or will the Yankees delve deeper into their wallets for someone like Jason Bay or Matt Holliday – the two biggest free agents still on the market.

I’ve heard the cost to acquire one of those sluggers may be too high, even for the Empire. But I don’t know if I believe that, simply because no one has ever been too expensive for the Yankees.

Wolf Deal a Warning

Posted by Bill Ripken on Friday, December 11th, 2009

With the Winter Meetings concluded, a lot of the big-name free agents still remain on the market. Not Randy Wolf though, and I think he deserves a lot of credit for how he handled his free agency.

Randy didn’t let his eyes wander around the league, looking at all the other deals being made or discussed. He knew what he wanted, he found a situation and an offer that fit him well, and he jumped on it. Good for him. There aren’t many guys around anymore who will go into free agency and accept the first fair deal that comes their way. No, they’ll test the waters and wait for some team to hurl up an enormous offer.

Raul Ibanez made a very similar deal last year. The Phillies made him a fair offer coming out of the ’08 Winter Meetings. Ibanez took it and he went out and played quality baseball for a great team.

Take a fair deal and go play your game.

The Wolf deal should serve as a heads up to the remaining free agents, an example they should consider following. Don’t get too greedy, don’t worry about anyone else in the league, and don’t wait around for the absolute perfect deal. That’s not to say the $30 million that Wolf is going to get over the next three years is anything to shake a stick at, but many guys in his position might have turned down the Brewers’ offer in favor of finding an even better deal – something that may never have come along.

It was a two-way street. The Brewers didn’t step beyond their means. Instead, they stayed within themselves and filled their need for a quality left-handed starter, and they accomplished that goal early-on in the off-season.

My advice to the remaining free agents – worry about yourself, ignore all the other deals being made and just look for one that fits you. You don’t need a blockbuster deal to find your place on the diamond.

Millwood Arrives

Posted by Bill Ripken on Thursday, December 10th, 2009

As the Winter Meetings were winding down, the Orioles managed to take a step in the right direction by landing veteran right-hander Kevin Millwood.

I wrote over the weekend about the need for the Orioles to acquire a seasoned starter in order to bring some guidance to a roster laden with young, promising arms. A guy like Millwood can bring just that type of balance to their rotation, along with the endurance to carry 200 innings while posting a sub-3.70 ERA.

He’ll be the Orioles’ ace come the season’s start, and my bet is he’ll do well all season long. Similar to his move to Texas, a change like this could help Millwood put up some solid numbers. He has the winning attitude that every number one starter should, and he also possesses the ability to go deep into games even when he doesn’t have his best stuff. With those skills, Millwood will set a great example for the younger guys.

Plus, a guy like Millwood can go out every 5th day and keep the Orioles in the game. His arrival pushes the younger arms deeper into the rotation, where they’ll find a more natural fit and have a lot of pressure lifted.

Acquiring Millwood could also open up some more doors for making moves before spring training starts. Now that the pitching rotation has found more stability, the Orioles can consider making some riskier moves that have a high upside, moves they may not have considered before.

Take a guy like Erik Bedard, I’ll use him as an example because he played for the Orioles as recently as 2007 before going to Seattle. Before the Millwood acquisition, the Orioles didn’t have a lot of room to risk picking up a hurler like Bedard. While Bedard’s stuff on the mound has never been questioned; there’s always been some worry about his durability at the major league level.

Now that the Orioles have Millwood in the rotation, they can be more comfortable taking a risk on a guy like Bedard, someone who can throw electric stuff but may or may not have what it takes to last all year.

Bring Playoffs to College Football

Posted by Bill Ripken on Monday, December 7th, 2009

In every major sport, there are playoffs. In every college equivalent, there are playoffs – that is of course, except Division 1A football.

We have March Madness in basketball, a College World Series in baseball, and playoffs in every other sport but football. And after last weekend, that reality has assured that a cloud of doubt will be hanging over whichever team takes home this year’s national title.

There are five undefeated teams remaining at the Div. 1A level after last weekend’s games. Alabama will play Texas in the Citi National Championship Game – one of them will finally suffer a loss and the other will remain perfect. The Fiesta Bowl will also feature two undefeated teams, with TCU playing Boise State. And finally, Cincinnati pits it’s flawless record up against Florida in the Sugar Bowl.

In the end, there’s a possibility we’ll come out of the BCS with three teams, all undefeated, and all with a legitimate claim that they deserve national title recognition.

Now, I understand the constant debate over strength of schedule and the challenges faced by teams who play in the more powerful conferences. But the system in place seems far too archaic and flawed, with computers and coaches and everyone else having a say in who plays for the championship.

In every other sport, the champion is the last team standing, the only team left at the end, and the only team to win the last game of its season. That’s how it was for the Yankees last month and that’s how it was for the Steelers in Super Bowl XLIII. They capped their seasons off with a victory and rightfully earned their championship claim. All the doubters had to put-up and shut-up.

With the current BCS system, all the “what-if’s” remain. I want to see the national champion decided on the field, where the game is played – when that happens all the what-if’s go away, the endless talk stops and we all move on. All the second-rate teams get dismissed, and there is no doubt who deserves the title.

It’s time for college football to adopt a playoff system. This year, there might be a general consensus on the eight best teams, and with a playoff system, you’ll always end up with that ninth team whining that they belong – but to me, that is much better than dealing with the insufferable debate between multiple undefeated teams, all with legitimate claims on the national title.

Winter Meetings – O’s Goals

Posted by Bill Ripken on Saturday, December 5th, 2009

Lexington Market in Snow (2006) by Danielle Blue via FlickrSome light snow in Baltimore today, so it seems fitting to talk about MLB’s Winter Meetings and what exactly the Orioles might be looking to accomplish in Indianapolis next week.

One thing we know – the O’s have a very talented core of young athletes. I fully expect Wieters to emerge in 2010 as the superstar he really is, and there’s a lot of hype around Josh Bell, the third baseman that came over in the George Sherrill trade with the Dodgers.

But an offense with the likes of Wieters and Josh Bell will only succeed if the O’s pitching can find a way to slow the other team down. Baltimore’s farm system has provided the Orioles with some fantastic arms to accomplish this: Brian Matusz and Chris Tillman to name a couple.

With an arsenal of young arms, the O’s may be heading into the Winter Meetings with the likes of a seasoned vet in their cross-hairs – someone just like free agent John Lackey.

Bringing in an older starter who has already earned respect around the league can be an asset to a team of young arms. Beyond putting more W’s on the stat sheet, a guy like John Lackey can function as a mentor in the clubhouse, helping craft pitchers like Tillman and Matusz into great starters for years to come.

It’s similar to the rumors that were hovering around John Smoltz and the Washington Nationals. Now that the Nationals have Stephen Strasburg – the world’s no-doubt #1 prospect – a guy like Smoltz could share a lot of his wisdom with such a young pitcher.

Not every 150-game winner makes a great mentor. It takes a special breed. Ron Washington has given Kevin Milwood a lot of credit in Texas. Adam Wainwright has often mentioned the way Chris Carpenter has helped him improve. AJ Burnett frequently credits Doc Halladay with helping him find success in the big show.

Specific to the Orioles, just look back to a guy like Ben McDonald – he helped Mike Mussina develop into a first-rate starter.

There’s no doubt some big news will come out of this year’s Winter Meetings, but we’ll just have to wait and see what the Orioles get out of it. Lackey is out there for the taking, it may just require too much to get him. That said, there’s no doubt in my mind the Orioles could use a vet like him to help guide these rookies and this organization out of the bottom of the AL East.