Scott Boras, Super Agent

Posted by Bill Ripken on Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

Think what you want of Scott Boras, but he gets his job done. Better than anyone else in his industry.

He always gets top-dollar for his clients, and in the case of Matt Holliday’s recent signing with the St. Louis Cardinals, Boras has elevated his status to another level.

Not only did Holliday’s contract blow away Jason Bay’s—who you could argue is the better player of the two biggest free agent outfielders of this off-season—but in the end, Holliday finds himself in a much better situation than Bay.

Bay is certainly getting paid, having signed a $66 million, four-year deal with the Mets. While he’s getting close to top-dollar, he’s also now playing for a team that lost 92 games in 2009.

Over in St. Louis, Boras landed Holliday a seven-year deal for $120 million with the Cards, a team that typically doesn’t delve deep into its pockets for free agents.

In the end, both Bay and Holliday will be making comparable money on a yearly basis: Bay at about $16.5 million per year, Holliday at about $17 million per year.

Boras’ super agent ability is what makes the real difference though. Bay will be playing for a struggling franchise trying to rebound from a dismal season, while Holliday finds himself returning to a team that just came off a playoff run and has a very good chance to return to the playoffs in 2010. Not to mention the fact that Holliday finds himself in the same lineup as Albert Pujols, and the reality that St. Louis is a much more relaxed playing atmosphere than New York.

Who has the better chance of bringing home a World Series Championship during the life of their new contract? That’s a no-brainer.

Looking beyond fiscal numbers, there’s no doubt Boras got Holliday the best deal possible.

We all know Boras always seeks top-dollar for his clients, regardless of where that money comes from. But with the Holliday deal, Boras has achieved perfection. He placed his client in the best possible atmosphere and earned him the biggest paycheck, and that’s never easy when you’re looking for top-dollar in the major leagues.

The Evil Empire – At It Again

Posted by Bill Ripken on Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

The Evil Empire is at it again.

By acquiring Curtis Granderson and now Javier Vazquez, the Yankees have secured their spot atop the AL East going into 2010 and are now the odds-on favorites to go all the way back to the World Series. And I wouldn’t bet against them winning it all again.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I can’t think of a single time in the history of the game that a World Series Champion went into the off-season after winning the title and then acquired a 30-homer guy like Granderson. Playing in New York is a very different atmosphere, and Granderson can be streaky, but if you don’t think he’s going to hit another 30 at that softball field they’ve built in the Bronx, then you’re kidding yourself. The Yanks have taken an already potent offense, and made it even stronger.

And that offense takes a lot of pressure off the starting rotation, which now has Javier Vazquez filling in the four spot. This is a guy who placed fourth in the voting for the NL Cy Young this year, and he’s going to be penciled in at the back-end of the Yankee rotation. Vazquez won’t post a 2.8 ERA against the lineups he’ll be facing in the AL East, but he won’t need to with that Yankee offense behind him.

By adding both Granderson and Vazquez, the Yanks have no doubt increased the chances of polishing off their 2010 season with another parade through the Canyon of Heroes.

And who’s to say they’re done? Left field is still wide open for the Yanks, and I don’t really think that Damon is in the mix. Will they give Gardner a chance to play every day out there, or will the Yankees delve deeper into their wallets for someone like Jason Bay or Matt Holliday – the two biggest free agents still on the market.

I’ve heard the cost to acquire one of those sluggers may be too high, even for the Empire. But I don’t know if I believe that, simply because no one has ever been too expensive for the Yankees.

Wolf Deal a Warning

Posted by Bill Ripken on Friday, December 11th, 2009

With the Winter Meetings concluded, a lot of the big-name free agents still remain on the market. Not Randy Wolf though, and I think he deserves a lot of credit for how he handled his free agency.

Randy didn’t let his eyes wander around the league, looking at all the other deals being made or discussed. He knew what he wanted, he found a situation and an offer that fit him well, and he jumped on it. Good for him. There aren’t many guys around anymore who will go into free agency and accept the first fair deal that comes their way. No, they’ll test the waters and wait for some team to hurl up an enormous offer.

Raul Ibanez made a very similar deal last year. The Phillies made him a fair offer coming out of the ’08 Winter Meetings. Ibanez took it and he went out and played quality baseball for a great team.

Take a fair deal and go play your game.

The Wolf deal should serve as a heads up to the remaining free agents, an example they should consider following. Don’t get too greedy, don’t worry about anyone else in the league, and don’t wait around for the absolute perfect deal. That’s not to say the $30 million that Wolf is going to get over the next three years is anything to shake a stick at, but many guys in his position might have turned down the Brewers’ offer in favor of finding an even better deal – something that may never have come along.

It was a two-way street. The Brewers didn’t step beyond their means. Instead, they stayed within themselves and filled their need for a quality left-handed starter, and they accomplished that goal early-on in the off-season.

My advice to the remaining free agents – worry about yourself, ignore all the other deals being made and just look for one that fits you. You don’t need a blockbuster deal to find your place on the diamond.

Millwood Arrives

Posted by Bill Ripken on Thursday, December 10th, 2009

As the Winter Meetings were winding down, the Orioles managed to take a step in the right direction by landing veteran right-hander Kevin Millwood.

I wrote over the weekend about the need for the Orioles to acquire a seasoned starter in order to bring some guidance to a roster laden with young, promising arms. A guy like Millwood can bring just that type of balance to their rotation, along with the endurance to carry 200 innings while posting a sub-3.70 ERA.

He’ll be the Orioles’ ace come the season’s start, and my bet is he’ll do well all season long. Similar to his move to Texas, a change like this could help Millwood put up some solid numbers. He has the winning attitude that every number one starter should, and he also possesses the ability to go deep into games even when he doesn’t have his best stuff. With those skills, Millwood will set a great example for the younger guys.

Plus, a guy like Millwood can go out every 5th day and keep the Orioles in the game. His arrival pushes the younger arms deeper into the rotation, where they’ll find a more natural fit and have a lot of pressure lifted.

Acquiring Millwood could also open up some more doors for making moves before spring training starts. Now that the pitching rotation has found more stability, the Orioles can consider making some riskier moves that have a high upside, moves they may not have considered before.

Take a guy like Erik Bedard, I’ll use him as an example because he played for the Orioles as recently as 2007 before going to Seattle. Before the Millwood acquisition, the Orioles didn’t have a lot of room to risk picking up a hurler like Bedard. While Bedard’s stuff on the mound has never been questioned; there’s always been some worry about his durability at the major league level.

Now that the Orioles have Millwood in the rotation, they can be more comfortable taking a risk on a guy like Bedard, someone who can throw electric stuff but may or may not have what it takes to last all year.

Bring Playoffs to College Football

Posted by Bill Ripken on Monday, December 7th, 2009

In every major sport, there are playoffs. In every college equivalent, there are playoffs – that is of course, except Division 1A football.

We have March Madness in basketball, a College World Series in baseball, and playoffs in every other sport but football. And after last weekend, that reality has assured that a cloud of doubt will be hanging over whichever team takes home this year’s national title.

There are five undefeated teams remaining at the Div. 1A level after last weekend’s games. Alabama will play Texas in the Citi National Championship Game – one of them will finally suffer a loss and the other will remain perfect. The Fiesta Bowl will also feature two undefeated teams, with TCU playing Boise State. And finally, Cincinnati pits it’s flawless record up against Florida in the Sugar Bowl.

In the end, there’s a possibility we’ll come out of the BCS with three teams, all undefeated, and all with a legitimate claim that they deserve national title recognition.

Now, I understand the constant debate over strength of schedule and the challenges faced by teams who play in the more powerful conferences. But the system in place seems far too archaic and flawed, with computers and coaches and everyone else having a say in who plays for the championship.

In every other sport, the champion is the last team standing, the only team left at the end, and the only team to win the last game of its season. That’s how it was for the Yankees last month and that’s how it was for the Steelers in Super Bowl XLIII. They capped their seasons off with a victory and rightfully earned their championship claim. All the doubters had to put-up and shut-up.

With the current BCS system, all the “what-if’s” remain. I want to see the national champion decided on the field, where the game is played – when that happens all the what-if’s go away, the endless talk stops and we all move on. All the second-rate teams get dismissed, and there is no doubt who deserves the title.

It’s time for college football to adopt a playoff system. This year, there might be a general consensus on the eight best teams, and with a playoff system, you’ll always end up with that ninth team whining that they belong – but to me, that is much better than dealing with the insufferable debate between multiple undefeated teams, all with legitimate claims on the national title.

Winter Meetings – O’s Goals

Posted by Bill Ripken on Saturday, December 5th, 2009

Lexington Market in Snow (2006) by Danielle Blue via FlickrSome light snow in Baltimore today, so it seems fitting to talk about MLB’s Winter Meetings and what exactly the Orioles might be looking to accomplish in Indianapolis next week.

One thing we know – the O’s have a very talented core of young athletes. I fully expect Wieters to emerge in 2010 as the superstar he really is, and there’s a lot of hype around Josh Bell, the third baseman that came over in the George Sherrill trade with the Dodgers.

But an offense with the likes of Wieters and Josh Bell will only succeed if the O’s pitching can find a way to slow the other team down. Baltimore’s farm system has provided the Orioles with some fantastic arms to accomplish this: Brian Matusz and Chris Tillman to name a couple.

With an arsenal of young arms, the O’s may be heading into the Winter Meetings with the likes of a seasoned vet in their cross-hairs – someone just like free agent John Lackey.

Bringing in an older starter who has already earned respect around the league can be an asset to a team of young arms. Beyond putting more W’s on the stat sheet, a guy like John Lackey can function as a mentor in the clubhouse, helping craft pitchers like Tillman and Matusz into great starters for years to come.

It’s similar to the rumors that were hovering around John Smoltz and the Washington Nationals. Now that the Nationals have Stephen Strasburg – the world’s no-doubt #1 prospect – a guy like Smoltz could share a lot of his wisdom with such a young pitcher.

Not every 150-game winner makes a great mentor. It takes a special breed. Ron Washington has given Kevin Milwood a lot of credit in Texas. Adam Wainwright has often mentioned the way Chris Carpenter has helped him improve. AJ Burnett frequently credits Doc Halladay with helping him find success in the big show.

Specific to the Orioles, just look back to a guy like Ben McDonald – he helped Mike Mussina develop into a first-rate starter.

There’s no doubt some big news will come out of this year’s Winter Meetings, but we’ll just have to wait and see what the Orioles get out of it. Lackey is out there for the taking, it may just require too much to get him. That said, there’s no doubt in my mind the Orioles could use a vet like him to help guide these rookies and this organization out of the bottom of the AL East.

No Minors Necessary

Posted by Bill Ripken on Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

Nationals Logo via mnapoleon on FlickrLess than an hour’s drive from here, you’ll find the new home of Nationals’ top prospect, Stephen Strasburg. He’s been the talk of the town since he was the draft’s number one overall pick this past June. Hell, this kid was the number one overall on the entire planet. Then, the young righty was surrounded by speculation as the Nationals worked out a deal that would satisfy the young player’s veteran agent, Scott Boras.

Even though the Nats have secured the fire-baller with a record deal, the team’s general manager, Mike Rizzo, is heading into the winter meetings with his eyes on acquiring even more quality arms.

With all the hype surrounding Strasburg, I think the Nats are in a very unique position. Strasburg is the caliber of pitcher that they don’t need to baby him around in the minors, fretting over when he’ll be ready to come up to the big show.

Pitchers at the Major League level are paid to win games. It’s as simple as that, and I think Strasburg is ready to win some games for the Nats. While I understand the desire to ease guys into the bigs, I don’t like to see unwritten rules that bar a guy from coming up until he passes some arbitrary deadline.

Come the end of spring training, Rizzo will look at his lineup of pitchers and he’ll have to decide the 11-or-so hurlers he wants to start the season with. I’m willing to bet that Strasburg is well within that top-11, and I think that earns him the right to skip the minors and get right to business earning his monster salary.

Rizzo will have to determine if Strasburg has the right make-up and a strong enough mentality to perform at the highest level and really help his club out. But I really think Strasburg already shows signs of having what it takes.

Does he give the Nats a better chance to win? I’d say so, and I don’t see any need to have an arm of that quality just biding time in the minors.

Hall of Fame Voting

Posted by Bill Ripken on Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Hall of Fame via Ken Curtis on FlickrWith the recent announcement of the candidates for next year’s Hall of Fame ballot, I want to talk integrity – and I’m not talking about the players.

In their first year of eligibility, Robbie Alomar and Barry Larkin deserve to get in, no problem. But that takes me to the voters. This is the time and the class of prospects where you’ll hear the nagging terminology, “He’s a Hall of Famer for sure, but not on the first ballot.”

Excuse me? In my world, you’re a Hall of Famer or you’re not. I don’t care about the number of ballots it takes. If you think a guy deserves to be in the Hall, vote that way. That’s why it bothers me to no end when voters refuse to vote for a deserving candidate in their first year of eligibility. “I won’t vote because I don’t want it to be unanimous,” they’ll say. “Not in his first year, I’ll vote for him on his second ballot.”

For those on the Baseball Writer’s Association of America who think in those terms, your right to vote should be revoked. The ballot asks a simple question, are these players Hall of Famers or not? By voting no one year and yes the next, you’re trying to make a statement to get your own name in the paper, and you’re not doing your job as a voter. You’re destroying the integrity of the Hall itself while trying to preserve the integrity of your own irrelevant grading system.

It’s at the heart of the game itself: call it like you see it. Is it a hit or an error? Does he belong in the Hall or not? I despise hypocritical voters for the same reason I can’t stand it when people complain that a close play should go as a hit just because the batter happens to play for the home team. Or when the scorekeeper marks a borderline hit as an error, just because the pitcher has a perfect game through six innings – then he makes a change in the books afterward when that pitcher gives up an undeniable hit in the seventh. It lacks integrity and it’s despicable.

To the voters on the BBWAA: it is what it is. Is he a Hall of Famer or not? After all, once a player gets in, everyone will remember him as a Hall of Famer, while you’re still stuck on how many ballots it took.

Jeter – Sportsman of the Year

Posted by Bill Ripken on Monday, November 30th, 2009

Derek JeterIn the past, Derek Jeter has given Cal a lot of credit for paving the way for a much bigger generation of shortstops, creating the baseball setting in which Jeter now thrives. Perhaps I’m biased towards my brother, but Junior always seemed to do everything right–on the field and off–and Jeter exemplifies that same greatness of character. He plays hard every day, and is just as impressive a person outside the foul lines as he is an athlete between them.

Coaching at the World Baseball Classic this year, it was the first chance I had to spend any significant time with the Yankee shortstop. In that setting, he didn’t disappoint. He put forth the effort day in and day out, treated everyone with the utmost respect, and always maintained a professional manner.

Now he’s got a ring on five of his fingers—the epitome of a superstar—but you wouldn’t guess it by his attitude and workhorse mentality. Over the course of my career, I’ve met plenty of other “superstars,” and many of them would be better compared to a horse’s rear-end, if you ask me.

It’s no wonder he goes by Captain at one of the most storied franchises in history. There’s no doubt Jeter is the leader of the Yankees.

Greatest Yankee of all time? That will always be up for debate.

But Sportsman of the Year? No doubt Jeter deserves it, he’s been doing the same great stuff since he first came to the big show.

I can only ask Sports Illustrated, “What took you so damn long?”

Hunting for a Bird

Posted by Bill Ripken on Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

112509-Halladay_Keith_AllisonWe’re all looking forward to a lot of eating, some moderate drinking, watching football and napping the afternoon away on the couch tomorrow.

At least that’s how everyone pictures Turkey Day.

But my guess is you won’t see a guy like Theo Epstein all tryptophan-ed out on the couch tomorrow. With the Red Sox being dismissed by the Angels in the first round of the playoffs this year—by way of the sweep no less—and the Doc Halladay rumors buzzing, you just might find Epstein down in Odessa, FL, carving a bird with the Jays’ top righty.

As Doug Miller points out on MLB.com today, Epstein and the Red Sox have already inked deals around the Thanksgiving holiday with a couple of aces. He sat down to dinner with Curt Schilling in 2003, and then the Sox obtained both Josh Beckett and Mike Lowell in a Turkey Day deal in 2005.

The Sox GM married in 2007, so he may have some trouble getting away from the in-laws this time around. But you may just wake up on Black Friday and discover Walmart isn’t the only place making deals and doing business on a big scale. You may just find one of baseball’s best has become the newest member of the Nation.