Archive for the ‘Graphs’ Category

Did the Internet Kill the DIY Star? #thanksalgore

Posted by Brian on Wednesday, April 21st, 2010


Last week this awesome infographic made the rounds in the blogosphere and it makes an appearance here today as I continue to operate in tour-delay mode. We all know that the internet has made it possible for composers/artists/musicians to reach more potential fans than ever—and largely by themselves since n e 1 can make a website and use an mp3 plugin—but it seems like this hasn’t translated into more compen$ation for artists. According to the infograph, the bigger the reach of the ‘content aggregator’ the le$$ money there is for you as an artist.

What’s better: a) having a big distributor ‘getting u out there,’ or b) making that paper?
Are there examples of a DIY artist successfully monetizing themselves?
Is there a model of how to be DIY and still make more money than you would if you were with a big internet mp3 distributor?
Have any performers ever had 1 of their bootleg live performances show up on a big mp3 distributor for sale? (N.B. I have.)
Should Al Gore be celebrated as the inventor of the internet or lynched because his invention is sucking profits away from the people who create art?

[Infographic via Information is Beautiful]

A Delicious Look at Alex Ross’s Doom Graph Post

Posted by Brian on Thursday, February 11th, 2010

seinfeld

Last week, New Yorker music critic Alex Ross wrote a post that included a death of classical music apocalypse graph via the League of American Orchestras’ Audience Demographic Research Review (see below). What this graph basically shows is that in each generation, there is a spike in classical music concert attendance at some point during that generation’s lifetime. Well, in all generations except one generation: Generation X. Obviously, this is big-time bad—and downright scary—news for classical music organizations. But the whole how-we-can-increase-participation subject is for another post, not this one.

Anyway, as I tend to do when I find things on the web I consider to be interesting or important or that I simply want to remember, I save them to my Delicious account. If you’ve not heard of Delicious (nee del.icio.us) before, it’s an online social bookmarking site. You bookmark a link, tag it, share it, comment on it, etc. But you can also see who else has bookmarked that particular link and if they’ve had anything to say about it. As I bookmarked Alex’s article, I noticed that several other people had as well. And they added some interesting comments.

classical-attendance

Here’s the first one that caught my attention, from user Satisfy the Mind:

bookmark1

The complete quote:

“I just wish people would listen to a wider variety of all kinds of music. Unfortunately most people have little frame of reference to understand or appreciate so-called classical music. We also have to get beyond this idea of associating certain kinds of music with certain demographics or political persuasions.”

Exactly, Satisfy the Mind. That’s what I was saying here just a couple days ago. No need for me to elaborate further.

Here’s the portion of Alex’s post I chose to highlight:

brian-bookmark

Though there’s more that I quoted, let’s just focus on the first sentence there: “It’s time to drop the mask of professional aloofness.” This has been something of a personal crusade for years. Aloofness, but also, and maybe more so, distance. There’s this “thing” that’s around in classical music where the process has to be secretive and mystical in some way, like we’re practicing some kind of esoteric sorcery. The composer locks him/herself away for months at a time. The musician isolates him/herself within the confines of a soundproof room. And in both cases, they emerge bearing these magical gifts that just happened to appear.

I’m not trying to take anything away from the “magic” of music because that’s definitely what makes it so attractive, seductive, sexy, and powerful to so many people. What I’m getting at is that the process of creating or arriving at those magical and transcendental experiences is by and large not that magical—it’s just hard work. Why perpetuate this myth that we’re navigating this higher transcendental plane? To a lot of people, I think it just comes off as snobbish.

Listen, I’m a big fan of transparency. I think giving people a window into the creative process is one of the most beneficial things we can do for the future of the art. People don’t get interested in something unless they’ve got some kind of investment in it. And providing a glimpse into how we practice our esoteric musicraft is just one possibility for inviting more participation. Why wouldn’t you want to do that?

bookmark2

Poop to Not Poop Ratios

Posted by Brian on Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

newmusicpoop
popmusicpoop
popratio

If the pie charts tell us one thing for certain, it’s that new music is a niche market. I mean, since the ratio of Poop to Not Poop in both New Music and Pop Music is equal (+/- 1%, of course), then it stands to reason that the skewed popularity ratio between New Music and Pop Music is not the result of Pop Music possessing greater quantities of Not Poop, but rather that Pop Music is, well, more popular. Question: Is there anything wrong with being a niche market? Think about it, but also think about the following quote from this mostly Not Poop post via the Proper Discord blog:

“All too often, we confuse ‘niche’ with ‘endangered’ when in truth the top end of any market is usually quite unpopular. Mercedes Benz has a 3% share of the US car market. They aren’t worried about extinction. Why should we be scared?”

brian-mercedes

Before going any further, let’s highlight some of the similarities between Mercedes Benz and Classical/New Music. A Mercedes Benz is a solid, well-crafted, finely-tuned machine. Classical musicians are highly-trained and capable of great precision. A Mercedes Benz is expensive. So too are tickets to many classical music concerts. People who can afford a Mercedes Benz are generally part of an elite social caste. People who like classical music are stereotyped as being elite. So with all the similarity, why doesn’t Classical/New Music share the same sort of niche market perks as Mercedes Benz? Here’s one possible reason:

mercedes-snob

I don’t think being a niche market is all that bad. (N.B. This is coming from a lifelong Red Sox fan. Translation: I have been raised to root for the underdog.) I also don’t believe that being a niche market means being headed for extinction. Ain’t gonna happen. Too many people pay too much money to go to college and learn the craft of classical music to let that knowledge just sit around and rot in their heads. We’ve just got to do a better job getting that information out there in a manner that says, “Hey, this is neat. You should listen to it,” and not, “Hey, I’m way smarter than you.” Are there ways we can change from perceptions of elitism so that we might move away from snob characterization to hot chick characterization?

It’s also not impossible that a niche market gains a following, becomes more popular, and then more mainstream. Remember MTV in the 1990s? That whole alternative music, Seattle grunge scene thing? But if mainstream acceptance like that happens you’ve got to be prepared for name calling (“SELLOUT!”) and the possible loss of the music’s true soul and quality. Surely there are ways to have your cake and eat it too. Right?