Archive for the ‘New Music’ Category

Can I Get A . . . ?

Posted by Brian on Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

indie-graffiti
Okay, first read this quote from a post about the ‘burgeoning’ indie classical movement by Christian Carey over at Sequenza21:

In some critical circles, indie classical has, rightly or wrongly, been under the microscope for making pop into a ‘longhair’ genre, robbing it of its immediacy in favor of overt sophistication. I’d submit that this vantage point doesn’t give enough credit to indie audiences, who seem to be just fine grappling with orchestral arrangements by Pallett and electronic experiments by Animal Collective alike.

Now listen to Lil Jon’s (well, Dave Chappelle doing Lil Jon) response to this statement:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Does this seem a little backward to anyone? I’ve definitely heard people bitching about this supposed stylistic marriage’s detrimental effects on new music. But what critical circles are complaining about indie rock becoming too sophisticated and cerebral AS A RESULT of the ‘burgeoning’ indie classical movement? (Play that Lil Jon mp3 again.) I think that goes a little far in terms of what kind of ‘influence’ this ‘burgeoning’ movement is having, especially on the genre it is stealing from. Do indie rock kids even talk about this?

My Ignite Baltimore Talk, Transcribed

Posted by Brian on Friday, March 5th, 2010

ignite-logo
The following is the transcript of my Ignite Baltimore talk, which was titled “Hybridity: Remaking Baltimore’s (New) Musical Horizon.” The event took place at the Walters Art Museum on Thursday, March 4, 2010 at 7 p.m.

Okay, so I’m a Peabody grad. And as a Peabody grad you get the Peabody magazine, which, you know, makes you feel pretty good about yourself because you’re connected at least by affiliation to all these amazing things that other Peabody people are doing all over the world. Anyway, as I was flipping through the latest issue one page in particular caught my attention and that was a page listing upcoming performances by some Peabody students, alums, and faculty in New York City and Washington, DC. And at the bottom of the page there were URLs for a listing of those events on the Peabody website. So, I went to the website and checked out the information, saw who was doing what and where they were doing it. Then, just as an experiment, I decided to replace ‘nyc’ and ‘washington’ in the web address with ‘baltimore,’ which then yielded, um, nothing.

peabody-wtf

So, I think this is a problem. It’s a problem because it sends a message that Baltimore isn’t a place where you can achieve success as a musician. Or, like, even if you’re doing something musically interesting or innovative in Baltimore, that it doesn’t count; that what’s happening in Baltimore doesn’t carry the same weight or credibility as something that’s happening in New York City or Washington, DC. Anyway, without getting too down on Peabody, because I think it really is a world-class conservatory, I’d at least like to think that an institution that lives in Baltimore would want to highlight the fact that this city has a pretty rich and vibrant musical culture. But, of course, that’s coming from someone who believes that Baltimore can be, should be, and actually is an important place for musical innovation.

About two years ago there was an article in the Guardian about the booming music scene in Brooklyn, NY, which talked about the role Baltimore had played in the borough’s so-called musical renaissance. Yeah, it was great for Baltimore to be recognized for its “curveball creativity,” but I was honestly more than a little offended by the notion that Baltimore was merely serving as Brooklyn’s farm team and couldn’t be a place where a hip and innovative musical culture could throw down roots and thrive. But that article was published almost two years ago and paradigms have shifted a little. Now more and more musicians who call Baltimore home are defying the stereotype that you need to live in a closet in a dingy Brooklyn apartment for a chance at notoriety outside of Charm City.

categories

But in my musical ghetto, I mean, niche, which has been dubbed several things, for better or for worse, including, new music, post-classical, alt-classical, indie-classical, non-pop, up-pop, contemporary classical, modern classical, avant classical, totalist, newmusic with no space between words, and new-music with a hyphen, to name just a few, New York City’s reputation as the center of the universe still prevails among both musicians and the media. I mean, there’s a reason why, I suppose. There’s been a lot of innovation in New York recently, especially when you’re talking about the current trend in new music, which is basically built on the formation of a hybrid musical culture. But what I’m saying is that New York City isn’t the only place this can happen and I actually think Baltimore, with its strong do-it-yourself ethos and overwhelming sense of community within and across artistic disciplines, is perhaps even better suited to create this yet to be defined hybrid.

So can you tell that I’m a fan of Baltimore? Seriously. Like, that Live Baltimore organization should have me on its payroll because rarely do I miss a chance to extoll the city’s virtues to people who know next to nothing about the what’s going on here, which is something I’d like to explore for a brief moment. And that is, what do people think about when they think about Baltimore? Well, here are a few things: crabs, boarded up houses, shit-eating drag queens, and The Wire. Oh, indeed. And musically speaking, it’s been the crazies who have defined the city to a larger audience. Now please don’t get me wrong, I love the fact that there’s a scene, or multiple scenes, in Baltimore that are dedicated to the experimental, to the really out-there shit, to the irreverent, and to the quirky. That is great. It means that there’s a strong musical voice rooted in Baltimore. But I think we can turn the page on that being all there is.

iheartbmore

Because the flip side of selling ourselves as quirky involves the outside perception of what Baltimore values musically and what it’s all about. I mean, if I’m an outsider looking in and if the majority of what I’m seeing is quirky and irreverent, I’m getting a pretty strong message that goes something like, “Hey! Don’t take us too seriously!” You know? Because in general, the whacked out shit in Baltimore is what people remember and has ended up defining us to everyone else. Yeah, I get it, Baltimore’s quirky and that’s how it’s been selling itself. I’m down with that. But what I’m saying is that that’s not all that we have to offer here and there are things that can be done, should be done, and need to be done to start changing perspectives. But everyone’s got to get on board. Especially the people who call Baltimore home and who have the ability to effect this kind of change to help bring the kind of credibility to the city that it deserves but even though they’re living here and are some of Baltimore’s biggest media darlings, continue to work primarily outside Baltimore and don’t seem to be all that interested in contributing to this city’s musical life. Anyway, that’s what I’m about. That’s what I’m trying to do. Thank you.

Is New Music Saving Opera Or Scandalizing It?

Posted by Brian on Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

nico-mothertongue
Classical music is dying. (Or may already be dead; just depends on who you talk to.) And so is opera. At least that’s what some people would have you believe. Brendan Cooke, the General Director of the Baltimore Concert Opera, an organization that rose from the ashes of the Baltimore Opera Company, believes it’s dying and will be giving a presentation on that subject at the next Ignite Baltitmore. There was, however, an interesting comment on Brendan’s Ignite proposal from a user named “Figaro”:

Just because the Baltimore Opera went under doesn’t mean the artform is dying. Surely you saw all the press—both good and bad—about Luc Bondy’s staging of Tosca at the Met? To me, this demonstrates how much life there is in opera at the present time. Good work starting the BCO but I think the premise of your proposal—that opera is dying—is completely false. No other form of fine arts has generated the amount of discussion and buzz as opera right now; and people aren’t talking about it because they think it’s dying.

I would tend to agree with that statement. Wait a second. Who am I kidding? I wouldn’t tend to agree with that statement, I do agree with that statement. I also agree with the tenet that any press is good press. Q: What’s the best way to get a child to do something? A: Tell them they can’t. So the same-old, same-old productions aren’t going to generate a buzz like a cracked-out new production that takes some risks and exercises perhaps more than its fair share of artistic license. I don’t claim to know the ins and outs of what’s up in the opera world, but it seems to me that far from sounding opera’s death knell, risky productions are doing far more for the art form’s visibility than would be possible with a business-as-usual model. The only harm being done seems to be in the minds of purists, who want to preserve tradition even if that leads to opera’s demise. I mean, it’s not pissing the composers off. They’re dead, after all.

Enter the news last week that new-indie-alt-post-un-pop classical darling Nico Muhly, along with playwright Craig Lucas, was awarded the first joint Metropolitan Opera and Lincoln Center Theater commission. As news of this landmark commission rippled throughout the blogosphere—sorry, I’m making this dramatic cuz it’s about opera—it touched off a veritable shitstorm in the comments section of a post at operablogsite Parterre Box. Here’s a particularly intelligent, thoughtful, and articulate one:

fucknicomuhly1
Terrible, indeed. The comment, that is. Who writes shit like that?! Oh wait, anonymous people! But anyway, unlike Luc Bondy’s Tosca, some people bitchy anonymous commenters think this thing is scandalous already! (Again with the kid metaphor. Parent: “You’re not going to listen to that devil worship music! I won’t allow it!” And guess what’s on that kid’s iPod?) As you might expect, other commenters ganged up on schweigundtanze, which prompted him/her to clarify his/her position:

muhly-comment1
Uhhhhhh . . .

muhly-mayer1
For the record, I happen to be a big fan of Nico’s music. He’s one of a handful of young composers who’s actually doing what everyone has been talking about. Maybe I’ll even go out on an limb and call him the effing new music Jesus. I mean, you see the way he’s being crucified by some people, right? Maybe nowadays, when media is king, it’s good to have scandals around the operas themselves and not just in them?

nico-jesus1

[mouth image from the cover of Nico Muhly's Mothertongue album]

Pull Quote: Anthony Tommasini —

Posted by Brian on Sunday, February 14th, 2010

pullquote-tommasini1
on the trend of new music players and composers mixing ideologically opposing streams of contemporary music on the same program.

[via New York Times]