Archive for February, 2010

The Beatles’ Urgent Request For Use of Stockhausen’s Mug

Posted by Brian on Saturday, February 27th, 2010

telegram_epstein
It took a little while for the Beatles to make contact with Karlheinz Stockhausen regarding his cameo on the cover of Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. Although they definitely tried to dot all their i’s and cross their t’s—legally speaking—maybe they should have checked their spelling. The Dirty Projectors have indie rock’s most highly educated backup band. Cyclists in Los Angeles ride for new music. Modern composers’ brains are more developed than yours. Christoph Eschenbach calls the Philadelphia Orchestra management a bunch of incompetent liars. And we contemplate what the musical theme of the 2012 Olympics should be. Now read this: your weekly starred items.

• Karlheinz Stockhausen was probably never more visible to the general public than from his cameo on the cover of the Beatles’ Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band album—his post-9-11 remarks notwithstanding. But he seemed to be a hard guy to get a hold of. Archived on the official Stockhausen website are several bits of correspondence between the Beatles and Herr Stockhausen, including a very formal initial request for the use of his likeness and a much more urgent telegram after his failure to reply. What if Stockhausen didn’t reply? Would that have altered the history of rock and roll? [Unquiet Thoughts]

• David Longstreth and his band Dirty Projectors got classy at the Allen Room courtesy of Lincoln Center’s American Songbook series, which presented the DP’s pseudo-contemporary-indie chamber opera last week with support form the conservatory-trained pit band Alarm Will Sound. Does this make Alarm Will Sound more indie than the NOW Ensemble? [NY Times]

• The Los Angeles-based new music series Monday Evening Concerts mounted a performance of Mauricio Kagel’s Eine Brise for 111 cyclists. Though LA Times critic Mark Swed didn’t think it was much for the ears—and surely he meant an Alpe d’Huez ascent—you gotta give props to the series for organizing over 100 cyclists without the promise of $20 cash premes and podium girls. [Culture Monster]

• In his new book The Music Instinct, author Philip Ball draws on the latest neuroscience research to explain why most people seem to hate modern classical music. The reason? They’re not smart enough. Well, sort of. It’s more that the brain finds patterns enjoyable, and modern classical music makes the brain have to work too hard. The most disturbing finding of this research: tone sequences in music by Schoenberg and Webern were LESS PREDICTABLE than random tone sequences. So much for logic and order. [Telegraph]

• In an interview with the German publication Die Welt, it appears that former Philadelphia Orchestra conductor Christoph Eschenbach forgot one or both of these two things: 1) that some English speakers—even Americans—can speak/understand German, and 2) they invented this thing called an online translator. Had he remembered either of those two things, he might have given a little more thought to publically calling out the Philadelphia Orchestra management as “incompetent” people who “lie” and whose mismanagement directly led to the orchestra’s current economic situation. [fig 1.] The moral of the story here is to check yourself before you unexpect yourself. [Adaptistration]

• The 2010 Winter Olympics may be coming to an end this weekend, but that just means you can start thinking about the 2012 games. Charlotte Higgins is taking a survey about what the musical theme of the next summer games should be. “London Calling” by The Clash? [Guardian]

Figure 1.
eschenbach

Pull Quote: Philip Ball —

Posted by Brian on Thursday, February 25th, 2010

pullquote-philipball
author of The Music Instinct, defending the music of Arnold Schoenberg.

Improvisation and Fabrication

Posted by Brian on Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

aebersoldAs an undergraduate music student, I had the great honor of studying with the legendary saxophonist Yusef Lateef for a time. Yusef’s on another level in terms of the thought process and execution of improvised music. Notice that I said “improvised music” rather than jazz or bebop. (His own term for the kind of music he plays is autophysiopsychic music, meaning music which comes from one’s physical, mental, and spiritual self. Read all about it here.)

Yusef’s got an incredible wealth of knowledge, but is extremely picky about terminology. Jazz, he contends, is a deragatory term derived from a colloquialism for the male ejaculate. And he professes to not know what bebop or any other stylistic label is or sounds like. If you go to Yusef and want to learn to play bebop, you should tell him that you’d like to learn to play in the style of Charlie Parker or Cannonball Adderley, and so on. Once you get on the same page w/r/t terminology you’ll be fine.

For Yusef, improvisation is complete and utter spontaneity. If you begin playing with preconceived ideas or parameters of any sort, you are not truly improvising. As I got deeper into my studies with Yusef, I said to him that it seems as though the more you learn—the more licks you play in twelve keys, the more vocabulary you internalize, the more tunes you know, the more scales and patterns and patterns and patterns you drill, the more great artists you transcribe and learn to perfect their every nuance—the harder it becomes to truly improvise. His response was simply, “You understand.”

I’ve always wrestled with that issue as an improviser and to know that it was something that concerned even a great master made me feel better. When I play an improvised solo in a jazz style, I often feel as though I am putting everyone on. Like it’s not really “improvised” because I’ve practiced so hard to be able to make all the changes in a stylistically correct and hopefully somewhat hip way. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t feel this way when I hear other jazz players improvise. To the contrary, I even find it exciting to listen to the best Brecker clone even if I know every single lick that he/she is ripping off. I just could never find my voice as a jazz artist the way I feel as though I’ve found it as an interpreter of composed music.

Yet for the past couple of years, I’ve been improvising in a non-jazz style. (I’ll be doing it at tonight’s Mobtown Modern show.) This type of playing suits me. It allows me to draw on a sonic vocabulary that is not constrained by the parameters of style. I play what I hear. It’s exhilarating, refreshing, and utterly freeing. And it’s more along the lines of what I was searching for when I studied with Yusef.

An aside: Here’s a funny story Yusef once told me in a lesson. One day he was walking down a street in New York City when who should happen to be approaching him but Sun Ra. They were friends and so Yusef said, “Hey man, what’s going on?” Sun Ra replied, “I just got back from Venus, man.” The look in Yusef’s eye was priceless as he told me this. He thought clearly that Sun Ra must be nuts but he decided to humor him. “Oh yeah, man. Well, what was going on there,” he replied, laughing as he recalled the encounter. Now some people might think Yusef is on a different planet but his reaction to Sun Ra’s statement that he’d just returned from some interplanetary travel proves that his feet are planted firmly on the planet Earth.

Game Time: A Cheat Sheet for John Zorn’s “Cobra”

Posted by Brian on Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Runner
Tomorrow night (Wednesday) at the Metro Gallery, the Contemporary Museum’s Mobtown Modern music series will present a performance of John Zorn’s infamous game piece Cobra. Unlike a lot of the music Mobtown Modern presents, there’s no actual written score for Cobra—the players in the ensemble improvise all the musical material. However, far from being an improvisational free-for-all, the improvisations (or ‘cobras’) are shaped and guided by a strict and elaborate set of rules. Here they are:

cobra-score-border

I’m going to assume that unless you’ve been involved in a performance of the piece before, that the “score” for Cobra you see above makes absolutely no sense. No worries. As a matter of fact, we (the ensemble and yours truly) spent a good amount of time in our early rehearsals just familiarizing ourselves with the rules, clarifying them, and actually creating exercises that would help us translate them into sound. Before getting into the details of each command though, let’s take a quick look at how a performance of Cobra is actually run.

When you really get down to it, the rules of engagement that Zorn lays out for Cobra are basically a set of parameters that allow the musicians to shape their improvisation. Of course, choosing parameters before starting a free improvisation is nothing unique to Cobra; it’s a common improvisational strategy that allows the musicians to focus their performance a bit. What is unique to Cobra, however, is that these parameters, or rules, aren’t chosen by the musicians, but rather dictated to the musicians by a single leader, or “prompter.” The individual chosen as the prompter brandishes different cue cards, each containing one of the commands, and then gives a downbeat, which signifies the beginning of whichever command is on the card. By doing this, the prompter can exert almost complete control over the formal outcome of the improvisation. (N.B. Remember, there is no music written down; it’s all improvised.)

Sounds easy enough, right? Well, it actually gets a little more complicated fun. Though the prompter has the final say in what command is put into play, the musicians in the group have the ability to make suggestions to the prompter about which cue card should be used next. If you look back at the “score,” you’ll notice that each set of cards is identified not only by color, but also by a part of the body as well as a number. Here’s an example:

yellow-one
One finger to the mouth doesn’t mean to keep the noise down, it means that the guy who should probably comb his hair is suggesting that the prompter call the “Pool” card. What’s that? Well, rather than make this a completely epic post by explaining each command in this space, why not take a gander at the annotated photo set over at Mobtown Modern’s Flickr account, where you’ll find pictures of each one of the cards along with explanations about what they mean. And, of course, to see them in action be sure to stop by the Metro Gallery tomorrow night at 8pm!

Update: Click here to listen to yours truly and Contemporary Museum Executive Director Irene Hofmann talking with Tom Hall on Maryland Morning with Sheilah Kast about tomorrow’s performance of Cobra.

The Contemporary Museum’s Mobtown Modern Music Series presents John Zorn’s COBRA this Wednesday (February 24) at 8 p.m. at the Metro Gallery (1700 N. Charles Street). Tickets are $10 general admission and $5 for Contemporary Museum members and students with a valid ID.

WTF is that Noise?!

Posted by Brian on Monday, February 22nd, 2010

plugging ears
If you’ve attended any sort of new or experimental music performance, there’s a chance you may have heard some of the instruments making some pretty unorthodox sounds. Weird sounds, or extended techniques as they’re called, are not all that new music is made up of (thankfully), but they’re sometimes a part of the new musical soundscape. Here’s a short historical primer on these less conventional sounds.

Extended techniques, as the name implies, requires the performer to play their instrument in a manner outside of what would be considered a traditionally established norm—”extending” the instrument’s traditional sound-making capabilities, so to speak. These techniques include multiphonics, circular breathing, quarter-tones, slap-tonguing, key clicks, muting, playing with the mouthpiece alone, tapping on the instrument’s body, all manners of bowing, and playing on the inside of the piano, to name just a few. Extended techniques as we know them today first appeared in concert music in the early twentieth century–Henry Cowell’s Tides of Manaunaun (1915), Mosolov’s Iron Foundry (1928), Varese’s Ionisation (1929-31)–but experienced a true renaissance in the 1960s.

Because of the growing world of electronic music during the 1960s, composers were now confronted with the task of finding a way to bridge the gap between the seemingly disparate electronic and acoustic sound worlds. Extended techniques provided that link. While the exploration of extended techniques in new music was widespread, many people point to the publication of the Italian theorist/composer Bruno Bartolozzi’s New Sounds for Woodwind in the late 1960s as a codification of these efforts.

Extended techniques offer a way for a performer to personalize their instrument and draw out its unique qualities, and in the process develop a very unique stylistic approach and sonic vocabulary. In concert music, these techniques more or less ran their course in the 1960s and 1970s, with the most advances and interesting work with them being done in the 1990s not by composers, but free improvisers and electronic musicians. As a result, extended techniques have become an integral part of each instrument’s identity and are no longer an “other” in instrumental technique.

Over the next couple of weeks I’ll be sprinkling in some posts dedicated to particular extended techniques to help familiarize the less familiar with some of these sounds. However, if you’re looking for some immediate gratification in the form of a sonic crash course, might I suggest attending Mobtown Modern‘s performance of John Zorn’s Cobra this Wednesday evening at 8 p.m. at The Metro Gallery.

Pull Quote: Proper Discord —

Posted by Brian on Sunday, February 21st, 2010

pullquote-propercrap
offerering suggestions on how to improve the symphony experience for audience members.

Do Classical Music Lovers Have to Be Old and Staid?

Posted by Brian on Friday, February 19th, 2010

craigslist-crop1

How about a little levity this Friday?

So as we know, people who like classical music are sometimes often characterized as stuffy, prim, and old. However, the internet reminds us that that isn’t necessarily the case. You sure find some interesting things when you type ‘classical music’ into a generic Craigslist search . . .

**

Classical music lover with a wild soul – 49
Date: 2010-02-04, 8:43AM EST

Where and why is it written that classical music lovers have to be old and staid?

Looking for a classical music lover (who might or might not be a submissive) under 40, who likes to smoke (weed sometimes, tobacco OK too), drink, roll, and fuck, quite apart from exploring musical byways.

I’m late 40s (tall, nice-looking, hazel eyes, funny, successful, and all that crap) so you should enjoy the idea of doing all this with an older man, too. (Sorry if that fact rules you out; please think twice.)

If you’re a non-SPAM replier (bless your socks) use the subject line “Needle in a haystack.” Thanks.

**

Click here for the full ad (and to see that I’m not making this up).

Lady Gaga Mines Bach’s Catalog to Write Her Hits

Posted by Brian on Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

ladygaga-bachbust2

In advance of Lady Gaga’s appearance on Good Morning America last Wednesday, George Stephanopoulos issued a call for questions:

twitter-gaga-stephanopoulous

To which Shia Kapos, a lifestyle reporter/blogger for Crain’s Chicago Business, responded:

twitter-gaga-shiakapos

Then Kristine Farra (N.B. I don’t know these people) replied to Shia Kapos’s reply to @GStephanopoulos and also made an interesting pronouncement about classical music:

twitter-gaga3-2

I wasn’t really sure how @KristineFarra made the jump from Gaga to classical music, but it appears to be widespread public knowledge that Gaga took some classical piano lessons and may or may not be an actual classically-trained pianist. I Googled that.

gaga-google

Which ultimately led me to this article from the FemaleFirst website which talks about how Lady Gaga hated her real name. After she tells you why she despises her real name—she was “fed up with people yelling about 800 names at me every day”—she talks about the impact classical music had on her. There’s also this pullquote:

gaga-quote

WHOAWHOAWHOA there, classical music cognoscenti! Before you go all ganging up on Gaga for her “grossly misguided statement” about the relationship between popular music and grand master Bach, consider for a moment that she’s digging on Bach and taking something away from it. Just cuz there are no free counterpoint or false expositions in “Just Dance”—or that she might not be able to composer a bona fide fugue—doesn’t diminish the fact that it’s some kind of source of inspiration. That’s cool. Hey, I’ve heard that a lot of new music composers these days are maybe like using their pop music influences in their music. I don’t hear Lady Gaga or Ke$ha bitching at you.

But let’s get back to @KristineFarra’s decree that classical music only gets u success after death. I know that there are some people in the classical music field who actually believe this. It’s a way for them to reconcile the fact that nobody pays attention to their music now—well, they’d tell you that it’s “overlooked.” It’s a delusion that promises them fame in the afterlife when some musicologist in the future tries desperately to find a composer from the past nobody has ever heard of so he/she can publish an article in some journal only other musicologists read in order to display their prowess in the library stacks. Then, based on this innovative research discovery, there will be renewed interest in this composer’s music. More scholarly articles will be published. People will discuss performance practices related to this composer’s music. Their obscure duet for flute and bassoon will enter both instruments’ standard repertory and be included in countless doctoral music students’ annotated bibliography dissertation projects. There will be festivals of their music. One of their melodies will inspire a composition student to compose a “Variations on a Theme by…” piece that will be performed exactly once on their university composers’ forum concert. But none of this will matter to the composer whose music all this fuss is over because they will be DEAD! Hey, whatever keeps ya going.

But now onto the second part of Ms. Farra’s tweetcree:

Talent + uniqueness + marketing = now.

That’s an equation I assume she was applying to Gaga’s supposed background as a classically-trained pianist, which she supposedly ditched to be a famous pop star now. There’s no reason that equation needs to follow logically from the I-won’t-make-it-in-classical-music-until-I’m-dead-and-gone-so-I’ll-become-a-pop-star train of logic. No, I think that equation can be applied just as well to someone who wants to try and make an impact in classical/new music. More and more folks in the industry are starting to get the hang of that. Is anything wrong with that or are we just becoming a bunch of sellouts?

Is New Music Saving Opera Or Scandalizing It?

Posted by Brian on Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

nico-mothertongue
Classical music is dying. (Or may already be dead; just depends on who you talk to.) And so is opera. At least that’s what some people would have you believe. Brendan Cooke, the General Director of the Baltimore Concert Opera, an organization that rose from the ashes of the Baltimore Opera Company, believes it’s dying and will be giving a presentation on that subject at the next Ignite Baltitmore. There was, however, an interesting comment on Brendan’s Ignite proposal from a user named “Figaro”:

Just because the Baltimore Opera went under doesn’t mean the artform is dying. Surely you saw all the press—both good and bad—about Luc Bondy’s staging of Tosca at the Met? To me, this demonstrates how much life there is in opera at the present time. Good work starting the BCO but I think the premise of your proposal—that opera is dying—is completely false. No other form of fine arts has generated the amount of discussion and buzz as opera right now; and people aren’t talking about it because they think it’s dying.

I would tend to agree with that statement. Wait a second. Who am I kidding? I wouldn’t tend to agree with that statement, I do agree with that statement. I also agree with the tenet that any press is good press. Q: What’s the best way to get a child to do something? A: Tell them they can’t. So the same-old, same-old productions aren’t going to generate a buzz like a cracked-out new production that takes some risks and exercises perhaps more than its fair share of artistic license. I don’t claim to know the ins and outs of what’s up in the opera world, but it seems to me that far from sounding opera’s death knell, risky productions are doing far more for the art form’s visibility than would be possible with a business-as-usual model. The only harm being done seems to be in the minds of purists, who want to preserve tradition even if that leads to opera’s demise. I mean, it’s not pissing the composers off. They’re dead, after all.

Enter the news last week that new-indie-alt-post-un-pop classical darling Nico Muhly, along with playwright Craig Lucas, was awarded the first joint Metropolitan Opera and Lincoln Center Theater commission. As news of this landmark commission rippled throughout the blogosphere—sorry, I’m making this dramatic cuz it’s about opera—it touched off a veritable shitstorm in the comments section of a post at operablogsite Parterre Box. Here’s a particularly intelligent, thoughtful, and articulate one:

fucknicomuhly1
Terrible, indeed. The comment, that is. Who writes shit like that?! Oh wait, anonymous people! But anyway, unlike Luc Bondy’s Tosca, some people bitchy anonymous commenters think this thing is scandalous already! (Again with the kid metaphor. Parent: “You’re not going to listen to that devil worship music! I won’t allow it!” And guess what’s on that kid’s iPod?) As you might expect, other commenters ganged up on schweigundtanze, which prompted him/her to clarify his/her position:

muhly-comment1
Uhhhhhh . . .

muhly-mayer1
For the record, I happen to be a big fan of Nico’s music. He’s one of a handful of young composers who’s actually doing what everyone has been talking about. Maybe I’ll even go out on an limb and call him the effing new music Jesus. I mean, you see the way he’s being crucified by some people, right? Maybe nowadays, when media is king, it’s good to have scandals around the operas themselves and not just in them?

nico-jesus1

[mouth image from the cover of Nico Muhly's Mothertongue album]

What Alanis Morrisette Can Teach Classical Musicians

Posted by Brian on Monday, February 15th, 2010

concert-crowdLast week’s post on Jay-Z and ostrich musicians reminded me of one of the many memorable conversations I had with my saxophone teacher when I was a graduate student at the University of Michigan. The conversation was one in which he recounted the amazing experience he’d had at an Alanis Morrisette concert that weekend. Let me explain why this is a little more noteworthy than it sounds so far: the dude was in his mid-60s. He and his wife went to the show because their son Blair was Alanis’s drummer at the time. I remember him telling me, with great enthusiam: “There were 60,000 people standing for 4 hours for this thing. And they couldn’t get enough. There’s something we can learn from that.

Now, Don Sinta is one progressive guy. For example, one of his solutions for getting more of the general public to attend concerts at the every-three-year saxophone geek-out known as the World Saxophone Congress was to invite Bill Clinton, Kenny G, and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (What? You didn’t know he was a sax player?!) to play Hook Trios together. Now that would seriously sell some tickets.

rockstar saxophonistGod only knows how blasphemous the saxophone cognoscenti would deem this proposal, despite the fact that Mr. Sinta is regarded as one of the godfathers of American “classical” saxophone playing. I can hear the hypothetical snide comments and quips in my head: “Well, that’s just cheapening our “serious” artform and undermining the decades of work we’ve done to legitimize our instrument. We simply won’t stand for this kind of pandering to the masses!” It’s that sort of closed-mindedness and elitist nonsense that continues to leave the saxophone marginalized and irrelevant. Any sort of niche artform needs a hook—please notice that I didn’t use the word ‘gimmick’; I think there’s a difference between the two—if it hopes to expand its’ audience and fan base.

Anyway, what Sinta was onto with his “there’s something we can learn from that” comment was that there were elements of the culture surrounding pop and rock music that we—’we’ meaning, musicians engaged in the creation and promotion of the music of our time—could harness to further our own cause. So the question is, do we need pyrotechnics, fog machines, spinning aerial drumset cages, and lasers at new music shows? Would that help sell the art? (I would personally enjoy having an LED curtain at Mobtown Modern shows, but that’s just me.)

As an aside, I’m wondering if Daniel Bernard Roumain had a similar conversation with Mr. Sinta about his Alanis concert experience because if he did, it seems like he might have taken some of that advice to heart:

alanis-dbr