Archive for March, 2010

Will Max/MSP Make Your Music More Meaningful?

Posted by Brian on Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

corey-twitter
The alliterative question du jour via composer Corey Dargel. I’ve used Max/MSP in the past, not as a composer but as a performer, and generally cringe when somebody tells me they’re going to use it for a piece. In my experience, it’s notoriously buggy, incompatible between different versions, and just a general Murphy’s Law-type pain in the ass that is rarely ever ‘plug-and-play’ easy to use. However, I’m not certain whether all that was the fault of the software or the fault of the composer. Because there have been pieces I’ve played with Max/MSP—I’m talking about Per Bloland’s work Quintet here—that have been fun and effective and easy to interface with. So what do y’all think of Max/MSP?

Do you use Max/MSP?
Have you had good experiences using Max/MSP?
Do you hate anything (or anyone) that uses Max/MSP?
What are some examples of good Max ‘patches’?
Does ‘MSP’ stand for ‘Might Shit the bed in Performance’?
Is Max/MSP a PC or a Mac?
Does Max/MSP make your music more ‘meaningful’?
Are you going to get ‘Max for Live‘?
Is ‘Max for Live’ better than ‘traditional’ Max/MSP?
Is interactive electroacoustic music the wave of the future?
Are you afraid that Max/MSP might get too intelligent and take over music?
In the case of a Max/MSP takeover, would you be on Max/MSP’s side or would you join the human resistance?

An Important Question For Adam Hopkins and the Out Of Your Head Collective Via My Twitter Account

Posted by Brian on Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

OOYH-twitter
YouTube Preview Image
Or maybe Kool-Aid man?
YouTube Preview Image
Inquiring minds want to know.

Playing Unfettered

Posted by Brian on Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

hgp-joe2
A lot has been written recently about the phenomenon of classical musicians performing in spaces usually reserved for indie rockers, folkies, and beer drinkers. And much of what’s said focuses on what it means for classical/new music that this is happening and what it might do for the music’s popularity among the younger set or folks who simply wouldn’t consider listening to the music otherwise. Part of the reason musicians are beginning to perform more and more in spaces like those is precisely because it takes a bit of the edge off of a musical genre that could sometimes use a drink or two to loosen itself up. At the same time, bringing new music into those venues hopefully communicates that it’s not just for jowly, cranky old men and turtlenecking professor types. And that’s good for business. However, in most of the discussions about playing in non-traditional concert spaces, what’s been missing has been the performer perspective, so I thought I’d offer my two cents.

For me, playing in “non-traditional” spaces is extremely liberating. The concert hall with all its protocol and convention (for both audience and performer) can be a little stifling, even when making an attempt to break from established norms. There’ve been times when my efforts to loosen up a stuffy recital atmosphere fell a little flat, not because I wasn’t incredibly charming, but rather because we’re programmed to behave certain ways in certain situations. The club setting, however, comes without the weight of those solemn rituals. And as a player, that’s often times been an extremely welcome change.

Playing a show in an alternative space doesn’t alter my approach—I still practice the same amount and bring the same integrity to the performance as I would if I was playing at Merkin Hall or Miller Theater, for example—but it does make me feel different, in a good way. It’s not that peoples’ expectations are lower, but the environment, to me, seems much more relaxed and inviting. I’m not a player who tends to get nervous before my shows, though there’s always that moment of anxiety immediately prior to going on stage. Yet when I play in non-concert hall spaces, I’ve yet to experience any trace of those feelings. Similarly, during the performance of a work in an alternative venue, I feel a lot less pressure. Suddenly, one missed note seems a lot less earth shattering. I’ve found that there’s a big benefit to being able to say, Whatever. . .” to yourself to add a little levity before and during any performance, no matter whether it’s a concerto solo in front of thousands of people, a recital when you know a reviewer is out in the crowd, or chamber piece with first class musicians.

It’s kind of a little mental trick because obviously I care deeply about whatever performance I’m giving, yet placing too much weight on it, I think, freezes a little of the freedom in performance that you might have, say, in just a rehearsal when nobody’s listening.

The Worst ‘Compliment’ You Can Hear After a ‘New Music’ Concert

Posted by Brian on Thursday, March 25th, 2010

That was interesting.

Guidelines For Inventing the Definitive Term For ‘New Music’

Posted by Brian on Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

genre-detectives
I started this blog off a little over a month ago with a post dedicated to the profusion of terms that have attempted to ‘define’ this music we’ve been calling ‘new music.’ Trying to ‘invent’ a new genre is not unique to ‘contemporary classical music.’ Carles, who authors the always brilliant Hipster Runoff blog, is also wondering “how genres of music r invented. It seems like there hasn’t really been a good genre name for the past 10 years before chillwave. Everything is ‘alternative _______’ or ‘indie ______.’” Indie-classical. Alt-classical. Wow, more and more similarities between streams are uncovered every day. It must be a sign that this marriage was meant to be?

Anyway, as ‘new music’ continues its endeavor to ‘define’ itself, now is a good time to remember some of the most important elements of genre naming (via Hipster Runoff):

  • Timeliness
  • Relevancy
  • Quality of Product / Artists / MP3s
  • Effectiveness/Utility of generalization
  • Stupid name that makes u giggle
  • Entry level music critics/regional publications that really ‘buy in’ to the name
  • A roster of artists who are actively touring and promoting their product

Okay, so who’s got some new names?
Maybe one term isn’t enough. Should ‘new music’ have sub-genres?
Who is the most indie indie-classical bandsemble?

Renaissance Composers Were Kinky Psychopaths

Posted by Brian on Monday, March 22nd, 2010

gesualdo-kinky1
Well, not all of them. But famed 16th century Italian prince-composer-murderer Carlo Gesualdo certainly seems to have been. (And I’m not talking about chromaticism, folks.) 10 reasons why bloggers are better than critics. What would a story about the nightmares induced by Brian Ferneyhough’s music sound like on This American Life? A look into the marching-band Shostakovich underground. Paying orchestras to play new music. Musicians in the Honolulu Symphony are not hanging loose. And an invitation to create a classical/new music viral video. We’ve got the votes for your weekly starred items.

• When we think of Renaissance music, we generally think of some very prim and buttoned-up stuff. However, a new book by Glenn Watkins about the Italian composer-prince Carlo Gesualdo, who is best known for his chromatic choral music (and oh, and murdering his wife), uncovers information that shows that he was a pretty psychotic and kinky dude. He ditched his first wife after accusing her of adultery though when he married for the second time, he got his freak on regularly. This culminated in the second wife accusing Gesualdo’s concubines of witchcraft. This quote from the testimony from the inquisition of the accused pretty much says it all: “That the aforementioned Aurelia made the prince drink her menstrual blood as a purgative is established by four witnesses to extrajudicial confessions by the defendant . . . Aurelia declared that the aforementioned Polisandra had told her that if she would take a slice of bread and place it inside her “nature” and after it was saturated with her own seed, she would give it to the prince to eat with sauce.” [Guardian]

• How does Proper Discord think bloggers are better than music critics? Let him count the ways; 10 of them. [Proper Discord]

• A small woman is about to perform Casandra’s Dream Song by Brian Ferneyhough. Before she begins she tells a story about how she had nightmares about the piece; it became known to her as Casandra’s Nightmare. For a time, she could only bear to deal with the music a line at a time and carried carved up bits of the score around with her every day. How would Ira Glass from This American Life have illuminated this story of solo musician, new music, difficulty, and fear? WWIGD? [Mind The Gap]

• Forget indie-classical, now we’ve got marching-band-classical. It’s become something of an underground cult thing for marching bands—as if marching bands weren’t cultish enough already—to play them some Shostakovich; the Scherzo from Symphony No. 10 seems to be particularly popular. [Unquiet Thoughts]

• Unhappy with the amount of contemporary music program by your local orchestra? Wanna change that? It’s apparently easy. All you have to do is call up your local orchestra, find out how much it costs them to put on a single concert, raise that amount of money, give them the money, and then enjoy the fruits of your labor (and the sneers of the grumpy orchestra members since you made them play an entire concert of new music). File under: taking the bull by the horns. [NewMusicBox]

• The musicians in the Honolulu Symphony are pissed. They presented a filing last week stating that “[based] on its history of gross mismanagement and incompetence . . . management is incapable of the task reorganization and a Chapter 11 trustee should be appointed, or, in the alternative, the case should be converted to Chapter 7 or dismissed.” You think they’re close with Christoph Eschenbach? [Adaptistration]

• New plan to save classical music: make a viral classical/new music video. This is your mission should you choose to accept it. [Mind The Gap]

Attention BSO: David T. Little Is a Screamer!

Posted by Brian on Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

davidtlittle
I first met composer David T. Little when we were students together at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. Tonight Marin Alsop and the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra will perform David’s piece Screamer! on a program that also includes works by John Corigliano and Sergei Prokofiev. I recently caught up with David and asked him about the piece, his thoughts on being a composer, what he’s been up to, and what’s with the middle initial. Here’s what he had to say.

Brian T. Sacawa: Marin Alsop is known as a great champion of new American music. How did you become acquainted with her?

David T. Little: I first became aware of Marin Alsop in around 2001 or so. I was at the University of Michigan at the time, and she suddenly seemed to be everywhere I looked. She was a huge champion of my teacher at the time, Michael Daugherty, so I knew about her in that way—I think we first met after the Detroit Symphony performed Daugherty’s percussion concerto, UFO, on a fun space-themed concert with Holst’s The Planets. I also remember around the same time having my mind totally blown by her recording of Christopher Rouse’s Gorgon, with the Colorado Symphony. I would later have the chance to work with her more directly at the Cabrillo Festival in Santa Cruz. This is where she first heard my piece Screamer! that the BSO will perform this week.

BTS: You studied with Michael Daugherty at the University of Michigan. Screamer! seems to display a lot of qualities that I’d call Daugherty-esque, for lack of a better term. What kind of influence has Michael had on your music?

DTL: Screamer! definitely comes out of my experiences at Michigan, but I think it has more to do with the department as a whole than with any one person. Michael was definitely an influence, but so was William Bolcom—with whom I studied while writing the piece, and to whom it is dedicated. Evan Chambers was also an influence, specifically this cool piece of his called Polka Nation. All three of these mentor composers gave me a kind of confidence that I had been struggling with at the time; a sense that anything was fair game, even circus music. I mean, it’s a pretty stupid thing to do, conventional wisdom tells us: to write an orchestra piece based on band music that requires all kinds of extra stuff (sampler, whoopee cushions, etc.) and has a theme that is so specific that it almost never makes sense on any concert program! But somehow it’s worked out. The piece has been played something like 25 times so far, and more groups have expressed some interest for future seasons. So I guess the lesson here is: be bold! (Or maybe: be crazy!) And as Evan Chambers used to tell me, “let your freak flag fly!”

But I should also mention my colleagues in the department at the time, who also contributed to this sort of crazy/boldness. People like Joel Puckett, Roshanne Etezady, DJ Sparr, Paul Fowler, Michael Djupstrom, Carter Pann, Kristin Kuster; the list goes on and on. I don’t think I would have ever written Screamer! if not for the generally open and playful attitude that these people brought to the department.

BTS: You write a lot of chamber music. What are some the differences/challenges you encounter when you compose for orchestra rather than a smaller ensemble?

DTL: I love writing for orchestra because the options are endless, and there are just so many people to work with. So much of my earliest music-making experiences were in large groups—either school bands or choruses, or rock bands with effects pedals, or in drum corps—so music to me has always been, on some level, about layers. You can really hear this in Screamer!, which almost always had a lot going on, sometimes in different meters or different keys. It’s a piece that’s really about the sonic impact of lots of stuff happening. I tend to really enjoy playing around with layers in that way.

Another thing that I love about orchestra is volume. Although a string quartet can also be loud, this is more about creating the illusion of loudness, whereas with an orchestra, it’s actually loud. Does that make sense? Just like there is nothing like standing in front of a Marshall stack at full volume to make you feel the music (and lose your hearing!), so too is there nothing like a big orchestral tutti to really make you feel it. This is not to say that there isn’t something to be said for quiet music—there absolutely is—but I do love a good orchestral tutti, especially on a really gnarly dissonant chord. (Screamer! has a few of those!)

On the other hand, there is an intimacy to chamber music that I really love, as well as a precision that one sometimes lacks with orchestra: it’s far easier to stop on a dime with 4 people than it is with 50! So for these things, and others, chamber music is great.

BTS: I hear you about there being something to be said for quiet music. Actually, your work descanso (after omega), which I’ve played several times, is extremely quiet and extremely beautiful. So, you’re also a performer. How does that affect the way you write music? Or doesn’t it?

DTL: This is something that I’ve been thinking about a lot, lately. I think it makes a huge difference, and think that every composer should perform other people’s music.

I should preface this by saying that I’ve had a really strange path to becoming a performer. Although my undergraduate degree was in percussion performance—so I did the standard recital thing, and subbed with regional groups like the York Symphony—I ultimately gave it up. I just had such a terrible experience with my teacher, who shall remain nameless, that I actually sold everything immediately after graduation. Quit. Cold turkey. I was just, like, done.

When I got to Michigan I discovered the Creative Arts Orchestra—an all improvised orchestra that did a lot of different things; Soundpainting, etc. I found myself really missing playing music, though not reading music. (I really only learned to read music in college, so this was always a source of stress for me.) I signed up for CAO, and that was my first step back into performing; it’s continued to grow from there. Now, I run my own ensemble in NYC, called Newspeak—for which I am also the drummer—and play from time to time with Corey Dargel and the International Contemporary Ensemble (ICE), so performing is becoming a more and more regular part of my life as a musician. I’m quite happy about it, though balancing that and composition can sometimes be difficult.

So, now to answer your questions: being a performer has changed a lot for me. Specifically playing with Newspeak, because we play so many new pieces, and often from younger composers—you know, people in their late 20s or so, often still in school—that I’ve really gotten to see things from the other side of the music stand, so to speak. Through this experience I’ve developed a lot of pet peeves!

For example: page turns. Composers will never know annoying it is to have bad page turns in a piece until they are forced, repeatedly, to deal with them. Similarly, cues in the parts, especially amidst long periods or rests or mixed meters. Though not always necessary, they are always helpful and always appreciated. Also, being smart about rhythmic notation. There are easy ways and hard ways to notate things: the hard ways win composer competitions, but the easier way is almost always better for the performer.

Newspeak just premiered a piece that felt almost impossible when we were rehearsing because there were no cues and some of the rhythmic notation was really counter-intuitive. While we ultimately performed the piece very well, the process could have been a lot less painful. It kind of drove me crazy.

We’re very much a groove-based band—I mean, I play drum set after all, an instrument that was made for playing beats! But so often we get pieces that have grooves that for no really clear reason aren’t notated to reflect the groove that we are hearing and playing. In other words, the strong beats that we hear will fall on a weak beat that we see. So it all just gets confusing. In one case we actually asked a composer to re-notate his piece to make it clearer. He did, and everyone’s ultimately been better off as a result.

BTS: You were recently named the first ever Dilettante Music Digital Composer-In-Residence. What’s that all about?

DTL: DilettanteMusic.com is a UK-based on-line classical music hub with which I became involved last November, when I was elected as their Digital Composer-in-Residence. They had this big open call for scores, so I entered. Everything was to happen digitally—via e-mail, etc.—and there was no fee, so I thought: why not? Next thing I knew I was having a piece recorded by the London Sinfonietta, and flying to London for the finals. There was a big on-line voting period to pick from the three finalists, and I ended up winning, thus becoming the first-ever Digital Composer-in-Residence.

Part of my duties there involves writing hopefully provocative posts about what’s going on in music. Most recently I’ve been writing about what it’s like to try to balance composing, my dissertation, performing, etc. But I’ve also posted about the Amen Break, opera, new performance spaces, etc. I even posted some punk Christmas carols around the holidays, from The Vandals’ Oi To The World album. So it’s been pretty free form. I do need to post more often, though. I have a pretty irregular schedule, so doing regularly scheduled things can be a little difficult for me.

One of the other really great things that I’ve been able to do as DCR is to initiate a video blog, where I interview composers or other creative people about what they’re up to. The first video was a collaborative roundtable with my old friends Missy Mazzoli, Stephen Taylor and Royce Vavrek—the parties involved in the opera premieres at Bard last month. Up next is an interview with creative producer Beth Morrison, and beyond that people like Corey Dargel, Ted Hearne, Leo Chadburn and more. It’s been really great so far and I look forward to contributing as much as I can during the second half of my, um, term in office.

BTS: My middle name is Theodore. Is it okay if I use the ‘T’ when I abbreviate my name so we can both have three initials or do you have a patent on that?

DTL: Of course! The “T” thing is funny with me. When I see “David Little” in print, I get kind of irritated. It must seem totally weird to people. I think part of it is that I’ve used the T for so long—since back in high school—that I really feel like that’s my name, you know? Even today, people who know me really well often call me “David t.” as my name.

Once I became a composer, though, it became a practical matter, since there are a few other David Little’s who compose. I actually—and I’m not even joking—got an e-mail this morning about another David Little’s piece. So in a way it’s just an attempt to keep things straight.

So, for the record: I’m David T. Little. “David Little” is some other guy. David T. Little wrote Screamer!, runs Newspeak, etc. I know it must seem totally ridiculous, but think of this this way: would you call John Luther Adams simply “John Adams”? No, right? So, yeah. It makes a difference.

Marin Alsop and the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra perform David T. Little’s Screamer! along with works by John Corigliano and Sergei Prokofiev tonight at the Music Hall at Strathmore and Friday through Sunday at Meyerhoff Symphony Hall in Baltimore. Click here for tickets and performance times.

Clarinetist Jennifer Everhart Talks About Preparing And Performing Boulez’s Dialogue du l’hombre double

Posted by Brian on Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

jennifer-everhart
Tonight at 8 p.m. at the Metro Gallery, the Contemporary Museum’s Mobtown Modern music series presents High Art, featuring compositions by Philip Glass, Brian Ferneyhough, Kaija Saariaho, Jason Eckardt, and Pierre Boulez and the amazing talents of flutists Katayoon Hodjati and Marcia Kämper (from the Baltimore Symphony) and clarinetist Jennifer Everhart. One of the works on the program, Pierre Boulez’s Dialogue du l’ombre double is so fiendishly difficult and requires such an incredible amount of work to stage, that it is rarely performed. I asked Mobtown Modern’s fearless clarinetist Jennifer Everhart to tell me a little more about the piece and the process of preparing such a daunting work for performance. Here’s what she had to say.

Brian Sacawa: Tell me a little bit about Boulez’s Dialogue du l’ombre double.

Jennifer Everhart: The title of the work translates to “Dialogue of the Double Shadow” and is inspired by a scene from “The Satin Slipper,” a play by French author Paul Claudel. In the scene, a double shadow of a man and woman embracing is projected on the stage and treated as a single character. The basic idea is that I am interacting with a shadow of myself. There are seven pre-recorded movements: An initial ‘sigle,’ followed by 5 transitions and then closing with the ‘sigle’ final. In between each of these is a live performance of six Strophes, with each movement dove-tailing to the next, very much like a conversation. By the way, the work was composed for the 1985 celebration of Luciano Berio’s 60th birthday.

BS: This piece is rarely performed. Why?

JE: Not only does the actual performance of the work require insane amounts of technical ability and flexibility but simply compiling all the components in the correct way takes tons of time and access to a fair amount of equipment. There is an entire booklet of detailed instructions that just apply to the recorded sections. The performance calls for 6 speakers that operate in surround sound and an additional speaker placed at a distance. Also, Boulez’s instructions call for a mic on a piano in the hall to capture the natural reverberations and then mix them with the live clarinet sound. All of this creates a unique aural experience.

BS: Is this the hardest thing you’ve ever played?

JE: Absolutely.

BS: One of the cool things about a performance of this work is that it uses a 6-speaker surround sound system. What’s actually played back through the speakers and how are the surround sound effects created?

JE: As I mentioned before, the speakers project the seven pre-recorded movements. Each movement had specific instructions on how to mic the clarinet and the exact amount of reverb to use. I used a combination of a close mic and a distant mic, each distance was given in meters by Boulez. The surround sound effect is created by sending different sections of a given movement to a different speaker. The score has several markings which indicate the speaker and volume level of a section of music. My brilliant and patient husband was able to sift through the score and make all the necessary edits.

BS: In meters?! It sounds like Boulez has some very exact instructions for how the piece is to be interpreted. How does that effect your performance?

JE: He is indeed incredibly specific on how to perform the work. However, this performance will be from my viewpoint, guided by the instructions Boulez gives, but providing my own interpretation. I see the instructions as a framework that I can use to build my own conversation (with myself), so to speak.

BS: How are the pre-recorded sounds triggered during a live performance?

JE: For this performance, the pre-recorded sounds are triggered by the audio engineer, aka my hubbie Matthew. He follows a score and simply starts the track at the given time and I also follow the score to make my solo entrances. Another component to the performance is that my sound is also amplified and for a few of the movements, the reverb is adjusted while I play, which Matthew also controls from the mixing board.

BS: So does your husband helping to make the pre-recorded part and triggering it in performance make him immune to punishment from, you know, like leaving piles of clothes around the house?

JE: I guess I could let him slide on a few things!

BS: What do you plan on having to drink after you perform this piece tonight?

JE: Dirty Martini. Heavy on the olives.

You can get to know Jennifer a little better via this video podcast:
YouTube Preview Image
And have a listen to Jennifer’s performance of Michael Lowenstern’s Ten Children from Mobtown Modern’s Low Art show this past October:
YouTube Preview Image

Clarinetist Jennifer Everhart and flutist Katayoon Hodjati perform works by Boulez, Glass, Ferneyhough, Saariaho, and Eckardt on the Contemporary Museum’s Mobtown Modern music series tonight at 8 p.m. at the Metro Gallery (1700 North Charles Street) in Baltimore’s Station North Arts District. Tickets are sold at the door and are $10 general admission and $5 for museum members and students with a valid ID. Visit www.mobtownmodern.com to preview music from this concert and to learn about more upcoming Mobtown Modern events.

Singing Pop Music Is Easier Than Singing Opera, Right?

Posted by Brian on Monday, March 15th, 2010

fleming-arcade-fire
Okay, sorry, I’m not done with this yet. So remember how Renée Fleming is covering Arcade Fire, Death Cab For Cutie, and other indie acts on her upcoming Dark Hope album? Well, isn’t it easier to sing pop music than to sing classical music? Like, you never hear about indie stars having to go to pop music conservatories to be taught how to sing indie rock in the correct style. But that’s the path you have to take to become a great opera star, right? I mean, unless you’re the ‘reality show opera star’ of the decade.

So then I heard this Terry Gross interview with the Carolina Chocolate Drops, where Rhiannon Giddens said something about being classically trained and the differences between singing ‘pop’ and classical. Each one has challenges and maybe even singing pop music has more challenges? What do yall think?

ccd_wide
If you’re an opera star is it easier to sing pop music bc u r ‘classically trained’?
Can you tell when a ‘classically trained’ singer sings pop music?
Could Ke$ha sing Philomel?

Baroque Music Not Allowed in the Pantheon After 6 p.m.

Posted by Brian on Monday, March 15th, 2010

pantheon-scandal
At least when one particular attendant is working. A concert by a Russian baroque sextet at the Pantheon in Rome was cut abruptly short because they were fixing to play past 6 p.m., when the monument was scheduled to close. Mozart is featured on the pages of Gothamist. Mark-Anthony Turnage prepares to unleash his “Anna Nicole” opera. Eighth Blackbird revises the guidelines for their much scrutinized composition competition. Elgar’s getting the boot from the £20 note. And Alex Ross schools the Royal Philharmonic Society on when to clap. Clap your hands and say yeah for your weekly starred items.

• A shocking YouTube video taken at the Pantheon in Rome captures an attendant stopping a concert of Vivaldi music to the jeers of the crowd. [fig. 1] Have you ever heard of people crying for more early music? Well, it happens in Italy. [Guardian]

• Mozart got a boost with the Gothamist set as a result of dispute between Gothamist founder Jake Dobkin and the New York Times. Let’s recap this in a nutshell: Dobkin said he was way better than the NYT and that the NYT stole some of his ideas. Then the NYT made Gothamist its bitch by plastering a huge ad on the site [fig. 2], which featured this Dan Wakin article about two piano works that were attributed to very young Mozart. [Gawker]

• Dutch soprano Eva-Maria Westbroek has signed on to sing the lead in Mark-Anthony Turnage’s upcoming “Anna Nicole” opera. Though the real question is: how long was the LA Times waiting to write that headline? [Los Angeles Times]

• After coming under some seriously crazy scrutiny (like, a 114 comment type of scrutiny; swoon…) for their self-funded commission composition competition, the Grammy-winning new music sextet Eighth Blackbird has decided to postpone the competition until June while they revise the submission guidelines. (And refund everyone’s application fees.) If ur a Grammee-winning newmusic 6tet do you need entry fees to subsidize your commissions? [Sequenza 21]

• Elgar’s 11-year run as a face on the £20 note will come to an end on June 30, 2010 with all of the Elgar pounds being rendered absolutely worthless from that date onward. Poor Elgar’s sacking will leave the Bank of England’s legal tender void of any musical representation. Some are calling for Sid Vicious to be the next musical face on the £20 note. Who would yall vote for? [Guardian]

• To clap or not to clap? That was the question—well, one of them—that Alex Ross posed during a lecture delivered to the Royal Philharmonic Society. The answer? Yes, go ahead and clap if you want; the composer may have even intended you to clap between movements. But just be careful not to clap between the movements in pieces where the composer didn’t intend you to. Tee-hee. [Guardian]

Figure 1.
YouTube Preview Image

Figure 2.
mozart-gothamist1