Posts Tagged ‘alt-classical’

Pull Quote: Dennis DeSantis —

Posted by Brian on Friday, April 30th, 2010

pullquote-desantis
adding his two cents to the great ‘alt-classical’ ‘debate’ of 2k10. Here’s the rest of the above sentiment:

Alternative used to mean Rage Against the Machine. Later, it meant Limp Bizkit. Is that an admirable trajectory? Today, alt-classical means Alarm Will Sound. Tomorrow, will it mean Bond? It’s very easy (and often very profitable) to take something that gained credibility for being other and monetize it by taking things that are not other and dressing them up as other.

Matt Marks and Dennis DeSantis Punctuate the ‘Alt-Classical’ ‘Debate’

Posted by Brian on Thursday, April 29th, 2010

alt-classical-roadsign
My post from earlier this week that wondered whether a new generation of composition teachers would be more open to the use of popular music /styles / techniques / sounds in the music of their students than the ‘old guard’ created a ripple of chatter and ‘stirred the pot’ a little. Here’s a little recap of the action for Twitter resisters. First to chime in was Gabriel Kahane. Kahane (I’ll use Kahane since he used Sacawa) used his Tumblr to state his position. I made a funny picture. Then Matt Marks, whose comment on a separate post inspired the ‘pot stirring’ post, made a pretty definitive statement on the ‘issue’ / ‘debate’. Then Dennis had had enough.

dennis-makeshittweet
Should we make more Charles Wuorinen cat picture memes?

‘Alt-Classical’. So Hot Right Now.

Posted by Brian on Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

altclassical-so-hot
dennis-tweet
seinfeld-altclassical
Why is every1 talking about ‘alt-classical’?
Is it Anne Midgette‘s fault?
Is it Greg Sandow’s fault?
Is it 8bb‘s fault?
Is it bad to talk about ‘alt-classical’?

Is the Current ‘Alt-Classical’ ‘Movement’ Just a Fad?

Posted by Brian on Friday, April 23rd, 2010

wuorinen-uncompromising
Allan Kozinn wrote the following as the first sentence of a recent review:

Trendy ensembles that play accessible, eclectic new music get most of the attention (and listeners) these days, but you have to admire groups like the New York New Music Ensemble for continuing to champion the more rigorous end of the contemporary repertory.

One assumes by “trendy ensembles” he’s talking about any number of ‘bandsembles’ in the indie / alt-classisphere. I’m pretty sure the word “trend” has been used to describe the current new music ‘movement,’ but I think it’s usually been utilized in the ‘this-is-the-way-music-is-moving-in-the-future’ kind of sense and not in the ‘fad’ kind of sense. That’s interesting. Is this whole thing we talk about so much these days just a fad? Will anything relevant, meaningful, and lasting emerge from this ‘trend’ or will the next generation of composers come up with something new to overthrow the ‘relevancy’ many are working overtime to achieve? Will music by composers who are deemed ‘uncompromising’ be the transcendent new music?

R u an ensemble that ‘champions’ music by ‘uncompromising’ and ‘thorny’ composers?
Is it trendy 2 play ‘accessible’ music?
Are new music ‘bandsembles’ that play ‘uncompromising’ music more authentic?
Since trends come and go, when will this ‘accessible’ trend end?
Should ‘alt-classical’ b referred 2 as fad-classical?
Will it ever b trendy 2 play ‘rigorous’ ‘uncompromising’ music?
Who is creating relevant ‘alt-classical’ music?
Can you be ‘uncompromising’ and still play at ‘LPR’?
Would ‘uncompromising’ composers prefer their music be played in ‘uncompromising’ venues instead of ‘mixed use’ ‘spaces’ that serve beer and wine and ‘tapas’?
What is an ‘uncompromising’ venue?
A dungeon?
An operating room?
A dominatrix basement?
Merkin Concert Hall?
Could Charles Wuorinen write an ‘alt-classical’ piece?
If u ‘remixed’ some Wuorinen would he ‘sue ur ass’?